OT - new look at old intelligence - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums

11-12-2006, 09:07 PM

Democrats started looking at old intelligence that Rumsfeld ignored. Turns
out Bin Laden offered to surrender 2 years ago, and Iraqi oil was found to
be so sour that most of it is not economically feasible to refine. Too bad
no one read this material earlier.

11-12-2006, 09:46 PM

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 03:07:33 GMT, "Art"
<begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Democrats started looking at old intelligence that Rumsfeld ignored. Turns
>out Bin Laden offered to surrender 2 years ago, and Iraqi oil was found to
>be so sour that most of it is not economically feasible to refine. Too bad
>no one read this material earlier.
>[/color]

ROFL

You surrender monkeys are getting going early.

--

Scott in Florida

11-13-2006, 10:40 AM

JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 10:47:56 AM,
<Ms06h.5428$ya1.3606@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> This should assist with your understanding of your worlds.
> [url]www.zombo.com[/url][/color]

It looks like you have been spending some time at ZomboCom.

11-13-2006, 11:30 AM

On 13 Nov 2006 16:40:00 GMT, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 10:47:56 AM,
><Ms06h.5428$ya1.3606@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> This should assist with your understanding of your worlds.
>> [url]www.zombo.com[/url][/color]
>
>It looks like you have been spending some time at ZomboCom.[/color]

LOL....the more libs talk the more you find out how kooky they are....

--

Scott in Florida

11-13-2006, 11:32 AM

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:ctahl2pp9j6unuki1bte37d1a11g0uh843@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On 13 Nov 2006 16:40:00 GMT, "badgolferman"
> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 10:47:56 AM,
>><Ms06h.5428$ya1.3606@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> This should assist with your understanding of your worlds.
>>> [url]www.zombo.com[/url][/color]
>>
>>It looks like you have been spending some time at ZomboCom.[/color]
>
> LOL....the more libs talk the more you find out how kooky they are....
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?

11-13-2006, 12:35 PM

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny...[color=blue]
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:ctahl2pp9j6unuki1bte37d1a11g0uh843@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On 13 Nov 2006 16:40:00 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 10:47:56 AM,
>>><Ms06h.5428$ya1.3606@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This should assist with your understanding of your worlds.
>>>> [url]www.zombo.com[/url]
>>>
>>>It looks like you have been spending some time at ZomboCom.[/color]
>>
>> LOL....the more libs talk the more you find out how kooky they are....
>> Scott in Florida
>>[/color]
>
>
> Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
>[/color]
You just nailed it, needy indeed.

11-13-2006, 12:58 PM

JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
<__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?[/color]

Top Posters for 10/2006

Ranking Articles Name
------- -------- ----------------------------
1 407 Scott in Florida
2 331 Stuart Krivis
3 328 JoeSpareBedroom

You require quite a bit of attention yourself too!

--
"When you're full of bull, keep your mouth shut." ~ Will Rogers

11-13-2006, 01:00 PM

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
> <__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?[/color]
>
> Top Posters for 10/2006
>
> Ranking Articles Name
> ------- -------- ----------------------------
> 1 407 Scott in Florida
> 2 331 Stuart Krivis
> 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
>
>
> You require quite a bit of attention yourself too![/color]

Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of yours (and
dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling. Totally devoid of any
sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.

The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which would require
more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't work.

11-13-2006, 03:40 PM

JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
> ><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?[/color]
> >
> > Top Posters for 10/2006
> >
> > Ranking Articles Name
> > ------- -------- ----------------------------
> > 1 407 Scott in Florida
> > 2 331 Stuart Krivis
> > 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
> >
> >
> > You require quite a bit of attention yourself too![/color]
>
> Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
> yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
> Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
>
> The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which would
> require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't work.[/color]

I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
usual.

11-13-2006, 03:41 PM

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:40:12 -0500, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
>> ><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
>> >
>> > Top Posters for 10/2006
>> >
>> > Ranking Articles Name
>> > ------- -------- ----------------------------
>> > 1 407 Scott in Florida
>> > 2 331 Stuart Krivis
>> > 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
>> >
>> >
>> > You require quite a bit of attention yourself too![/color]
>>
>> Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
>> yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
>> Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
>>
>> The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which would
>> require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't work.[/color]
>
>I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
>usual.[/color]

He could never pass a sobriety test on the side of the road.

No straight lines can be walked by him...LOL

--

Scott in Florida

11-13-2006, 03:42 PM

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0etobgm6xk0p6001@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
>> ><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
>> >
>> > Top Posters for 10/2006
>> >
>> > Ranking Articles Name
>> > ------- -------- ----------------------------
>> > 1 407 Scott in Florida
>> > 2 331 Stuart Krivis
>> > 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
>> >
>> >
>> > You require quite a bit of attention yourself too![/color]
>>
>> Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
>> yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
>> Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
>>
>> The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which would
>> require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't work.[/color]
>
> I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
> usual.[/color]

I deflect? What facts are you referring to? Your numbers? They only
represent OT messages, right? They don't indicate the content of those
messages.

11-13-2006, 03:47 PM

JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,4:42:27 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0etobgm6xk0p6001@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...
> >>> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
> >>><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
> > > >
> >>> > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
> > > >
> >>> Top Posters for 10/2006
> > > >
> >>> Ranking Articles Name
> >>> ------- -------- ----------------------------
> >>> 1 407 Scott in Florida
> >>> 2 331 Stuart Krivis
> >>> 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
> > > >
> > > >
> >>> You require quite a bit of attention yourself too!
> > >
> > > Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
> > > yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
> > > Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
> > >
> > > The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which
> > > would require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't
> > > work.[/color]
> >
> > I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
> > usual.[/color]
>
> I deflect? What facts are you referring to? Your numbers? They only
> represent OT messages, right? They don't indicate the content of
> those messages.[/color]

They reflect the attention you crave.

11-13-2006, 03:50 PM

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0etobmw6xt43v004@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,4:42:27 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0etobgm6xk0p6001@news.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >>"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...
>> >>> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
>> >>><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
>> > > >
>> >>> > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
>> > > >
>> >>> Top Posters for 10/2006
>> > > >
>> >>> Ranking Articles Name
>> >>> ------- -------- ----------------------------
>> >>> 1 407 Scott in Florida
>> >>> 2 331 Stuart Krivis
>> >>> 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >>> You require quite a bit of attention yourself too!
>> > >
>> > > Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
>> > > yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
>> > > Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
>> > >
>> > > The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which
>> > > would require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't
>> > > work.
>> >
>> > I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
>> > usual.[/color]
>>
>> I deflect? What facts are you referring to? Your numbers? They only
>> represent OT messages, right? They don't indicate the content of
>> those messages.[/color]
>
> They reflect the attention you crave.[/color]

At least my posts are devoid of name calling. At least half of yours are
nothing but. Some days, they're all that way, especially when you get into
one of your love fests with dbu.

11-13-2006, 03:56 PM

JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,4:50:35 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0etobmw6xt43v004@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,4:42:27 PM, wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:xn0etobgm6xk0p6001@news.readfreenews.net...
> >>> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006,2:00:12 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> >>>>"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>> > news:xn0eto762edny5003@news.readfreenews.net...
> >>>>> JoeSpareBedroom, 11/13/2006, 12:32:42 PM,
> >>>>><__16h.5309$Ka1.5233@news01.roc.ny> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>>>> > Why are you so starved for attention? It's rather childish?
> >>> > >
> >>>>> Top Posters for 10/2006
> >>> > >
> >>>>> Ranking Articles Name
> >>>>> ------- -------- ----------------------------
> >>>>> 1 407 Scott in Florida
> >>>>> 2 331 Stuart Krivis
> >>>>> 3 328 JoeSpareBedroom
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>>>> You require quite a bit of attention yourself too!
> >>> >
> >>> > Now, go read every one of those articles, and notice how many of
> >>> > yours (and dbu's) consist of nothing but childish name-calling.
> >>> > Totally devoid of any sort of substance. I'll guess 90%.
> >>> >
> >>> > The gibberish is an attempt to avoid answering questions which
> >>> > would require more than 30 seconds to think about. It doesn't
> >>> > work.
> > > >
> >>> I see you are cornered with facts and must resort to deflection as
> >>> usual.
> > >
> > > I deflect? What facts are you referring to? Your numbers? They
> > > only represent OT messages, right? They don't indicate the
> > > content of those messages.[/color]
> >
> > They reflect the attention you crave.[/color]
>
> At least my posts are devoid of name calling. At least half of yours
> are nothing but. Some days, they're all that way, especially when you
> get into one of your love fests with dbu.[/color]

You obviously have me mistaken for someone else. That's okay, you are
mistaken about so many other things I wouldn't expect anything else.

The point of all this is that what you claim Scott guilty of you are
just as bad. Your posts are just more wordy than Scott's but the
content is basically the same.

11-13-2006, 06:01 PM

In article <VjR5h.6356$ig4.5939@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>,
"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Democrats started looking at old intelligence that Rumsfeld ignored. Turns
> out Bin Laden offered to surrender 2 years ago, and Iraqi oil was found to
> be so sour that most of it is not economically feasible to refine. Too bad
> no one read this material earlier.[/color]

Cite, please?