{OT} respect

Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly elected a
chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have begun to
feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom Lehrer)

Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT posts
have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail on
their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real world of
politics.

That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.

In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
"tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly elected a
> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have begun to
> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom Lehrer)
>
> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT posts
> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail on
> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real world of
> politics.
>
> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.[/color]

No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how the
democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans for
holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.

Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean anything
at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't going
to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on who
will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans out
there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you? Either
side?
--

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
> "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly elected
>> a
>> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have begun
>> to
>> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom Lehrer)
>>
>> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT
>> posts
>> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail on
>> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real world
>> of
>> politics.
>>
>> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.[/color]
>
> No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how the
> democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans for
> holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
> filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
>
> Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean anything
> at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't going
> to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on who
> will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans out
> there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you? Either
> side?
> --
>[/color]
You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all provide
most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a job,
Bushie" NOT!

For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet the
press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American Public,
according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a parking
lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.

And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can talk
about candidates without name calling, eh)

In article <3q46h.5322$Ka1.1970@news01.roc.ny>,
"tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly elected
> >> a
> >> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have begun
> >> to
> >> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom Lehrer)
> >>
> >> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT
> >> posts
> >> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail on
> >> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real world
> >> of
> >> politics.
> >>
> >> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.[/color]
> >
> > No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how the
> > democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans for
> > holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
> > filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
> >
> > Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean anything
> > at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't going
> > to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on who
> > will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans out
> > there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you? Either
> > side?
> > --
> >[/color]
> You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all provide
> most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
> scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a job,
> Bushie" NOT!
>
> For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet the
> press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American Public,
> according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
> course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a parking
> lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.
>
> And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can talk
> about candidates without name calling, eh)[/color]

Me mud slinging, look at yourself and your buddies. Everytime you post
something it's a hateful comment against the president or someone in his
administration. YOU are the mud slinger.
--

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-D2BBE8.15474013112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <3q46h.5322$Ka1.1970@news01.roc.ny>,
> "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>> > In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
>> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly
>> >> elected
>> >> a
>> >> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have
>> >> begun
>> >> to
>> >> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom
>> >> Lehrer)
>> >>
>> >> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT
>> >> posts
>> >> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail
>> >> on
>> >> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real
>> >> world
>> >> of
>> >> politics.
>> >>
>> >> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.
>> >
>> > No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how the
>> > democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans for
>> > holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
>> > filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
>> >
>> > Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean
>> > anything
>> > at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't going
>> > to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on who
>> > will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans out
>> > there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you? Either
>> > side?
>> > --
>> >[/color]
>> You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all
>> provide
>> most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
>> scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a job,
>> Bushie" NOT!
>>
>> For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet the
>> press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American
>> Public,
>> according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
>> course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a
>> parking
>> lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.
>>
>> And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can talk
>> about candidates without name calling, eh)[/color]
>
> Me mud slinging, look at yourself and your buddies. Everytime you post
> something it's a hateful comment against the president or someone in his
> administration. YOU are the mud slinger.
> --
>[/color]
My goodness, a bit defensive, aren't we.

In article <Ck76h.5338$Ka1.4361@news01.roc.ny>,
"tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-D2BBE8.15474013112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <3q46h.5322$Ka1.1970@news01.roc.ny>,
> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> >> news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
> >> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly
> >> >> elected
> >> >> a
> >> >> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have
> >> >> begun
> >> >> to
> >> >> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom
> >> >> Lehrer)
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's OT
> >> >> posts
> >> >> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or fail
> >> >> on
> >> >> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real
> >> >> world
> >> >> of
> >> >> politics.
> >> >>
> >> >> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.
> >> >
> >> > No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how the
> >> > democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans for
> >> > holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
> >> > filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
> >> >
> >> > Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean
> >> > anything
> >> > at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't going
> >> > to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on who
> >> > will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans out
> >> > there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you? Either
> >> > side?
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all
> >> provide
> >> most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
> >> scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a job,
> >> Bushie" NOT!
> >>
> >> For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet the
> >> press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American
> >> Public,
> >> according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
> >> course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a
> >> parking
> >> lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.
> >>
> >> And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can talk
> >> about candidates without name calling, eh)[/color]
> >
> > Me mud slinging, look at yourself and your buddies. Everytime you post
> > something it's a hateful comment against the president or someone in his
> > administration. YOU are the mud slinger.
> > --
> >[/color]
> My goodness, a bit defensive, aren't we.[/color]

Not really, just replicating a response by you, thin skinned are you?
--

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-3136F1.17501413112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <Ck76h.5338$Ka1.4361@news01.roc.ny>,
> "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> news:repubs-D2BBE8.15474013112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>> > In article <3q46h.5322$Ka1.1970@news01.roc.ny>,
>> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> >> > In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
>> >> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly
>> >> >> elected
>> >> >> a
>> >> >> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have
>> >> >> begun
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom
>> >> >> Lehrer)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's
>> >> >> OT
>> >> >> posts
>> >> >> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or
>> >> >> fail
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real
>> >> >> world
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> politics.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.
>> >> >
>> >> > No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how
>> >> > the
>> >> > democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans
>> >> > for
>> >> > holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
>> >> > filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
>> >> >
>> >> > Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean
>> >> > anything
>> >> > at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't
>> >> > going
>> >> > to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on
>> >> > who
>> >> > will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans
>> >> > out
>> >> > there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you?
>> >> > Either
>> >> > side?
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all
>> >> provide
>> >> most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
>> >> scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a
>> >> job,
>> >> Bushie" NOT!
>> >>
>> >> For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet
>> >> the
>> >> press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American
>> >> Public,
>> >> according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
>> >> course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a
>> >> parking
>> >> lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.
>> >>
>> >> And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can
>> >> talk
>> >> about candidates without name calling, eh)
>> >
>> > Me mud slinging, look at yourself and your buddies. Everytime you post
>> > something it's a hateful comment against the president or someone in
>> > his
>> > administration. YOU are the mud slinger.
>> > --
>> >[/color]
>> My goodness, a bit defensive, aren't we.[/color]
>
> Not really, just replicating a response by you, thin skinned are you?
> --
>[/color]
I see, running out of things to rant about? Here, let me help you out:

"Some of the very activists who helped propel the Democrats to a majority in
the House and Senate last week are claiming credit for the victories and
demanding what they consider their due: a set of ambitious - and politically
provocative - actions on gun control, abortion, national security and other
issues that party leaders fear could alienate moderate voters and leave
Democrats vulnerable to GOP attacks as big spenders or soft on terrorism."
Full article:
[url]http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-dems12nov12,0,4533842.story?track=mostviewed-homepage[/url]

Knock yourself out running on about this or that

In article <tI76h.5340$Ka1.3163@news01.roc.ny>,
"tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-3136F1.17501413112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <Ck76h.5338$Ka1.4361@news01.roc.ny>,
> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> >> news:repubs-D2BBE8.15474013112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <3q46h.5322$Ka1.1970@news01.roc.ny>,
> >> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:repubs-5E31DD.09075913112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> >> > In article <wW_5h.5300$Ka1.3370@news01.roc.ny>,
> >> >> > "tak" <takirch@frontiernet.net> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Seems like only a week ago, everybody was going to give the newly
> >> >> >> elected
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> chance to take office before whining, but it appears " people have
> >> >> >> begun
> >> >> >> to
> >> >> >> feel like a Christian scientist with appendicitis" (thanks to Tom
> >> >> >> Lehrer)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Well, whine on, the electorate has spoken and the effect this NG's
> >> >> >> OT
> >> >> >> posts
> >> >> >> have on the general population says the Democrats will survive or
> >> >> >> fail
> >> >> >> on
> >> >> >> their own merits. Nothing here seems likely to influence the real
> >> >> >> world
> >> >> >> of
> >> >> >> politics.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> That said, The Prez is down to 31% as per MSNBC this A.M.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > No whining I can't speak for anyone else. I'm watching to see how
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > democrats perform and how much blame they will put on Republicans
> >> >> > for
> >> >> > holding up their agenda. Perhaps the Republicans will threaten to
> >> >> > filibuster and the Democrats will threaten the nuclear option.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Don't worry about Bush and his numbers. They really don't mean
> >> >> > anything
> >> >> > at this time. He's not running again and the poll numbers aren't
> >> >> > going
> >> >> > to cause him to leave office like Nixon. I'd be concentrating on
> >> >> > who
> >> >> > will be running for prez in 08. For me I don't see any Republicans
> >> >> > out
> >> >> > there that really stands out at least not yet. How about you?
> >> >> > Either
> >> >> > side?
> >> >> > --
> >> >> >
> >> >> You not whining? Check your posts, and your fellow RW Whiners. Y'all
> >> >> provide
> >> >> most of the mud winging around on the group. Poll Numbers are just a
> >> >> scorecard of the number of people thinking "You're doing a heck of a
> >> >> job,
> >> >> Bushie" NOT!
> >> >>
> >> >> For 2008, take John McCain off my short list. Listened to him on meet
> >> >> the
> >> >> press Sunday. He seems to want to out Cheney, Cheney. The American
> >> >> Public,
> >> >> according to him, doesn't understand the war, and We need to "stay the
> >> >> course" and Supersize it. Much as we might like to turn Iraq into a
> >> >> parking
> >> >> lot, the generals correctly point out, it won't win.
> >> >>
> >> >> And You? Who are you for or against at this point? (see if you can
> >> >> talk
> >> >> about candidates without name calling, eh)
> >> >
> >> > Me mud slinging, look at yourself and your buddies. Everytime you post
> >> > something it's a hateful comment against the president or someone in
> >> > his
> >> > administration. YOU are the mud slinger.
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> My goodness, a bit defensive, aren't we.[/color]
> >
> > Not really, just replicating a response by you, thin skinned are you?
> > --
> >[/color]
> I see, running out of things to rant about? Here, let me help you out:
>
> "Some of the very activists who helped propel the Democrats to a majority in
> the House and Senate last week are claiming credit for the victories and
> demanding what they consider their due: a set of ambitious - and politically
> provocative - actions on gun control, abortion, national security and other
> issues that party leaders fear could alienate moderate voters and leave
> Democrats vulnerable to GOP attacks as big spenders or soft on terrorism."
> Full article:
> [url]http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na-dems12nov12,0,45338[/url]
> 42.story?track=mostviewed-homepage
>
> Knock yourself out running on about this or that[/color]

Just a smoke screen.
--