OT: Liberals wish list

<http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html>

Let the fun begin, LOL.
--

dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url][color=green]
> >[/color]
>
> Let the fun begin, LOL.[/color]

Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
liberal agenda is all about?

In article <xn0ettzya1abvr0000@news.readfreenews.net>,
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
> > <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url][color=darkred]
> > >[/color]
> >
> > Let the fun begin, LOL.[/color]
>
> Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
> liberal agenda is all about?[/color]

They are obsessed with it.
--

On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 16:51:35 -0600, dbu' <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
><http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html>
>
>Let the fun begin, LOL.[/color]

I think we should tell the Navy to allow friggin in the riggin....


--

Scott in Florida

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-C29AFD.17192217112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <xn0ettzya1abvr0000@news.readfreenews.net>,
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url]
>> > >
>> >
>> > Let the fun begin, LOL.[/color]
>>
>> Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
>> liberal agenda is all about?[/color]
>
> They are obsessed with it.
> --
>[/color]

Who do you think is driving the redefinition of marriage? Our butt-humping
friends from the Left Coast and Bill's friends in the DNC, or is that DMZ?
<GD&RRF>

Charles of Schaumburg

Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever consider
one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for right
wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many rightwingers
will be voting Democratic next time around.



"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:CYednZgQJ4UaycPYnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=blue]
>
> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-C29AFD.17192217112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
>> In article <xn0ettzya1abvr0000@news.readfreenews.net>,
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> > <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url]
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Let the fun begin, LOL.
>>>
>>> Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
>>> liberal agenda is all about?[/color]
>>
>> They are obsessed with it.
>> --
>>[/color]
>
> Who do you think is driving the redefinition of marriage? Our
> butt-humping friends from the Left Coast and Bill's friends in the DNC, or
> is that DMZ? <GD&RRF>
>
> Charles of Schaumburg
>[/color]

Not after they realize what they have to offer. Just wait.


"Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:Fit7h.180$tM1.62@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=blue]
> Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
> marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever
> consider one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for
> right wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many
> rightwingers will be voting Democratic next time around.
>
>
>
> "n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:CYednZgQJ4UaycPYnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=green]
>>
>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>> news:repubs-C29AFD.17192217112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>>> In article <xn0ettzya1abvr0000@news.readfreenews.net>,
>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url]
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > Let the fun begin, LOL.
>>>>
>>>> Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
>>>> liberal agenda is all about?
>>>
>>> They are obsessed with it.
>>> --
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Who do you think is driving the redefinition of marriage? Our
>> butt-humping friends from the Left Coast and Bill's friends in the DNC,
>> or is that DMZ? <GD&RRF>
>>
>> Charles of Schaumburg
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:25:57 GMT, "Art"
<begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
>marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever consider
>one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for right
>wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many rightwingers
>will be voting Democratic next time around.[/color]

We won't break up your gay marriage, Art...



--

Scott in Florida

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 02:36:33 GMT, "Roadrunner NG"
<RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Not after they realize what they have to offer. Just wait.[/color]

After 2 years with this idiotic Pelosi...Dims will be voting
Republican....LOL


--

Scott in Florida

In article <b7usl214tf7nvb5vi5aqfvhv9cuh9obauh@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:25:57 GMT, "Art"
> <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
> >marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever consider
> >one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for right
> >wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many rightwingers
> >will be voting Democratic next time around.[/color]
>
> We won't break up your gay marriage, Art...[/color]

If this article <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15769199/> would have been
published and made the front pages two days before the election, the
Republicans would have won control of both houses again.
--

On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 06:22:15 -0600, dbu' <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>In article <b7usl214tf7nvb5vi5aqfvhv9cuh9obauh@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:25:57 GMT, "Art"
>> <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
>> >marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever consider
>> >one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for right
>> >wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many rightwingers
>> >will be voting Democratic next time around.[/color]
>>
>> We won't break up your gay marriage, Art...[/color]
>
>If this article <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15769199/> would have been
>published and made the front pages two days before the election, the
>Republicans would have won control of both houses again.[/color]

I mis read that gals sign to be 'Keep your Paws off my Body'...and
thought....no problem....LOL


--

Scott in Florida

"Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote in message
news:Rku7h.8125$gl5.3410@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> Not after they realize what they have to offer. Just wait.
>
>
> "Art" <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:Fit7h.180$tM1.62@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...[color=green]
>> Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
>> marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever
>> consider one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for
>> right wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many
>> rightwingers will be voting Democratic next time around.
>>
>>
>>
>> "n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:CYednZgQJ4UaycPYnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>> news:repubs-C29AFD.17192217112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>> In article <xn0ettzya1abvr0000@news.readfreenews.net>,
>>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dbu', 11/17/2006,5:51:35 PM, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > <[url]http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/17/liberal.wishlist.ap/index.html[/url]
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Let the fun begin, LOL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gosh, it's all about more sex and more homosexuals. Is that what the
>>>>> liberal agenda is all about?
>>>>
>>>> They are obsessed with it.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>>> Who do you think is driving the redefinition of marriage? Our
>>> butt-humping friends from the Left Coast and Bill's friends in the DNC,
>>> or is that DMZ? <GD&RRF>
>>>
>>> Charles of Schaumburg
>>>[/color]
>>
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]

And what do the port-sided butt-humping Left Coasties have to offer America
that is any damned good at all? Not one damned thing. Just sick, twisted
perversion, passed off as normal. The same thing they've been trying to do
since 1925!

Charles of Schaumburg

"dbu'" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-C1A535.06221518112006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <b7usl214tf7nvb5vi5aqfvhv9cuh9obauh@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:25:57 GMT, "Art"
>> <begunaNOSPAMPLEASE@mindspring.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >Too bad for the right wing that in 2008 there will be no more anti gay
>> >marriage laws to vote for. Just about every state that would ever
>> >consider
>> >one has already voted on it so there won't be a dumb reason for right
>> >wingers to go to the polls. Doesn't matter much anyway. Many
>> >rightwingers
>> >will be voting Democratic next time around.[/color]
>>
>> We won't break up your gay marriage, Art...[/color]
>
> If this article <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15769199/> would have been
> published and made the front pages two days before the election, the
> Republicans would have won control of both houses again.
> --
>[/color]

But then again that's what the Left has always really wanted. They just
hid it long enough to get elected. When America finds out, there will be
hell to pay.

I'm waiting for them to try to revise Hillary Healthcare. That's what got
the Republican Revolution going in 1994. People had more than enough of the
smart-ass from Park Ridge, also known as the Wicked Witch of Arkansas and
now known as the Carpetbagger in Reverse. . . . Is everyone in the f***ing
state of New Jerk-off mentaly dead? Who voted for Hillary? Then again,
here in Illinois, the Dems got everything, but then, the Dems have more
voters they can dig up than the Republicans do. . . . My grandfathers used
to vote Democrat, and probably still are. . ..

Charles of Schaumburg