|
Re: OT Wal Mart Health Insurance
In article <hOCcnaA1E-w76v_YUSdV9g@ptd.net>,
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> He must have skipped economics 101. As usual our good friend dizzy AKA
> Troll, Moron, Idiot, Dumbass, Bumbshit, Twit, Bigot, Engineer and proven
> pathological liar gets it wrong once again. The folks that once worked in
> the Mom and Pop store, that Wal Mart put out of business because they could
> not compete, are now making more money and getting better benefits
> than when they worked in the M & P stores LOL
>
> mike hunt[/color]
He could have flunked it.
[color=blue]
>
>
> "dizzy AKA Troll, Moron, Idiot, Dumbass, Bumbshit shit, Twit Bigot Engineer
> and proven pathological liar" <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
> news:ccg4m2dom9qdbbbsq2896vrn4eq3ahliu6@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > Mark A wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>But the question is whether Wal-Mart is any worse than its competitors
> >>(large retailers and the small shops that frequently go out of business
> >>when
> >>a Wal_mart is opened). The answer is that for retail workers, Wal-Mart has
> >>above average benefits.[/color]
> >
> > Cite, please, because I think you're full of it.
> >
> > Wal-Mart is the market leader. Them being "no worse than their
> > competitors" is unimpressive. Wal-Mart is the one who everyone must
> > follow in order to survive in the market. If Wal-Mart drives-down
> > product costs by buying everything from China, it's competitors must
> > also. If Wal-Mart drives-down labor costs, it's competitors must
> > also.
> >[/color][/color]
--
|