OT Dims want to raise gas prices!

Surprise, Surprise....

The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....

[url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]

--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> Surprise, Surprise....
>
> The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
>
> [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.

In article <gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Surprise, Surprise....
>
> The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
>
> [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&[/url]
> TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/color]


Yep, they'll screw things up royally.


"Topping the list for repeal are:
-Tax breaks for refinery expansion and for geological studies to help
oil exploration.
-A measure passed two years ago primarily to promote domestic
manufacturing. It allows oil companies to take a tax credit if they
chose to drill in this country instead of going abroad."
--

I like how Dims disguise their socialist efforts as "Tax the corporations".

First of all, think about it, Corporations don't pay taxes, people do.

Gas tax, Poor pay the most as a percentage of their income. Dims like it.
Fair?

Raise taxes on companies, raise prices on people or go out of buisness, duh!

Less jobs, higher prices, Dims like it.

With all the dominant liberal media they get cover for such policies.

Oh yeah, minimum wage = inflation & less jobs, that's OK with the dims as
long as they get elected.

The dummies/dimmies that believe artificial socialist minimum wage hikes
help them are also too dumb to get voter IDs, which gives the dims more
cover for their election fraud.............


"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> Surprise, Surprise....
>
> The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
>
> [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:32:47 GMT, "Roadrunner NG"
<RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>I like how Dims disguise their socialist efforts as "Tax the corporations".
>
>First of all, think about it, Corporations don't pay taxes, people do.
>
>Gas tax, Poor pay the most as a percentage of their income. Dims like it.
>Fair?
>
>Raise taxes on companies, raise prices on people or go out of buisness, duh!
>
>Less jobs, higher prices, Dims like it.
>
>With all the dominant liberal media they get cover for such policies.
>
>Oh yeah, minimum wage = inflation & less jobs, that's OK with the dims as
>long as they get elected.
>
>The dummies/dimmies that believe artificial socialist minimum wage hikes
>help them are also too dumb to get voter IDs, which gives the dims more
>cover for their election fraud.............[/color]

Watch out....

All those ideas will bring the local Dims down on ya....LOL

Truth seems it infuriate these Dims...

I'll keep throwing turds in the punch bowl to get them stirred up.

You are most welcome here!



--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:knu1m2hbh55uagcfi89prka3iimhvkel02@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 00:32:47 GMT, "Roadrunner NG"
> <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>I like how Dims disguise their socialist efforts as "Tax the
>>corporations".
>>
>>First of all, think about it, Corporations don't pay taxes, people do.
>>
>>Gas tax, Poor pay the most as a percentage of their income. Dims like it.
>>Fair?
>>
>>Raise taxes on companies, raise prices on people or go out of buisness,
>>duh!
>>
>>Less jobs, higher prices, Dims like it.
>>
>>With all the dominant liberal media they get cover for such policies.
>>
>>Oh yeah, minimum wage = inflation & less jobs, that's OK with the dims as
>>long as they get elected.
>>
>>The dummies/dimmies that believe artificial socialist minimum wage hikes
>>help them are also too dumb to get voter IDs, which gives the dims more
>>cover for their election fraud.............[/color]
>
> Watch out....
>
> All those ideas will bring the local Dims down on ya....LOL
>
> Truth seems it infuriate these Dims...
>
> I'll keep throwing turds in the punch bowl to get them stirred up.
>
> You are most welcome here!
>
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

To borrow a line I saw in a movie once and throw at the LIEberals:

"The Truth. You can't handle the truth."

And they can't. The truth might expose their bull. . . .

Charles of Schaumburg

Oh no, another Economics drop-out...

What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?


JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=blue]
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > Surprise, Surprise....
> >
> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> >
> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> >
> > Scott in Florida
> >[/color]
>
> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.[/color]

Mark wrote:[color=blue]
> Oh no, another Econo[/color]

Notice what a moron this guy is yet, Joe? Sad sack we have here.
[color=blue]
>
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=green]
> > "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> > news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
> > > Surprise, Surprise....
> > >
> > > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> > >
> > > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> > >
> > > Scott in Florida
> > >[/color]
> >
> > That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
> > price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.[/color][/color]

"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=green]
>> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
>> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
>> > Surprise, Surprise....
>> >
>> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
>> >
>> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
>> >
>> > Scott in Florida
>> >[/color]
>>
>> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
>> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.[/color]
>[/color]
[color=blue]
> Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
>
> What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
> to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
> prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
> alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
>[/color]

1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.

2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was it
even implied.

3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.

n5hsr wrote:[color=blue]
>[/color]
<snip />[color=blue]
>
> To borrow a line I saw in a movie once and throw at the LIEberals:
>
> "The Truth. You can't handle the truth."
>
> And they can't. The truth might expose their bull. . . .
>
> Charles of Scumbag[/color]

How could you post so much, yet say so little? If we took away all of
your RUSH quotes, you'd have nothing left to say.

Oh you have me killfiled, don't you my little cockroach?

Dude, the Dims believe the oil companies are making excessive profits
and want to limit those, therefore they are indirectly setting
prices... haven't you had your coffee yet???

Richard, time to schedule another visit to the doctor...


JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=blue]
> "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
> >
> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> >> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...
> >> > Surprise, Surprise....
> >> >
> >> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> >> >
> >> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> >> >
> >> > Scott in Florida
> >> >
> >>
> >> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
> >> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.[/color]
> >[/color]
>[color=green]
> > Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
> >
> > What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
> > to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
> > prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
> > alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
> >[/color]
>
> 1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
> impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.
>
> 2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was it
> even implied.
>
> 3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
> speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
> result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.[/color]

"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1164030620.382972.17160@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=green]
>> "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
>> >
>> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> >> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...
>> >> > Surprise, Surprise....
>> >> >
>> >> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
>> >> >
>> >> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
>> >> >
>> >> > Scott in Florida
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence
>> >> that
>> >> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.
>> >[/color]
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
>> >
>> > What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
>> > to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
>> > prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
>> > alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
>> >[/color]
>>
>> 1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
>> impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.
>>
>> 2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was
>> it
>> even implied.
>>
>> 3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
>> speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
>> result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.[/color]
>[/color]

[color=blue]
> Dude, the Dims believe the oil companies are making excessive profits
> and want to limit those, therefore they are indirectly setting
> prices... haven't you had your coffee yet???[/color]

Over 50 cents of the recent price swings was based on vapor. No decrease in
supply, no threat to supply, no material change to the business at all.
Purely game playing. You would never put up with that with any other
product, if you had a choice.

Mark wrote:[color=blue]
> Dude, the Dims believe the oil companies are making excessive profits
> and want to limit those, therefore they are indirectly setting
> prices... haven't you had your coffee yet???
>
> Richard, time to schedule another visit to the doctor...[/color]

I didn't even post the BELOW reply, you top-posting jackass.

Yeah you keep taking it in the ass from ExxonMobil, twit.
[color=blue]
>
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=green]
> > "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> > >
> > > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> > >> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> > >> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...
> > >> > Surprise, Surprise....
> > >> >
> > >> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> > >> >
> > >> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> > >> >
> > >> > Scott in Florida
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence that
> > >> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.
> > >[/color]
> >[color=darkred]
> > > Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
> > >
> > > What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
> > > to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
> > > prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
> > > alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
> > >[/color]
> >
> > 1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
> > impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.
> >
> > 2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was it
> > even implied.
> >
> > 3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
> > speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
> > result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.[/color][/color]

The market is efficient but there are always fluctuations while the
price reaches equilibrium as conditions change. A lot of people bet on
bad weather and $100 oil this summer and jumped into oil. They are now
getting burned because the conditions they forecast never materialized.
That's how the market works sometimes. It's efficient and a heckuva
lot better than some numbskull politician deciding that profits are
"excessive". When profits go up, more supply comes on board and prices
decrease as supply and demand equalize. It's basic macro-economics,
not that I would expect Richard to be able to understand.


JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=blue]
> "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1164030620.382972.17160@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
> >
> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> >> >> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...
> >> >> > Surprise, Surprise....
> >> >> >
> >> >> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Scott in Florida
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence
> >> >> that
> >> >> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.
> >> >
> >>
> >> > Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
> >> >
> >> > What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
> >> > to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
> >> > prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
> >> > alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
> >> >
> >>
> >> 1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
> >> impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.
> >>
> >> 2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was
> >> it
> >> even implied.
> >>
> >> 3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
> >> speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
> >> result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.[/color]
> >[/color]
>
>[color=green]
> > Dude, the Dims believe the oil companies are making excessive profits
> > and want to limit those, therefore they are indirectly setting
> > prices... haven't you had your coffee yet???[/color]
>
> Over 50 cents of the recent price swings was based on vapor. No decrease in
> supply, no threat to supply, no material change to the business at all.
> Purely game playing. You would never put up with that with any other
> product, if you had a choice.[/color]

Mark wrote:[color=blue]
> The market is efficient but there are always fluctuations while the
> price reaches equilibrium as conditions change. A lot of people bet on
> bad weather and $100 oil this summer and jumped into oil. They are now
> getting burned because the conditions they forecast never materialized.
> That's how the market works sometimes. It's efficient and a heckuva
> lot better than some numbskull politician deciding that profits are
> "excessive". When profits go up, more supply comes on board and prices
> decrease as supply and demand equalize. It's basic macro-economics,
> not that I would expect Richard to be able to understand.
>[/color]

I haven't even posted my opinion you stupid fuck. What, are you afraid
of confronting Joe directly? PUSSY
[color=blue]
>
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:[color=green]
> > "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:1164030620.382972.17160@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> > >
> > > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> > >> "Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:1164029347.080171.275710@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > >> >
> > >> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> > >> >> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> > >> >> news:gmp0m2di425sdtnlblrfavfhd2gnpc7v9s@4ax.com...
> > >> >> > Surprise, Surprise....
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The Dims want to raise taxes and gas prices....
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [url]http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CONGRESS_ENERGY?SITE=7219&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2006-11-19-03-54-44[/url]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Scott in Florida
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >> That's not what the article says, dummy. And, you have no evidence
> > >> >> that
> > >> >> price hikes would be the result of the legislation described.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> > Oh no, another Economics drop-out...
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think happens to the price when it becomes more expensive
> > >> > to explore for new sources? Do you think the government should set
> > >> > prices or should there be a balance of supply and demand? Which
> > >> > alternative results in a shortage of gasoline?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> 1) Without knowing the actual numbers, you have no way of knowing what
> > >> impact the increased taxes would have on the final price.
> > >>
> > >> 2) The article said nothing about the government setting prices, nor was
> > >> it
> > >> even implied.
> > >>
> > >> 3) The major price swings we've seen over the past year were due more to
> > >> speculation in oil futures. The most recent drop, however, came as the
> > >> result of the success of Jack #2 well, by Chevron.
> > >[/color]
> >
> >[color=darkred]
> > > Dude, the Dims believe the oil companies are making excessive profits
> > > and want to limit those, therefore they are indirectly setting
> > > prices... haven't you had your coffee yet???[/color]
> >
> > Over 50 cents of the recent price swings was based on vapor. No decrease in
> > supply, no threat to supply, no material change to the business at all.
> > Purely game playing. You would never put up with that with any other
> > product, if you had a choice.[/color][/color]