OT - Mary Cheney's news

Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just here.
<g>

Cathy

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just here.
> <g>
>
> Cathy[/color]


This should be interesting. dbu and Snott from Florida should be apoplectic
by later this evening.

In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just here.
> <g>
>
> Cathy[/color]

Could you explain this development.
--

" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>> here.
>> <g>
>>
>> Cathy[/color]
>
> Could you explain this development.
> --
>[/color]

"The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances of
Mary Cheney's pregnancy."

If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.

" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>> here.
>> <g>
>>
>> Cathy[/color]
>
> Could you explain this development.[/color]

What? As in how she got pregnant, you mean? Nope, don't know; apparently
they're not letting that particular cat out of the bag. Wasn't her partner,
though. ;-)

Cathy
[color=blue]
> --
>[/color]

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...[color=blue]
>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>> here.
>>> <g>
>>>
>>> Cathy[/color]
>>
>> Could you explain this development.
>> --
>>[/color]
>
> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances of
> Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>
> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.[/color]

Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But there
is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows, non-IDed
donor, for example...

Cathy
[color=blue]
>
>[/color]

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...[color=green]
>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>> here.
>>>> <g>
>>>>
>>>> Cathy
>>>
>>> Could you explain this development.
>>> --
>>>[/color]
>>
>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances
>> of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>
>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.[/color]
>
> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
> non-IDed donor, for example...
>
> Cathy[/color]

Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most innocent
questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be some
grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in the
face.

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ZlJdh.7051$ya1.946@news02.roc.ny...[color=blue]
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=green]
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...[color=darkred]
>>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>>> here.
>>>>> <g>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cathy
>>>>
>>>> Could you explain this development.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>
>>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances
>>> of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>>
>>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned
>>> business.[/color]
>>
>> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
>> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
>> non-IDed donor, for example...
>>
>> Cathy[/color]
>
> Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most innocent
> questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be some
> grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in the
> face.[/color]

True. But, in reality, how often is that question asked, or how often are
hints along that line (sometimes repeatedly) made? A *lot*. To the great
annoyance of the recipient(s)!

Cathy
[color=blue]
>
>[/color]

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:sNCdnYRnh5_u_urYnZ2dnUVZ_oannZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ZlJdh.7051$ya1.946@news02.roc.ny...[color=green]
>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
>> news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...
>>>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>> <g>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cathy
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you explain this development.
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances
>>>> of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>>>
>>>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned
>>>> business.
>>>
>>> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
>>> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
>>> non-IDed donor, for example...
>>>
>>> Cathy[/color]
>>
>> Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most
>> innocent questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be
>> some grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in
>> the face.[/color]
>
> True. But, in reality, how often is that question asked, or how often are
> hints along that line (sometimes repeatedly) made? A *lot*. To the great
> annoyance of the recipient(s)!
>
> Cathy[/color]

There are so many ways to respond to these questions! Woman, responding to
that question from a female friend: "Baby? Soon, actually. And, I'm sure
it'll look just like your sweet husband!"

In article <LrCdnZOpxubw_erYnZ2dnUVZ_oGlnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> " dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
> >> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
> >> here.
> >> <g>
> >>
> >> Cathy[/color]
> >
> > Could you explain this development.[/color]
>
> What? As in how she got pregnant, you mean? Nope, don't know; apparently
> they're not letting that particular cat out of the bag. Wasn't her partner,
> though. ;-)
>
> Cathy[/color]

I guess they are progressive, yes?
--

In article <meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> " dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> > "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
> >> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
> >> here.
> >> <g>
> >>
> >> Cathy[/color]
> >
> > Could you explain this development.
> > --
> >[/color]
>
> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances of
> Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>
> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.[/color]

Is this too much for you to handle joe?
--

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...[color=green]
>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>> here.
>>>> <g>
>>>>
>>>> Cathy
>>>
>>> Could you explain this development.
>>> --
>>>[/color]
>>
>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances
>> of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>
>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned business.[/color]
>
> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
> non-IDed donor, for example...
>
> Cathy
>[/color]

Well, there is another possibility, but that would require three wise men on
camels in attendance[color=blue][color=green]
>>
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:sNCdnYRnh5_u_urYnZ2dnUVZ_oannZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:ZlJdh.7051$ya1.946@news02.roc.ny...[color=green]
>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
>> news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...
>>>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>>>> here.
>>>>>> <g>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cathy
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you explain this development.
>>>>
>>>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the circumstances
>>>> of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>>>
>>>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned
>>>> business.
>>>
>>> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
>>> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
>>> non-IDed donor, for example...
>>>
>>> Cathy[/color]
>>
>> Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most
>> innocent questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be
>> some grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in
>> the face.[/color]
>
> True. But, in reality, how often is that question asked, or how often are
> hints along that line (sometimes repeatedly) made? A *lot*. To the great
> annoyance of the recipient(s)!
>
> Cathy[/color]

I don't recall that we ever got asked that. However, we were the first of
our circle of college friends to have children and we were asked, "What went
wrong?" That's pretty annoying, too.

And if you have four (we do), sometimes you get asked something similar to,
"Do you know anything about sex?" The appropriate answer is, "Yes,
obviously."

The one thing that really gets me is relative strangers - or even friends -
touching my wife's stomach. It's creepy and it's annoying. I absolutely
hate that and my wife likes it even less.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

"dh" <dh@stargate.com> wrote in message
news:4577645f$1$15489$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...[color=blue]
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> news:sNCdnYRnh5_u_urYnZ2dnUVZ_oannZ2d@giganews.com...[color=green]
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:ZlJdh.7051$ya1.946@news02.roc.ny...[color=darkred]
>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
>>> news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...
>>>>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
>>>>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>> <g>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cathy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you explain this development.
>>>>>
>>>>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the
>>>>> circumstances of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
>>>>>
>>>>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned
>>>>> business.
>>>>
>>>> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
>>>> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
>>>> non-IDed donor, for example...
>>>>
>>>> Cathy
>>>
>>> Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most
>>> innocent questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be
>>> some grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in
>>> the face.[/color]
>>
>> True. But, in reality, how often is that question asked, or how often
>> are hints along that line (sometimes repeatedly) made? A *lot*. To the
>> great annoyance of the recipient(s)!
>>
>> Cathy[/color]
>
> I don't recall that we ever got asked that. However, we were the first of
> our circle of college friends to have children and we were asked, "What
> went wrong?" That's pretty annoying, too.[/color]

Not to mention rude.
[color=blue]
> And if you have four (we do), sometimes you get asked something similar
> to, "Do you know anything about sex?" The appropriate answer is, "Yes,
> obviously."[/color]

;-)
[color=blue]
> The one thing that really gets me is relative strangers - or even
> friends - touching my wife's stomach. It's creepy and it's annoying. I
> absolutely hate that and my wife likes it even less.[/color]

I don't blame her! Talk about invasion of personal space. (OTOH, I realize
that different people have different touchy-feely quotients, & those with
the higher ones probably don't think a thing of it.)

Cathy

[color=blue]
>[/color]

In article <VaadnRXmh4Pg7urYnZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "dh" <dh@stargate.com> wrote in message
> news:4577645f$1$15489$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...[color=green]
> > "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> > news:sNCdnYRnh5_u_urYnZ2dnUVZ_oannZ2d@giganews.com...[color=darkred]
> >> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> news:ZlJdh.7051$ya1.946@news02.roc.ny...
> >>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:DeCdnSzuwuCB_OrYnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews.com...
> >>>>
> >>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>>> news:meJdh.6960$Ka1.5073@news01.roc.ny...
> >>>>>" dbu," <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:repubs-4C5815.18231806122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >>>>>> In article <meudnfdBKtJ2wOrYnZ2dnUVZ_h-dnZ2d@giganews.com>,
> >>>>>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Reported to be pregnant, due in the spring. Now, this could prove
> >>>>>>> interesting, re: conservatives' reaction(s)... Countrywide, or just
> >>>>>>> here.
> >>>>>>> <g>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cathy
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Could you explain this development.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "The vice president's office declined to elaborate on the
> >>>>> circumstances of Mary Cheney's pregnancy."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you're too stupid to figure it out, it's none of your damned
> >>>>> business.
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, it's actually no one's business but hers - & her partner's. But
> >>>> there is more than one possibility. If donor sperm - person she knows,
> >>>> non-IDed donor, for example...
> >>>>
> >>>> Cathy
> >>>
> >>> Reproductive issues are none of ANYBODY'S business. Even the most
> >>> innocent questions like (parents to son/daughter) "When will there be
> >>> some grandchildren?" should be met with disdain, and maybe even a pie in
> >>> the face.
> >>
> >> True. But, in reality, how often is that question asked, or how often
> >> are hints along that line (sometimes repeatedly) made? A *lot*. To the
> >> great annoyance of the recipient(s)!
> >>
> >> Cathy[/color]
> >
> > I don't recall that we ever got asked that. However, we were the first of
> > our circle of college friends to have children and we were asked, "What
> > went wrong?" That's pretty annoying, too.[/color]
>
> Not to mention rude.
>[color=green]
> > And if you have four (we do), sometimes you get asked something similar
> > to, "Do you know anything about sex?" The appropriate answer is, "Yes,
> > obviously."[/color]
>
> ;-)
>[color=green]
> > The one thing that really gets me is relative strangers - or even
> > friends - touching my wife's stomach. It's creepy and it's annoying. I
> > absolutely hate that and my wife likes it even less.[/color]
>
> I don't blame her! Talk about invasion of personal space. (OTOH, I realize
> that different people have different touchy-feely quotients, & those with
> the higher ones probably don't think a thing of it.)
>
> Cathy
>
>[color=green]
> >[/color][/color]

Isn't she a ... lesbian? How ?? Just curious.
--