OT TIME TO IMPEACH

Just IN:

George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.

A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
to impeach.

Learning Richard, 12/8/2006, 8:03:01 AM,
<1165582981.266077.84620@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Just IN:
>
> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.
>
> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
> to impeach.[/color]

Go ahead and get your congressmen started on the process. Let's see
how many others are on board with this idea.

"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165582981.266077.84620@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Just IN:
>
> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.
>
> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
> to impeach.
>[/color]

Time to boot your sorry ***-loving arse out of this newsgroup.

"sharx35" <sharx35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:sAdeh.40914$rv4.15426@edtnps90...[color=blue]
>
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1165582981.266077.84620@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
>> Just IN:
>>
>> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.
>>
>> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
>> to impeach.
>>[/color]
>
> Time to boot your sorry ***-loving arse out of this newsgroup.[/color]

Richard's in love with you? This is news.

I'm sure President Bush is just quaking knowing that you feel he should
be impeached. Maybe you should drive by the White House and hold up a
sign or something. Better yet, why don't you take a gun with you?



Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> Just IN:
>
> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.
>
> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
> to impeach.[/color]

Mark, 12/8/2006, 9:04:04 AM,
<1165586644.693734.4330@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> I'm sure President Bush is just quaking knowing that you feel he
> should be impeached. Maybe you should drive by the White House and
> hold up a sign or something. Better yet, why don't you take a gun
> with you?[/color]

You know Richard is secretly a President Bush admirer. Why else would
he be constantly vilifying the president? It's his convoluted way of
showing appreciation for the job he's done.

--
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere,
diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." ~ Groucho
Marx

Isn't it just like the Dimocrats? Don't support your president when your
country is at war, just worry about impeaching him so you can get even for
the Clinton Impeachment at any cost!

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0eupx83wyg9zc001@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Mark, 12/8/2006, 9:04:04 AM,
> <1165586644.693734.4330@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> I'm sure President Bush is just quaking knowing that you feel he
>> should be impeached. Maybe you should drive by the White House and
>> hold up a sign or something. Better yet, why don't you take a gun
>> with you?[/color]
>
> You know Richard is secretly a President Bush admirer. Why else would
> he be constantly vilifying the president? It's his convoluted way of
> showing appreciation for the job he's done.
>
> --
> "Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere,
> diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies." ~ Groucho
> Marx[/color]

"Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote in message
news:eEeeh.8133$xC4.7569@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> Isn't it just like the Dimocrats? Don't support your president when your
> country is at war, just worry about impeaching him so you can get even for
> the Clinton Impeachment at any cost![/color]

Here we go again.

Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our right
to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government if we're at
war?

JoeSpareBedroom, 12/8/2006, 9:37:37 AM,
<RMeeh.7161$ya1.3221@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote in message
> news:eEeeh.8133$xC4.7569@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=green]
> > Isn't it just like the Dimocrats? Don't support your president when
> > your country is at war, just worry about impeaching him so you can
> > get even for the Clinton Impeachment at any cost![/color]
>
> Here we go again.
>
> Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our
> right to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government
> if we're at war?[/color]

Joe, you live to criticize. Is there anything good the current
administration has done or has your hate blinded you to everything?

--
"The envious man thinks that if his neighbor breaks a leg, he will be
able to walk better himself." ~ Helmut Schoeck

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0eupxsfwz9pi3002@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 12/8/2006, 9:37:37 AM,
> <RMeeh.7161$ya1.3221@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote in message
>> news:eEeeh.8133$xC4.7569@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=darkred]
>> > Isn't it just like the Dimocrats? Don't support your president when
>> > your country is at war, just worry about impeaching him so you can
>> > get even for the Clinton Impeachment at any cost![/color]
>>
>> Here we go again.
>>
>> Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our
>> right to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government
>> if we're at war?[/color]
>
> Joe, you live to criticize. Is there anything good the current
> administration has done or has your hate blinded you to everything?[/color]


Before you respond with anything else, point out where in MY last paragraph
you see criticism. Because you are easily muddled, here's the paragraph
again:

"Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our right
to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government if we're at
war?"

Quote the exact words which you think contain criticism.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0eupvagwvso52000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Learning Richard, 12/8/2006, 8:03:01 AM,
> <1165582981.266077.84620@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Just IN:
>>
>> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.
>>
>> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
>> to impeach.[/color]
>
> Go ahead and get your congressmen started on the process. Let's see
> how many others are on board with this idea.[/color]


Aw, LR just needs a high colonic to clear his mind. . . .

Followed by a 20 mile hike in the snow.

Charles of Schaumburg

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:03:01 -0800, Learning Richard wrote:
[color=blue]
> Just IN:
>
> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.[/color]

I don't blame him.
[color=blue]
>
> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
> to impeach.[/color]

What law did he break, again?

Remember, Congress implemented the War Powers Act (Actually, it was never
closed after WWII!). But with WPA in effect, the President can do whatever
he sees fit for the cause of the war.

Simply because he doesn't embrace a report is no reason for impeachment...

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
news:xugeh.10$A05.1@trndny08...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:03:01 -0800, Learning Richard wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Just IN:
>>
>> George W Bush will NOT embrace the Iraq Study Group's report in toto.[/color]
>
> I don't blame him.
>[color=green]
>>
>> A lot of Democrats drew a line in the sand, and Bush crossed it. Time
>> to impeach.[/color]
>
> What law did he break, again?
>
> Remember, Congress implemented the War Powers Act (Actually, it was never
> closed after WWII!). But with WPA in effect, the President can do whatever
> he sees fit for the cause of the war.
>
> Simply because he doesn't embrace a report is no reason for impeachment...
>[/color]

Well....sorta maybe. He's clung to a failed strategy for 3 years, and he's
apparently not in the mood to listen to adults who are smarter and more
experienced than he is. This attitude will lead to MORE pointless deaths.
Since the attitude signifies intent, that makes him a murderer.

JoeSpareBedroom, 12/8/2006, 9:46:58 AM,
<CVeeh.7163$ya1.6583@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0eupxsfwz9pi3002@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 12/8/2006, 9:37:37 AM,
> ><RMeeh.7161$ya1.3221@news02.roc.ny> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>"Roadrunner NG" <RRNG@highlandcraft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:eEeeh.8133$xC4.7569@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> >>> Isn't it just like the Dimocrats? Don't support your president[/color][/color]
> when >>> your country is at war, just worry about impeaching him so
> you can >>> get even for the Clinton Impeachment at any cost![color=green][color=darkred]
> > >
> > > Here we go again.
> > >
> > > Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend
> > > our right to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the
> > > government if we're at war?[/color]
> >
> > Joe, you live to criticize. Is there anything good the current
> > administration has done or has your hate blinded you to everything?[/color]
>
>
> Before you respond with anything else, point out where in MY last
> paragraph you see criticism. Because you are easily muddled, here's
> the paragraph again:
>
> "Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our
> right to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government
> if we're at war?"
>
> Quote the exact words which you think contain criticism.[/color]

Can't see past your own nose, can you?

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0euq140x3sd5w004@news.readfreenews.net...

[color=blue][color=green]
>> "Are you saying that when the country's at war, we should suspend our
>> right to free speech? We're not allowed to criticize the government
>> if we're at war?"
>>
>> Quote the exact words which you think contain criticism.[/color]
>
> Can't see past your own nose, can you?[/color]


I asked you a question, above. I expect an answer. Want it phrased
differently? Here:

Do you believe that citizens should be silenced, as they are in North Korea,
Communist China, and Russia?