OT My Senator is a Traitor!

[url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]

I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!

I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.

There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy!


--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>
> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>
> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>
> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]

If you have no conversations w/the enemy, you are not liable to get
anywhere, except in deeper dire straits. The hate (& possible
misunderstandings) will build & build & build...

As someone (Jimmy Carter?) recently pointed out (re: dialogue w/the enemy),
did we halt all dialogue w/ the Soviet Union during the Cold war? No. Did
we blow each other to smithereens? No.

Cathy

[color=blue]
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

In article <ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>
> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>
> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>
> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]

This type of diplomacy has been tried in the past with varying sucess.
Worth a try, but I'm not optimistic. History shows they have not been
very cooperative. It may even have been a GWB intitiative.
--

In article <NbKdncsPUOreBx3YnZ2dnUVZ_vamnZ2d@giganews.com>,
"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
> >
> > I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
> >
> > I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
> >
> > There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]
>
> If you have no conversations w/the enemy, you are not liable to get
> anywhere, except in deeper dire straits. The hate (& possible
> misunderstandings) will build & build & build...
>
> As someone (Jimmy Carter?) recently pointed out (re: dialogue w/the enemy),
> did we halt all dialogue w/ the Soviet Union during the Cold war? No. Did
> we blow each other to smithereens? No.
>
> Cathy[/color]

Jimmie was not very good at building relations with the Iranians. It
looked good at first, but the radical islamic terrorists ultimately
killed Anwar Sadat who seemed to be in favor of peace with Israel.

Do we still need more education on radical islamic terrorists?
--

You wrote:
[color=blue]
> but the radical islamic terrorists ultimately
> killed Anwar Sadat who seemed to be in favor of peace with Israel.[/color]

As opposed to the radical Jewish terrorist who killed Yitzhak Rabin, who
seemed to be in favor of peace with Palestinians.
[color=blue]
> Do we still need more education on radical islamic terrorists?[/color]

Apparently you need more education about a lot of things.

You wrote:
[color=blue]
> It may even have been a GWB intitiative.[/color]

And I'm sure GWB spells it "intitiative", too.

In article <Xns9898DA320E325Alotta***ina@66.250.146.128>,
Alotta ***ina <alotta@***ina.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> You wrote:
>[color=green]
> > but the radical islamic terrorists ultimately
> > killed Anwar Sadat who seemed to be in favor of peace with Israel.[/color]
>
> As opposed to the radical Jewish terrorist who killed Yitzhak Rabin, who
> seemed to be in favor of peace with Palestinians.
>[color=green]
> > Do we still need more education on radical islamic terrorists?[/color]
>
> Apparently you need more education about a lot of things.[/color]

You are a radical islamic I take it?
--

In article <Xns9898DA4CFBBE6Alotta***ina@66.250.146.128>,
Alotta ***ina <alotta@***ina.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> You wrote:
>[color=green]
> > It may even have been a GWB intitiative.[/color]
>
> And I'm sure GWB spells it "intitiative", too.[/color]

To be critical of a persons typo error means you are groping for things
to be critical about. It appears you don't like my political position
and that is on the side of GWB, you are one of those who hate him,
correct?
--

"dbu`" <repubs@waitfor08.com> wrote in message
news:repubs-F7DB9C.18363213122006@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>>
>> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>>
>> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>>
>> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]
>
> This type of diplomacy has been tried in the past with varying sucess.
> Worth a try, but I'm not optimistic. History shows they have not been
> very cooperative. It may even have been a GWB intitiative.
> --
>[/color]

The only way to negotiate with these Islamic idiots is:

"Peace through superior firepower."

They're not going to negotiate until they think we're going to drop a W83 on
them. I'm beginning to wonder if we're going to have to make Bagdhad a
glass factory to get it to quiet down. Apparently even "daisy cutters"
don't faze these Jihadasses.

Charles of Schaumburg.

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>
> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>
> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>
> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy!
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]

Between your senator, the two up here in Illinois, the two in
Californication, and the two in New Jerk, I think the Senate is a waste of
our time and money.

Charles of Schaumburg

"Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
news:NbKdncsPUOreBx3YnZ2dnUVZ_vamnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>>
>> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>>
>> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>>
>> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]
>
> If you have no conversations w/the enemy, you are not liable to get
> anywhere, except in deeper dire straits. The hate (& possible
> misunderstandings) will build & build & build...
>
> As someone (Jimmy Carter?) recently pointed out (re: dialogue w/the
> enemy), did we halt all dialogue w/ the Soviet Union during the Cold war?
> No. Did we blow each other to smithereens? No.
>
> Cathy[/color]

WHY OH WHY are you LIEbrawls so bloody NAIVE, NAIVE, NAIVE. Most of the
terrorists/insurgents are nutbars. You CANNOT have meaningful dialogue with
nutbars. Look at the fucking idiot Neville Chamberlain and his totally naive
belief that one could negotiate with Hitler. Yeah, right. Same thing with
the barbarians in the middle east. The Soviet Union's leaders, for the most
part, were FAR from being nutbars. They understood and listened to REASON.


[color=blue]
>[color=green]
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]

In article <rTbgh.65835$YV4.255@edtnps89>,
"sharx35" <sharx35@hotmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> news:NbKdncsPUOreBx3YnZ2dnUVZ_vamnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=green]
> >
> > "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> > news:ku51o2hicjlsnnekvhd86miemvckvl07gi@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
> >> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
> >>
> >> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
> >>
> >> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
> >>
> >> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy![/color]
> >
> > If you have no conversations w/the enemy, you are not liable to get
> > anywhere, except in deeper dire straits. The hate (& possible
> > misunderstandings) will build & build & build...
> >
> > As someone (Jimmy Carter?) recently pointed out (re: dialogue w/the
> > enemy), did we halt all dialogue w/ the Soviet Union during the Cold war?
> > No. Did we blow each other to smithereens? No.
> >
> > Cathy[/color]
>
> WHY OH WHY are you LIEbrawls so bloody NAIVE, NAIVE, NAIVE. Most of the
> terrorists/insurgents are nutbars. You CANNOT have meaningful dialogue with
> nutbars. Look at the fucking idiot Neville Chamberlain and his totally naive
> belief that one could negotiate with Hitler. Yeah, right. Same thing with
> the barbarians in the middle east. The Soviet Union's leaders, for the most
> part, were FAR from being nutbars. They understood and listened to REASON.[/color]


Terrorists have no embassy, they only talk with guns and bombs.
Americans have a child like naiveness. The radical islamic extremists
know this and and are emboldened by it.
--

You wrote:
[color=blue]
> In article <Xns9898DA320E325Alotta***ina@66.250.146.128>,
> Alotta ***ina <alotta@***ina.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> You wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > but the radical islamic terrorists ultimately
>> > killed Anwar Sadat who seemed to be in favor of peace with Israel.[/color]
>>
>> As opposed to the radical Jewish terrorist who killed Yitzhak Rabin, who
>> seemed to be in favor of peace with Palestinians.
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Do we still need more education on radical islamic terrorists?[/color]
>>
>> Apparently you need more education about a lot of things.[/color]
>
> You are a radical islamic I take it?[/color]

If that'll make your tiny little brain stop hurting, then you can believe
whatever you want about me.

Although I'm not exactly sure what an "islamic" is.

Nelson is a complete jacka$$ and needs to be tried for aiding and
abetting the enemy. Of course, so do many other members of Congress.



Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,236321,00.html[/url]
>
> I wish this scum bag had pulled this crap before the election!
>
> I had a FIERY conversation with one of his staff in Washington today.
>
> There is NO question of where I stand on negotiation with the enemy!
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]

In article <Xns98995E859D860Alotta***ina@66.250.146.128>,
Alotta ***ina <alotta@***ina.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> You wrote:
>[color=green]
> > In article <Xns9898DA320E325Alotta***ina@66.250.146.128>,
> > Alotta ***ina <alotta@***ina.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> You wrote:
> >>
> >> > but the radical islamic terrorists ultimately
> >> > killed Anwar Sadat who seemed to be in favor of peace with Israel.
> >>
> >> As opposed to the radical Jewish terrorist who killed Yitzhak Rabin, who
> >> seemed to be in favor of peace with Palestinians.
> >>
> >> > Do we still need more education on radical islamic terrorists?
> >>
> >> Apparently you need more education about a lot of things.[/color]
> >
> > You are a radical islamic I take it?[/color]
>
> If that'll make your tiny little brain stop hurting, then you can believe
> whatever you want about me.
>
> Although I'm not exactly sure what an "islamic" is.[/color]

sure you do joe.
--