Who remembers this (HTML)

I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been associated with Toyotas!

I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.

However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!

You have been warned!



h9q

Hahciroku, 12/29/2006, 10:28:29 AM, <xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09> wrote:
[color=blue]
> From: "Hahciroku"[/color]

Who's this imposter?

Hahciroku wrote:[color=blue]
> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
> associated with Toyotas!
>
> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This
> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>
> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>
> You have been warned!
>
>
>
> h9q
>[/color]

We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what
you're seeing.

Dante

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hahciroku wrote:[color=green]
>> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
>> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
>> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
>> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
>> associated with Toyotas!
>>
>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This
>> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>
>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>
>> You have been warned!
>>
>>
>>
>> h9q
>>
>>[/color]
> We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what you're
> seeing.
>
> Dante[/color]


Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.

My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 15:44:46 +0000, badgolferman wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hahciroku, 12/29/2006, 10:28:29 AM, <xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> From: "Hahciroku"[/color]
>
> Who's this imposter?[/color]


Going back to our last discussion...I Fat Fingered the keyboard...

I have corrected it, but doubt I'll be using OE very often...

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
news:8_alh.2$Am5.1@trndny03...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>[color=green]
> > Hahciroku wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
> >> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
> >> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
> >> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
> >> associated with Toyotas!
> >>
> >> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.[/color][/color][/color]
This[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
> >>
> >> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
> >>
> >> You have been warned!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> h9q
> >>
> >>[/color]
> > We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what[/color][/color]
you're[color=blue][color=green]
> > seeing.
> >
> > Dante[/color]
>
>
> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>
> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>[/color]

I use OE and I saw it.

Al

Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:[color=blue]
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Hahciroku wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
>>> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
>>> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
>>> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
>>> associated with Toyotas!
>>>
>>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This
>>> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>>
>>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>>
>>> You have been warned!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> h9q
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what you're
>> seeing.
>>
>> Dante[/color]
>
>
> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>
> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>[/color]

I'm using Thunderbird. I was looking at the source and it appears that
it attempted to embed it but was unsuccessful.

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:22:26 -0700, Dante wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:[color=green]
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Hahciroku wrote:
>>>> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
>>>> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
>>>> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
>>>> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
>>>> associated with Toyotas!
>>>>
>>>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.
>>>> This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>>>
>>>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>>>
>>>> You have been warned!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> h9q
>>>>
>>>>
>>> We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what
>>> you're seeing.
>>>
>>> Dante[/color]
>>
>>
>> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>>
>> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>>
>>[/color]
> I'm using Thunderbird. I was looking at the source and it appears that it
> attempted to embed it but was unsuccessful.[/color]

Hmmm...well at least OE TRIES to do it...most newsreaders aren't even that
'sophisticated'...

It was supposed to be the old Toyota Logo that looked like t3q...

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:16:59 -0700, Big Al wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
> news:8_alh.2$Am5.1@trndny03...[color=green]
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > Hahciroku wrote:
>> >> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and
>> >> ran across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to
>> >> anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The original was a more
>> >> 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've
>> >> been associated with Toyotas!
>> >>
>> >> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.[/color][/color]
> This[color=green][color=darkred]
>> >> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>> >>
>> >> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>> >>
>> >> You have been warned!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> h9q
>> >>
>> >>
>> > We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what[/color][/color]
> you're[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > seeing.
>> >
>> > Dante[/color]
>>
>>
>> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>>
>> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>>
>>[/color]
> I use OE and I saw it.
>
> Al[/color]


You saw the "t3q"?

"Hahciroku" <Hachiroku@ae86.gts> wrote in message news:xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09...
I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been associated with Toyotas!

I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.

However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!

```````````````````````````

I see it, but have no clue as to its connotations.

Cathy

`````````````````````````

You have been warned!



h9q

Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:[color=blue]
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:22:26 -0700, Dante wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hahciroku wrote:
>>>>> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and ran
>>>>> across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to anyone? Not
>>>>> an exact replication, but close. The original was a more 'stylized'
>>>>> logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long you've been
>>>>> associated with Toyotas!
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.
>>>>> This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>>>>
>>>>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>>>>
>>>>> You have been warned!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> h9q
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what
>>>> you're seeing.
>>>>
>>>> Dante
>>>
>>> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>>>
>>> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> I'm using Thunderbird. I was looking at the source and it appears that it
>> attempted to embed it but was unsuccessful.[/color]
>
> Hmmm...well at least OE TRIES to do it...most newsreaders aren't even that
> 'sophisticated'...
>
> It was supposed to be the old Toyota Logo that looked like t3q...
>
>[/color]

If your font is fixed width you should be able to see this...:

__
__/ /_ __ _____ __
/_ __/ / / / ___/ / /
/ /___/ / / /__/ / /
/_______/ /____/ / /
______________/ /
/_____________ /
/_/

If not go to
[url]http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/500/medium/toyotalogo.jpg[/url]

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:36:53 -0500, Cathy F. wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Hahciroku" <Hachiroku@ae86.gts> wrote in message
> news:xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09... I was playing with some fonts I found on
> the web (about 1000!) and ran across this one. Does the bold text below
> look familiar to anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The
> original was a more 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it
> shows how long you've been associated with Toyotas!
>
> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects. This
> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>
> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>
> ```````````````````````````
>
> I see it, but have no clue as to its connotations.
>
> Cathy
>
> `````````````````````````[/color]

N00b! ;)
If you saw the 't3q', it is the old Toyota logo from before 1992. It was
usually on the key, in the manuals and on various parts around the car.


[color=blue]
>
> You have been warned!
>
>
>
> h9q
>
>
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
> <HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2995" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
> style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px;
> BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV>"Hahciroku" &lt;<A
> href="mailto:Hachiroku@ae86.gts">Hachiroku@ae86.gts</A>&gt; wrote in
> message <A
> href="news:xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09">news:xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09</A>...</DIV>
> <DIV>
> <P><FONT face=Angostura><FONT face=Arial>I was playing with some fonts I
> found on the web (about 1000!) and ran across this one. Does the bold
> text below look familiar to anyone? Not an exact replication, but close.
> The original was a more 'stylized' logo.&nbsp; And if you DO remember
> it, it shows how long you've been associated with
> Toyotas!</FONT></FONT></P> <P><FONT face=Angostura><FONT
> face=Arial>I&nbsp; don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the
> usual suspects. This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
> </FONT></FONT></P>
> <P><FONT face=Arial>However, if you can see this, let me know! If you
> can't let me know!</FONT></P>
> <P>```````````````````````````</P>
> <P><FONT size=2>I see it, but have no clue as to its
> connotations.</FONT></P> <P><FONT size=2>Cathy</FONT></P>
> <P><FONT size=2>`````````````````````````</FONT></P> <P><FONT
> face=Arial>You have been warned!</FONT></P> <P><FONT
> face=CommercialBreak size=5></FONT>&nbsp;</P> <P><FONT
> face=CommercialBreak size=5>h9q</FONT></P> <P><FONT
> size=5></FONT>&nbsp;</P>
> <P><FONT size=5></FONT>&nbsp;</P></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>[/color]

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:49:02 -0700, Dante wrote:
[color=blue]
> Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:[color=green]
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:22:26 -0700, Dante wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Hachiroku ãƒ?ãƒ?ãƒ*ク wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 08:53:04 -0700, Dante wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hahciroku wrote:
>>>>>> I was playing with some fonts I found on the web (about 1000!) and
>>>>>> ran across this one. Does the bold text below look familiar to
>>>>>> anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The original was a more
>>>>>> 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it shows how long
>>>>>> you've been associated with Toyotas!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.
>>>>>> This is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have been warned!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> h9q
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> We do not have the font you are talking about so we can't see what
>>>>> you're seeing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dante
>>>>
>>>> Oh, dear...it was supposed to be embedded.
>>>>
>>>> My theories about OE are correct...it sucks...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm using Thunderbird. I was looking at the source and it appears that
>>> it attempted to embed it but was unsuccessful.[/color]
>>
>> Hmmm...well at least OE TRIES to do it...most newsreaders aren't even
>> that 'sophisticated'...
>>
>> It was supposed to be the old Toyota Logo that looked like t3q...
>>
>>
>>[/color]
> If your font is fixed width you should be able to see this...:
>
> __
> __/ /_ __ _____ __
> /_ __/ / / / ___/ / /
> / /___/ / / /__/ / /
> /_______/ /____/ / /
> ______________/ /
> /_____________ /
> /_/
>
> If not go to
> [url]http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/500/medium/toyotalogo.jpg[/url][/color]


That I got! Nice.

On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:49:02 -0700, Dante wrote:

[color=blue][color=green]
>>[/color]
> If your font is fixed width you should be able to see this...:
>
> __
> __/ /_ __ _____ __
> /_ __/ / / / ___/ / /
> / /___/ / / /__/ / /
> /_______/ /____/ / /
> ______________/ /
> /_____________ /
> /_/
>
> If not go to
> [url]http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/500/medium/toyotalogo.jpg[/url][/color]


Thanks! I've been looking for one of those! I had a smaller version, but
this is great!

"Hachiroku ????" <Trueno@AE86.gts> wrote in message
news:mMblh.12$925.9@trndny04...[color=blue]
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:36:53 -0500, Cathy F. wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>> "Hahciroku" <Hachiroku@ae86.gts> wrote in message
>> news:xualh.6$c94.3@trndny09... I was playing with some fonts I found on
>> the web (about 1000!) and ran across this one. Does the bold text below
>> look familiar to anyone? Not an exact replication, but close. The
>> original was a more 'stylized' logo. And if you DO remember it, it
>> shows how long you've been associated with Toyotas!
>>
>> I don't wanna hear any griping about HTML from the usual suspects.
>> This
>> is an 'experiment' with Outhouse Express.
>>
>> However, if you can see this, let me know! If you can't let me know!
>>
>> ```````````````````````````
>>
>> I see it, but have no clue as to its connotations.
>>
>> Cathy
>>
>> `````````````````````````[/color]
>
> N00b! ;)[/color]

??
[color=blue]
> If you saw the 't3q', it is the old Toyota logo from before 1992. It was
> usually on the key, in the manuals and on various parts around the car.[/color]

I saw "h9q". I've had Toyotas since '84, but have to admit that I don't
remember the "t3q", either.

Cathy

[color=blue][color=green]
>>
>> You have been warned!
>>
>>
>>
>> h9q[/color][/color]