OT: 110th Congress

Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
won't sign.

And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
pack and all over the press.

--
Charles of Schaumburg.

"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:pa6dnQQbv4GraAHYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are
> taking over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills
> that GW won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.
>
> --
> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]

Bills that Dubya won't sign? Like legislation to permanently get K Street
Lobbyists out of Congress' pocket (or the other way aruond)? Or legislation
to get the 9/11 Recommendations fully implemented? I must admit when I
heard part of Pelosi's 100 Hours push was to get the 9/11 Recommendations
moving, I was utterly shocked. Shocked because this should have been done
years ago. What were the 109th and 108th and 107th doing besides sucking up
K-Street cash under the leadership of the GOP?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

"dh" <dh@stargate.com> wrote in message
news:459cf10c$0$4855$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...[color=blue]
> "n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:pa6dnQQbv4GraAHYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=green]
>> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are
>> taking over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of
>> bills that GW won't sign.
>>
>> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
>> pack and all over the press.
>>
>> --
>> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]
>
> Bills that Dubya won't sign? Like legislation to permanently get K Street
> Lobbyists out of Congress' pocket (or the other way aruond)? Or
> legislation to get the 9/11 Recommendations fully implemented? I must
> admit when I heard part of Pelosi's 100 Hours push was to get the 9/11
> Recommendations moving, I was utterly shocked. Shocked because this
> should have been done years ago. What were the 109th and 108th and 107th
> doing besides sucking up K-Street cash under the leadership of the GOP?
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]
>[/color]

Damn, you are a dumb hillbilly, aren't you? 9/11 Recommendations are just
that. W does not have to implement them. He took an oath to preserve,
protect and defend the US, not to kowtow to the DemonRats.

The reason the DemoCraps are pushing to get a lot of stuff done in the first
100 hours is so that we'll forget they did a lot of it by 2008 when the next
elections come. So they will keep chipping away at our freedom and doing
other Communist things like paying Social Security to illegal aliens. That
is your way. F*** the citizens, but do everything for the illegals. F***
the soldiers voting, but make sure the felons can vote.

Voters will remember the flash, but by 2008, most will have forgotten the
substance.

"Under the spreading chestnut tree,
I sold you and you sold me."

Charles of Schaumburg

"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:_smdnd3j6b88nADYnZ2dnUVZ_ompnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=blue]
> "dh" <dh@stargate.com> wrote in message
> news:459cf10c$0$4855$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...[color=green]
>> "n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:pa6dnQQbv4GraAHYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com...[color=darkred]
>>> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are
>>> taking over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of
>>> bills that GW won't sign.
>>> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of
>>> the pack and all over the press.
>>> --
>>> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]
>>
>> Bills that Dubya won't sign? Like legislation to permanently get K
>> Street Lobbyists out of Congress' pocket (or the other way aruond)? Or
>> legislation to get the 9/11 Recommendations fully implemented? I must
>> admit when I heard part of Pelosi's 100 Hours push was to get the 9/11
>> Recommendations moving, I was utterly shocked. Shocked because this
>> should have been done years ago. What were the 109th and 108th and 107th
>> doing besides sucking up K-Street cash under the leadership of the GOP?
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url][/color]
>
> Damn, you are a dumb hillbilly, aren't you? 9/11 Recommendations are just
> that. W does not have to implement them. He took an oath to preserve,
> protect and defend the US, not to kowtow to the DemonRats.
>
> The reason the DemoCraps are pushing to get a lot of stuff done in the
> first 100 hours is so that we'll forget they did a lot of it by 2008 when
> the next elections come. So they will keep chipping away at our freedom
> and doing other Communist things like paying Social Security to illegal
> aliens. That is your way. F*** the citizens, but do everything for the
> illegals. F*** the soldiers voting, but make sure the felons can vote.
>
> Voters will remember the flash, but by 2008, most will have forgotten the
> substance.
>
> "Under the spreading chestnut tree,
> I sold you and you sold me."
>
> Charles of Schaumburg[/color]

There's a quite a few pejoratives you could call me but I assure you,
"hillbilly" isn't one of them.

We have the world's longest undefended borders. That's quite a good thing;
we are at peace with our neighbors and don't need a military presence.
However, on Dubya's watch, these have also remained the world's longest
unsecured borders. That's not a good thing. He's done nothing to annoy his
corporate masters (i.e., interrupt their stream of cheap, illegal labor) and
he hasn't fully secured the nation.

If there's a nation more bribeable than Mexico, I pity it. Mexico, however,
is a special problem because it's our bribeable neighbor. What's to keep
Al-Qaeda from coming in the back door and paying off enough Mexican
officials to drag whatever they want to bring right up to the line? Every
time I fly, I have to practically get undressed and eat samples or my own
shaving cream to be allowed on the plane. All Al-Qaeda has to do to hit us
is walk in that back door. The disconnect between the hoops you go through
to get on a plane (a plane which is now going to be defended to the last man
on board because every pilot, flight attendant and passenger knows the
stakes) and how any terrorists could walk in across the border is just
ridiculous.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from [url]http://www.teranews.com[/url]

In article <pa6dnQQbv4GraAHYnZ2dnUVZ_qWvnZ2d@comcast.com>,
"n5hsr" <n5hsr@comcast.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.[/color]

I'm willing to wait and see, maybe they'll be good boys and girls and
not fight.
--

You wrote:
[color=blue]
> Like legislation to permanently get K Street
> Lobbyists out of Congress' pocket (or the other way aruond)?[/color]

William Jefferson's $90,000 says "hello".
[color=blue]
> Or
> legislation to get the 9/11 Recommendations fully implemented?[/color]

Already abandoned by D leadership. Haven't you been watching?
[color=blue]
> I must
> admit when I heard part of Pelosi's 100 Hours push was to get the 9/11
> Recommendations moving, I was utterly shocked.[/color]

Yeah, 'cause it hasn't happened.
[color=blue]
> Shocked because this should have been done years ago.[/color]

Fortunately our march to becoming a police state was stanched, however
briefly.

n5hsr wrote:[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.[/color]

No, you stupid lonely moron, Nancy Pelosi... that is MADAME SPEAKER
NANCY PELOSI (DEMOCRATIC), is at the head of the pack. I know you hate
women but try and have some fucking respect.

In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh
. . . .

n5hsr wrote:[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.
>
> --
> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]

In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh
. . . .

n5hsr wrote:[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.
>
> --
> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]

In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh
. . . .

n5hsr wrote:[color=blue]
> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> won't sign.
>
> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> pack and all over the press.
>
> --
> Charles of Schaumburg.[/color]

In article <1167951901.146815.277410@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
[email]sebemis@battlefoundry.net[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
> in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
> alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh[/color]

This has really been a problem. I've been fightiing this trend for
years and have not accomplished anything. Do you have any ideas?


[color=blue]
> . . . .
>
> n5hsr wrote:[color=green]
> > Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are taking
> > over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that GW
> > won't sign.
> >
> > And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
> > pack and all over the press.
> >
> > --
> > Charles of Schaumburg.[/color][/color]
--

dbu, wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1167951901.146815.277410@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>,
> [email]sebemis@battlefoundry.net[/email] wrote:
>[color=green]
> > In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
> > in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
> > alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh[/color][/color]

You must cherrypick the posts that are OT.
[color=blue]
>
> This has really been a problem. I've been fightiing this trend for
> years and have not accomplished anything. Do you have any ideas?[/color]

OH BROTHER. dbu, you're one of the top offenders. Why did you even
post this message???

[email]sebemis@battlefoundry.net[/email] wrote:[color=blue]
> In the recent past, less than ten years ago, people would post messages
> in newsgroups were related to the newsgroups topic. This is
> alt.autos.toyota, a discussion group for Toyota trucks and autos. Sigh
> . . . .[/color]

why in the HELL did you post this same whiney-ass off topic message
THREE TIMES IN A ROW? If you've been at this as long as you attempt to
indicate (see above), then you aren't a newbie, you're a moron.

"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1167938362.463415.249540@6g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
>
> n5hsr wrote:[color=green]
>> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are
>> taking
>> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that
>> GW
>> won't sign.
>>
>> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of the
>> pack and all over the press.[/color]
>
> No, you stupid lonely moron, Nancy Pelosi... that is MADAME SPEAKER
> NANCY PELOSI (DEMOCRATIC), is at the head of the pack. I know you hate
> women but try and have some fucking respect.
>[/color]

*I* give respect where respect is EARNED, ******.

"sharx35" <sharx35@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WQlnh.112081$rv4.41778@edtnps90...[color=blue]
>
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1167938362.463415.249540@6g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
>>
>> n5hsr wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Sound the alarm. Head for the air-raid shelters. The Dimocrats are
>>> taking
>>> over Congress today, and promising to pass a whole carload of bills that
>>> GW
>>> won't sign.
>>>
>>> And of course French Tickler Emmanuel, (D-Clinton), is at the head of
>>> the
>>> pack and all over the press.[/color]
>>
>> No, you stupid lonely moron, Nancy Pelosi... that is MADAME SPEAKER
>> NANCY PELOSI (DEMOCRATIC), is at the head of the pack. I know you hate
>> women but try and have some fucking respect.
>>[/color]
>
> *I* give respect where respect is EARNED, ******.
>
>
>
>[/color]

And if you look at Little Richard's response to me, you see why I've blocked
his address out of news messages.

It's funny how the press here has had Rahm Emmanuel (D-Clinton) all over the
place as being responsible for the DemonRat takeover of Congress. Yesterday
before the 110th Congress was sworn in, the media here had not Nancy
Pussilosi (D-******) but 'French Tickler' Emmanuel (D-Clinton) all over the
place.

Don't bother replying to me, Little Dick. I can't see your response. I cut
you and about 10 others off about 2 months ago.

Charles of Schaumburg