{OT} 9th circuit court idiocy

A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
the turn of the millennium.

Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
on the eve of the millennium.

The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.

Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
rationale behind the original 22-year term.

[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url]

That is the WORST reporting I've seen in a very long time. There is no
indication whatsoever as to the grounds the 9th used to reverse the
conviction.





"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0f1a4ehx1rvi000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
> was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
> the turn of the millennium.
>
> Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
> 1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
> trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
> on the eve of the millennium.
>
> The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
> cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
>
> Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
> all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
> San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
> the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
> rationale behind the original 22-year term.
>
> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url][/color]

"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:5G9rh.8635$Wz.8507@trndny06...[color=blue]
>
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0f1a4ehx1rvi000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
>>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
>> was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
>> the turn of the millennium.
>>
>> Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
>> 1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
>> trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
>> on the eve of the millennium.
>>
>> The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
>> cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
>>
>> Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
>> all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
>> San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
>> the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
>> rationale behind the original 22-year term.
>>
>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url][/color]
>[/color]

[color=blue]
> That is the WORST reporting I've seen in a very long time. There is no
> indication whatsoever as to the grounds the 9th used to reverse the
> conviction.[/color]



Check out the 9th thing in the list on this page. I haven't read it yet, but
it may help.

[url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?OpenView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1[/url]

Of course, I'm not sure if the source can be trusted. After all, the
information's not coming from an AM radio station, interspersed with
commercials for Garlique and vacuum cleaners. Hopefully, golf boy will still
manage.

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:14:19 -0500, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
>was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
>the turn of the millennium.
>
>Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
>1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
>trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
>on the eve of the millennium.
>
>The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
>cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
>
>Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
>all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
>San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
>the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
>rationale behind the original 22-year term.
>
>[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url][/color]

You CANNOT trust liberals with the national
defense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What a joke...


--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
news:abbqq2dlnd4g6l2lo20h4v7ub60k7v9273@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:14:19 -0500, "badgolferman"
> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
>>was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
>>the turn of the millennium.
>>
>>Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
>>1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
>>trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
>>on the eve of the millennium.
>>
>>The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
>>cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
>>
>>Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
>>all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
>>San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
>>the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
>>rationale behind the original 22-year term.
>>
>>[url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url][/color]
>
> You CANNOT trust liberals with the national
> defense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> What a joke...
> Scott in Florida
>[/color]


Other than what was in the badly written news article, what have you read
about the case?

"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Y3arh.694$B25.409@news01.roc.ny...[color=blue]
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:5G9rh.8635$Wz.8507@trndny06...[color=green]
>>
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0f1a4ehx1rvi000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>>>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
>>> was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
>>> the turn of the millennium.
>>>
>>> Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
>>> 1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
>>> trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
>>> on the eve of the millennium.
>>>
>>> The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
>>> cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
>>>
>>> Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
>>> all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
>>> San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
>>> the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
>>> rationale behind the original 22-year term.
>>>
>>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url][/color]
>>[/color]
>
>[color=green]
>> That is the WORST reporting I've seen in a very long time. There is no
>> indication whatsoever as to the grounds the 9th used to reverse the
>> conviction.[/color]
>
>
>
> Check out the 9th thing in the list on this page. I haven't read it yet,
> but it may help.
>
> [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?OpenView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1[/url]
>[/color]


I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER error.




[color=blue]
> Of course, I'm not sure if the source can be trusted. After all, the
> information's not coming from an AM radio station, interspersed with
> commercials for Garlique and vacuum cleaners. Hopefully, golf boy will
> still manage.
>[/color]

In article <pAarh.6819$q32.3143@trndny01>,
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:Y3arh.694$B25.409@news01.roc.ny...[color=green]
> > "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote in message
> > news:5G9rh.8635$Wz.8507@trndny06...[color=darkred]
> >>
> >> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:xn0f1a4ehx1rvi000@news.readfreenews.net...
> >>>A federal appeals court on Tuesday threw out the sentence of a man who
> >>> was convicted of plotting to bomb Los Angeles International Airport at
> >>> the turn of the millennium.
> >>>
> >>> Ahmed Ressam was arrested near the U.S.-Canadian border in December
> >>> 1999 as he drove off a ferry and customs agents found explosives in the
> >>> trunk of his car. Prosecutors said he was intent on bombing the airport
> >>> on the eve of the millennium.
> >>>
> >>> The arrest raised fears of terrorism attacks and prompted the
> >>> cancellation of millennium celebrations at Seattle's Space Needle.
> >>>
> >>> Ressam was sentenced to 22 years in prison after being convicted off
> >>> all nine charges. On Tuesday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
> >>> San Francisco reversed his conviction on one of the charges and sent
> >>> the case back to a lower court to issue a new sentence and explain the
> >>> rationale behind the original 22-year term.
> >>>
> >>> [url]http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070116/ap_on_re_us/millennium_terror_2[/url]
> >>[/color]
> >
> >[color=darkred]
> >> That is the WORST reporting I've seen in a very long time. There is no
> >> indication whatsoever as to the grounds the 9th used to reverse the
> >> conviction.[/color]
> >
> >
> >
> > Check out the 9th thing in the list on this page. I haven't read it yet,
> > but it may help.
> >
> > [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?OpenView&St[/url]
> > art=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1
> >[/color]
>
>
> I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER error.[/color]


Try this: [url]http://tinyurl.com/uaer3[/url]



[color=blue]
>
>
>
>
>[color=green]
> > Of course, I'm not sure if the source can be trusted. After all, the
> > information's not coming from an AM radio station, interspersed with
> > commercials for Garlique and vacuum cleaners. Hopefully, golf boy will
> > still manage.
> >[/color][/color]
--

JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:31:14 PM, wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?O[/url]
> > > penView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1
> > >[/color]
> >
> >
> > I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER error.[/color]
>
>
> Yeah - seems to be temporarily dead. Keep trying.[/color]

I guess your sources of information aren't very reliable either.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0f1a6mu104wvg000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:31:14 PM, wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > > [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?O[/url]
>> > > penView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER error.[/color]
>>
>>
>> Yeah - seems to be temporarily dead. Keep trying.[/color]
>
> I guess your sources of information aren't very reliable either.[/color]


For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort to not say
something stupid?

JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:41:46 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:xn0f1a6mu104wvg000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:31:14 PM, wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>> >[/color][/color]
> [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?O[/url][color=green][color=darkred]
> >>> > penView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1 >>> >
> > > >
> > > >
> >>> I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER[/color][/color]
> error.[color=green][color=darkred]
> > >
> > >
> > > Yeah - seems to be temporarily dead. Keep trying.[/color]
> >
> > I guess your sources of information aren't very reliable either.[/color]
>
>
> For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort to
> not say something stupid?[/color]

You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0f1a6ry10c9n7001@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:41:46 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:xn0f1a6mu104wvg000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>> > JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,3:31:14 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >>> >[/color]
>> [url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?O[/url][color=darkred]
>> >>> > penView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1 >>> >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> >>> I'm having trouble with that link, I get a CANNOT FIND SERVER[/color]
>> error.[color=darkred]
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Yeah - seems to be temporarily dead. Keep trying.
>> >
>> > I guess your sources of information aren't very reliable either.[/color]
>>
>>
>> For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort to
>> not say something stupid?[/color]
>
> You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.[/color]


Here's your source, moron:
[url]http://www.google.com/search?q=9th+circuit+court+of+appeals&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official[/url]

Dispute that.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort to
> > > not say something stupid?[/color]
> >
> > You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.[/color]
>
>
> Here's your source, moron:
> [url]http://www.google.com/search?q=9th+circuit+court+of+appeals&start=0&ie[/url]
> =utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
>
> Dispute that.[/color]

What is there to dispute, a page full of web links? Why did they
overturn the conviction, Johnny Cochran?

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:45ad3e6a$0$97242$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>> > > For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort to
>> > > not say something stupid?
>> >
>> > You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.[/color]
>>
>>
>> Here's your source, moron:
>> [url]http://www.google.com/search?q=9th+circuit+court+of+appeals&start=0&ie[/url]
>> =utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
>>
>> Dispute that.[/color]
>
> What is there to dispute, a page full of web links? Why did they
> overturn the conviction, Johnny Cochran?[/color]


You disputed the source because the web site was not working. When the web
site works, you can read the pdf file yourself. I provided the link and said
earlier that I hadn't read it. I'm busy.

JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,4:09:00 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:45ad3e6a$0$97242$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...[color=green]
> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>> > For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort[/color][/color]
> to >>> > not say something stupid?[color=green][color=darkred]
> > > >
> >>> You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's your source, moron:
> > > [url]http://www.google.com/search?q=9th+circuit+court+of+appeals&start=[/url]
> > > 0&ie
> > > =utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
> > >
> > > Dispute that.[/color]
> >
> > What is there to dispute, a page full of web links? Why did they
> > overturn the conviction, Johnny Cochran?[/color]
>
>
> You disputed the source because the web site was not working. When
> the web site works, you can read the pdf file yourself. I provided
> the link and said earlier that I hadn't read it. I'm busy.[/color]

You provided a link to a story you didn't read? Speaking of being
foolish...

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0f1a80d11zd86000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> JoeSpareBedroom, 1/16/2007,4:09:00 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:45ad3e6a$0$97242$892e7fe2@authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...[color=darkred]
>> > JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
>> >
>> >>> > For just 5 minutes each day, could you make a monumental effort[/color]
>> to >>> > not say something stupid?[color=darkred]
>> > > >
>> >>> You're right. Responding to you is a stupid thing to do.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Here's your source, moron:
>> > > [url]http://www.google.com/search?q=9th+circuit+court+of+appeals&start=[/url]
>> > > 0&ie
>> > > =utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official
>> > >
>> > > Dispute that.
>> >
>> > What is there to dispute, a page full of web links? Why did they
>> > overturn the conviction, Johnny Cochran?[/color]
>>
>>
>> You disputed the source because the web site was not working. When
>> the web site works, you can read the pdf file yourself. I provided
>> the link and said earlier that I hadn't read it. I'm busy.[/color]
>
> You provided a link to a story you didn't read? Speaking of being
> foolish...[/color]


No, stupid. Strickland said "That is the WORST reporting I've seen in a very
long time. There is no indication whatsoever as to the grounds the 9th used
to reverse the
conviction." Since he's a real person who'll probably read more about the
case, I gave him the link, and clearly stated that I had NOT read it.

Keep in mind that for the last few messages, you have NOT been arguing about
the case itself. Instead, you've been wasting your time bitching about a web
site that's temporarily having problems. How stupid is that?

Now, go to the site, which is working again, and do your homework. Then, you
can come back and pretend to be a legal expert, like dbu.
[url]http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/Opinions+by+date?OpenView&Start=1&Count=100&Expand=1.1[/url]