OT: The bag lady

[url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url]
--

dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
<nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]

If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?

On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:18:42 -0600, dbu <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>[url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]

Isn't that the woman that had her husband pardon terrorists?


--

Scott in Florida

'Let every nation know, whether it
wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden,
meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe to assure the survival
and the success of liberty.'

John F. Kennedy

On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
<REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]
>
>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?[/color]

Newt Gingrich?


--

Scott in Florida

'Let every nation know, whether it
wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden,
meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe to assure the survival
and the success of liberty.'

John F. Kennedy

In article <3o1ir2d9cplksblhfgo8qmgops2sm8lo8o@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:18:42 -0600, dbu <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >[url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]
>
> Isn't that the woman that had her husband pardon terrorists?[/color]

And she pardoned him, LOL

[color=blue]
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>
> 'Let every nation know, whether it
> wishes us well or ill, that we shall
> pay any price, bear any burden,
> meet any hardship, support any friend,
> oppose any foe to assure the survival
> and the success of liberty.'
>
> John F. Kennedy[/color]
--

In article <bq1ir2divv9phemqsrg14q8r2n2sotuvfh@4ax.com>,
Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> ><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]
> >
> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?[/color]
>
> Newt Gingrich?[/color]

I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
[color=blue]
>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>
> 'Let every nation know, whether it
> wishes us well or ill, that we shall
> pay any price, bear any burden,
> meet any hardship, support any friend,
> oppose any foe to assure the survival
> and the success of liberty.'
>
> John F. Kennedy[/color]
--

dbu wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]

You voted for George W. because you thought he was cute.

dbu wrote:
[color=blue]
> I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.[/color]

Normal people would have to be dosed with GHB to vote for that complete
shithead.

"dbu" <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message
news:nspam-4D5031.14224625012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <bq1ir2divv9phemqsrg14q8r2n2sotuvfh@4ax.com>,
> Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> ><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url]
>> >
>> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?[/color]
>>
>> Newt Gingrich?[/color]
>
> I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
>[/color]


I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?

I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the way
things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a bit
harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a clear
speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.

Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics problem
lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is problematic
enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems haven't
an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.

In article <1169757740.201211.199310@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"MaceFace" <maceface@nycmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> dbu wrote:[color=green]
> > [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url][/color]
>
> You voted for George W. because you thought he was cute.[/color]

No I didn't vote for him because you thought he was cute. Sheezzz.
--

In article <OI8uh.7225$U81.242@trnddc06>,
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "dbu" <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message
> news:nspam-4D5031.14224625012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=green]
> > In article <bq1ir2divv9phemqsrg14q8r2n2sotuvfh@4ax.com>,
> > Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> >> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> >> ><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url]
> >> >
> >> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
> >>
> >> Newt Gingrich?[/color]
> >
> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
> >[/color]
>
>
> I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
> run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?
>
> I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the way
> things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a bit
> harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a clear
> speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
> without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
> dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.
>
> Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics problem
> lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
> detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is problematic
> enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems haven't
> an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.[/color]

I think both of those guys are political street knife fighters, perhaps
on the same level with hillary.
--

In article <1169757901.041985.81960@q2g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"MaceFace" <maceface@nycmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> dbu wrote:
>[color=green]
> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.[/color]
>
> Normal people would have to be dosed with GHB to vote for that complete
> shithead.[/color]

"shithead", that's what makes him so attractive to vote for. We need
shitheads to deal with the terrorists and dimmies.
--

"dbu" <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message

[color=blue]
> "shithead", that's what makes him so attractive to vote for. We need
> shitheads to deal with the terrorists and dimmies.
> --[/color]
Too late.....we've already got several of them, and they're lame ducks,
gratefully.

I can't believe you really said that (above).

Did you vote for GWB knowing that he was a shithead?

"dbu" <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message
news:nspam-EF33E7.15391625012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <OI8uh.7225$U81.242@trnddc06>,
> "Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "dbu" <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message
>> news:nspam-4D5031.14224625012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>> > In article <bq1ir2divv9phemqsrg14q8r2n2sotuvfh@4ax.com>,
>> > Scott in Florida <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> >> <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> >> ><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url]
>> >> >
>> >> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
>> >>
>> >> Newt Gingrich?
>> >
>> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
>> >[/color]
>>
>>
>> I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
>> run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?
>>
>> I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the
>> way
>> things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a
>> bit
>> harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a
>> clear
>> speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
>> without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
>> dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.
>>
>> Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics
>> problem
>> lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
>> detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is
>> problematic
>> enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems
>> haven't
>> an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.[/color]
>
> I think both of those guys are political street knife fighters, perhaps
> on the same level with hillary.
> --
>[/color]

Maybe. But Newt has more experience than Hill, and makes a far better
argument about what the target of the knife should be.

In article <SH9uh.1277$B25.28@news01.roc.ny>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborealis@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Scott in Florida" <askifyouwant@mindspring.net> wrote in message
> news:bq1ir2divv9phemqsrg14q8r2n2sotuvfh@4ax.com...[color=green]
> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> > <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> >><nspam-8F9972.12184225012007@comcast.dca.giganews.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> [url]http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html[/url]
> >>
> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?[/color]
> >
> > Newt Gingrich?[/color]
>
> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?[/color]

Morally unqualified?
--