Re: OT: Americans want to win in Iraq

In article <12tnrdrdjjj5811@corp.supernews.com>,
"mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
> news:TMCdnaRHz-IgQEbYnZ2dnUVZ_o6gnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=green]
> >
> > "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> > news:1172032866.278893.319980@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> >>
> >> dbu, wrote:
> >>
> >>> The survey was conducted nationwide February 5-7 among a bi-partisan,
> >>> cross-section of 800 registered voters. It has a margin of error of plus
> >>> or minus 3.5 percent. The survey was commissioned by The Moriah Group, a
> >>> Chattanooga-based strategic communications and public affairs firm.
> >>
> >> "Strategic communications" = propaganda[/color]
> >
> > I read it *way* too quickly; missed things - both literal & inferential -
> > left & right!
> >
> > Cathy
> >
> >[color=darkred]
> >>
> >> Remember the Lincoln Group and its propaganda program in Iraq, where
> >> it bribed Iraqis to write positively of progress in the war?
> >>
> >> "Lincoln Group is a strategic communications firm that
> >> provides our clients with access to cultures which have
> >> historically been difficult to reach through traditional
> >> Western
> >> communications."[/color][/color]
>
> Polls can be so skewed, simply by the way the questions are asked. I doubt
> whether, if you
> asked the question "Do you want the US to win in Iraq?" you'd have more than
> a few "No" answers.
> I'd like for the US to win the war in Iraq too. I'd also like to have a
> hot date with Eva Longoria
> or Charlize Theron, but just as the war in Iraq will not be won, it ain't
> gonna happen.[/color]

It's funny, you guys refer to them a lot when they favor your side.
--

"dbu," <nspam@nojoke.com> wrote in message
news:nspam-26BDD9.04372821022007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...[color=blue]
> In article <12tnrdrdjjj5811@corp.supernews.com>,
> "mack" <mackerel@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "Cathy F." <clfr@adelphiadot.net> wrote in message
>> news:TMCdnaRHz-IgQEbYnZ2dnUVZ_o6gnZ2d@giganews.com...[color=darkred]
>> >
>> > "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1172032866.278893.319980@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >>
>> >> dbu, wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> The survey was conducted nationwide February 5-7 among a bi-partisan,
>> >>> cross-section of 800 registered voters. It has a margin of error of
>> >>> plus
>> >>> or minus 3.5 percent. The survey was commissioned by The Moriah
>> >>> Group, a
>> >>> Chattanooga-based strategic communications and public affairs firm.
>> >>
>> >> "Strategic communications" = propaganda
>> >
>> > I read it *way* too quickly; missed things - both literal &
>> > inferential -
>> > left & right!
>> >
>> > Cathy
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Remember the Lincoln Group and its propaganda program in Iraq, where
>> >> it bribed Iraqis to write positively of progress in the war?
>> >>
>> >> "Lincoln Group is a strategic communications firm that
>> >> provides our clients with access to cultures which have
>> >> historically been difficult to reach through traditional
>> >> Western
>> >> communications."[/color]
>>
>> Polls can be so skewed, simply by the way the questions are asked. I
>> doubt
>> whether, if you
>> asked the question "Do you want the US to win in Iraq?" you'd have more
>> than
>> a few "No" answers.
>> I'd like for the US to win the war in Iraq too. I'd also like to have
>> a
>> hot date with Eva Longoria
>> or Charlize Theron, but just as the war in Iraq will not be won, it ain't
>> gonna happen.[/color]
>
> It's funny, you guys refer to them a lot when they favor your side.[/color]

But Repuglicants never do, right?