Re: OT: ³inaccuracies² in ³An Inconvenient Truth.²

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:58:29 -0500, "dbu,." <question-mark@einp.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
><[url]http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?ex=1331438400&en=2df[/url]
>9d6e7a5aa6ed6&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss>
>
>Tiny: [url]http://tinyurl.com/2judz6[/url]
>
>
>Hollywood has a thing for Al Gore and his three-alarm film on global
>warming, ³An Inconvenient Truth,² which won an Academy Award for best
>documentary. So do many environmentalists, who praise him as a
>visionary, and many scientists, who laud him for raising public
>awareness of climate change.
>But part of his scientific audience is uneasy. In talks, articles and
>blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book
>came out last year, these scientists argue that some of Mr. Gores
>central points are exaggerated and erroneous. They are alarmed, some
>say, at what they call his alarmism.
>I dont want to pick on Al Gore, Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus
>professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of
>experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. But
>there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we
>have to temper that with real data.[/color]

Ahhhhhhhhhh how sweet it is....

The New York Times taking down Al Gore.....

--

Scott in Florida