OT: DeLay's Whole Family Are Crooks

"The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have
been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action
and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure
statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as "fund-raising
fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional details
about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]

"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1112799433.129890.197470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> "The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have
> been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action
> and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure
> statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
> fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
> payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
> DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as "fund-raising
> fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional details
> about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]
>[/color]

If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets. Fox's
O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt POS
that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to impeach
Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:35:02 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1112799433.129890.197470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
>> "The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have
>> been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action
>> and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure
>> statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
>> fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
>> payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
>> DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as "fund-raising
>> fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional details
>> about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]
>>[/color]
>
>If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
>of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets. Fox's
>O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
>Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt POS
>that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
>morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to impeach
>Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.[/color]

OR we could talk about Diane Fein-swine's husband and the millions his
company has been awarded to help rebuild Iraq.

Funny how that one escaped the notice of the "mainstream" media.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

Eric Dreher wrote:[color=blue]
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:35:02 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> >"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:1112799433.129890.197470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
> >> "The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader,[/color][/color][/color]
have[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political[/color][/color][/color]
action[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of[/color][/color][/color]
disclosure[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
> >> fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
> >> payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
> >> DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as[/color][/color][/color]
"fund-raising[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional[/color][/color][/color]
details[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]
> >>[/color]
> >
> >If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
> >of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets. Fox's
> >O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
> >Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt[/color][/color]
POS[color=blue][color=green]
> >that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
> >morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to[/color][/color]
impeach[color=blue][color=green]
> >Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.[/color]
>
> OR we could talk about Diane Fein-swine's husband and the millions[/color]
his[color=blue]
> company has been awarded to help rebuild Iraq.
>
> Funny how that one escaped the notice of the "mainstream" media.[/color]

OK thats cool, lets talk about that too. I'm not married to any
politician because of their party affiliation my man. If Feinstein has
skeletons in the closet, scare 'em out baby.

I'm so damn tired of hearing neocons whining about the media. Its just
a deflection from the real issues.

While you guys are bellyaching about Clinton, blow jobs and Starbucks,
hundreds of very young American men and women have been slaughtered in
Iraq to satiate the White House sense of Hubris and Revenge.


Richard
-------
[url]www.xdnc.com[/url]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:35:02 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1112799433.129890.197470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
>> "The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have
>> been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action
>> and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure
>> statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
>> fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
>> payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
>> DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as "fund-raising
>> fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional details
>> about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]
>>[/color]
>
>If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
>of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets.[/color]


He wouldn't need to fabricate in this case. DeLay's a crook.

[color=blue]
> Fox's
>O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
>Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt POS
>that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
>morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to impeach
>Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.
>
>[/color]

--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! [url]http://signup.databasix.com[/url]
===========================================================================

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:auh8515vgcka21bqi68ef2fiakm0rk2bv0@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:35:02 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>>"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1112799433.129890.197470@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=darkred]
>>> "The wife and daughter of Tom DeLay, the House majority leader, have
>>> been paid more than $500,000 since 2001 by Mr. DeLay's political action
>>> and campaign committees, according to a detailed review of disclosure
>>> statements filed with the Federal Election Commission and separate
>>> fund-raising records in Mr. DeLay's home state, Texas. Most of the
>>> payments to his wife, Christine A. DeLay, and his only child, Dani
>>> DeLay Ferro, were described in the disclosure forms as "fund-raising
>>> fees," "campaign management" or "payroll," with no additional details
>>> about how they earned the money." [New York Times, 4/6/05]
>>>[/color]
>>
>>If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
>>of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets. Fox's
>>O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
>>Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt POS
>>that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
>>morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to impeach
>>Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.[/color]
>
> OR we could talk about Diane Fein-swine's husband and the millions his
> company has been awarded to help rebuild Iraq.
>
> Funny how that one escaped the notice of the "mainstream" media.
>[/color]
Fill us in. Any politican that is corrupt should be exposed. I won't defend
anybody based on party affiliation like you do. If you think the "main
stream"
media would bury a juicy story because they're a democrat, just
shows how brain washed the right wing talk shows have you.

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:13:07 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> OR we could talk about Diane Fein-swine's husband and the millions his
>> company has been awarded to help rebuild Iraq.
>>
>> Funny how that one escaped the notice of the "mainstream" media.
>>[/color]
>Fill us in. Any politican that is corrupt should be exposed. I won't defend
>anybody based on party affiliation like you do. If you think the "main
>stream" media would bury a juicy story because they're a democrat, just
>shows how brain washed the right wing talk shows have you.[/color]

Really? Then why haven't you heard about it from the lips of Rather
or his ilk?

[url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL[/url]

This disappeared from public view or their attention almost as fast as
it appeared. At that time, Cheney's PAST involvement with Halliburton
was far more worthy of the media's attention.

Notice the percentage of his control.

Me brainwashed? Physician, heal thyself.



------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message >[color=blue]
> Really? Then why haven't you heard about it from the lips of Rather
> or his ilk?
>[/color]

I don't know, why haven't I heard it from the lips of Brit Hume?
I'm sure if Fienstien was running for president this would
have been played to the hilt by Karl Rove.

[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL[/url]
>
> This disappeared from public view or their attention almost as fast as
> it appeared. At that time, Cheney's PAST involvement with Halliburton
> was far more worthy of the media's attention.
>
> Notice the percentage of his control.
>
> Me brainwashed? Physician, heal thyself.
>[/color]
Of course you defended Chenny and Haliburton, but now Fienstiens a crook?
Of course neither did anything illegal, unethical maybe but not illegal.

[color=blue]
>[/color]
[color=blue]
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:35:02 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>If DeLay was a Democrat, Karl Rove would have a massive campaign
>of fabricated news stories to be fed to all the media outlets. Fox's
>O' Reilly and Hannity would have this as there main rant as would
>Limbaugh. Yet the republicans are totally silent about this corrupt POS
>that is the their Majority Leader. Of course these are the same
>morons would spent years and millions of tax payer money trying to impeach
>Clinton, and in the end could not find one instance of wrong doing.[/color]

Well, these right-wingers are nothing if not hypocrites. To them,
hypocrisy and lies are just business as usual, if it allows them to
"win".

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:55:42 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message >[color=green]
>> Really? Then why haven't you heard about it from the lips of Rather
>> or his ilk?
>>[/color]
>
>I don't know, why haven't I heard it from the lips of Brit Hume?
>I'm sure if Fienstien was running for president this would
>have been played to the hilt by Karl Rove.[/color]

Why wouldn't it be? Consider the liars and the forged docs that
led to Rather's downfall.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> [url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL[/url]
>>
>> This disappeared from public view or their attention almost as fast as
>> it appeared. At that time, Cheney's PAST involvement with Halliburton
>> was far more worthy of the media's attention.
>>
>> Notice the percentage of his control.
>>
>> Me brainwashed? Physician, heal thyself.
>>[/color]
>Of course you defended Chenny and Haliburton, but now Fienstiens a crook?
>Of course neither did anything illegal, unethical maybe but not illegal.[/color]

Where did I defend Cheney? I merely said that Feinstein's fiasco was
playing out at the same time, and was ignored. Sure it was unethical,
possibly illegal, and certainly worthy of at least the same attention.

And you ought to read up on Halliburton and who was involved in the
White House when they set up their contracts.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

Eric Dreher wrote:[color=blue]
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:13:07 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >> OR we could talk about Diane Fein-swine's husband and the millions[/color][/color][/color]
his[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> company has been awarded to help rebuild Iraq.
> >>
> >> Funny how that one escaped the notice of the "mainstream" media.
> >>[/color]
> >Fill us in. Any politican that is corrupt should be exposed. I won't[/color][/color]
defend[color=blue][color=green]
> >anybody based on party affiliation like you do. If you think the[/color][/color]
"main[color=blue][color=green]
> >stream" media would bury a juicy story because they're a democrat,[/color][/color]
just[color=blue][color=green]
> >shows how brain washed the right wing talk shows have you.[/color]
>
> Really? Then why haven't you heard about it from the lips of Rather
> or his ilk?
>[/color]

Yo Eric.

Dan Rather isn't trying to phuck with the United States Constitution.
Bill Clinton wasn't responsible for Vietnam Deux when he lied.

Until we agree on this, we're going to continue to degenerate into
baseless and subjective rants, peppered with sophomoric insults.

[color=blue]
>[/color]
[url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL[/url][color=blue]
>
> This disappeared from public view or their attention almost as fast[/color]
as[color=blue]
> it appeared. At that time, Cheney's PAST involvement with[/color]
Halliburton[color=blue]
> was far more worthy of the media's attention.
>[/color]

Compared to DeLay this is trivial.

[color=blue]
> Notice the percentage of his control.
>
> Me brainwashed? Physician, heal thyself.[/color]

You're just convicted. To the wrong side.
[color=blue]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to brooklyn.[/color]

Richard
-------
[url]www.xdnc.com[/url]

On 6 Apr 2005 18:49:37 -0700, "Learning Richard"
<learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:

[color=blue]
>[/color]
[color=blue]
>
>Dan Rather isn't trying to phuck with the United States Constitution.
>Bill Clinton wasn't responsible for Vietnam Deux when he lied.[/color]

Dan Rather tried to throw an election by reading a false story.

What would you call that?

Bill Clinton was responsible for 9/11 by not having the balls to go
after a fellow named Osama. He was too interested in polls and b/j's

[color=blue]
>
>Until we agree on this, we're going to continue to degenerate into
>baseless and subjective rants, peppered with sophomoric insults.
>[/color]

--
Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On 6 Apr 2005 18:49:37 -0700, "Learning Richard"
> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> >[/color]
>[color=green]
> >
> >Dan Rather isn't trying to phuck with the United States[/color][/color]
Constitution.[color=blue][color=green]
> >Bill Clinton wasn't responsible for Vietnam Deux when he lied.[/color]
>
> Dan Rather tried to throw an election by reading a false story.
>
> What would you call that?
>[/color]

Scott, that was magnificent. A magnificent assumption of Dan Rather's
power over you and me.

It did gather much "mainstream media" attention. Rather screwed up big
time, yep he sure did buddy.

Oh yeah, he didn't work for John Kerry either.

[crash@alt.autos.toyota]$ grep -i bullshit scott
[color=blue]
> 9/11
> Osama[/color]

I was referring to IRAQ when I mentioned Vietnam Deux. Not the
Taliban. We defeated the Taliban handily, and now we get good heroin
thanks to Wolfowitz and Silent Rumsfeld. Never mind that we still
haven't nabbed the thug Osama.
[color=blue]
> b/j's[/color]

case in point -- the neocon blowjob fixation. get one sometime.
[color=blue]
>
>[color=green]
> >
> >Until we agree on this, we're going to continue to degenerate into
> >baseless and subjective rants, peppered with sophomoric insults.
> >[/color]
>
> --
> Scott in Florida[/color]

Richard
-------
[url]www.xdnc.com[/url]

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:9uu851lhf6e38924p4q6qa22cahel8ftv9@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:55:42 -0700, "ToMh" <Teelhumm@hotm.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message >[color=darkred]
>>> Really? Then why haven't you heard about it from the lips of Rather
>>> or his ilk?
>>>[/color]
>>
>>I don't know, why haven't I heard it from the lips of Brit Hume?
>>I'm sure if Fienstien was running for president this would
>>have been played to the hilt by Karl Rove.[/color]
>
> Why wouldn't it be? Consider the liars and the forged docs that
> led to Rather's downfall.[/color]

Which dominated the "mainstream media for weeks"
Again, why didn't Fox pick this up?[color=blue]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> [url]http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL[/url]
>>>
>>> This disappeared from public view or their attention almost as fast as
>>> it appeared. At that time, Cheney's PAST involvement with Halliburton
>>> was far more worthy of the media's attention.
>>>
>>> Notice the percentage of his control.
>>>
>>> Me brainwashed? Physician, heal thyself.
>>>[/color]
>>Of course you defended Chenny and Haliburton, but now Fienstiens a crook?
>>Of course neither did anything illegal, unethical maybe but not illegal.[/color]
>
> Where did I defend Cheney? I merely said that Feinstein's fiasco was
> playing out at the same time, and was ignored. Sure it was unethical,
> possibly illegal, and certainly worthy of at least the same attention.
>[/color]
Show me were the mainstream media gave all this attention to
Chenney and Halliburton? The fact that it was election time would
automatically make it more news worthy, but the media paid very
little attention to it. You were told it did, but it never happened.
You're confused because people on the internet brought it up or
the DNC made an issue of it, but that's not the same as the media.
[color=blue]
> And you ought to read up on Halliburton and who was involved in the
> White House when they set up their contracts.
>[/color]
Why? and I have. Personally I think that the mainstream media
does have a left bias, but its not nearly as bad as the right thinks, but
it certainly does exist. The thing is, a good story and ratings trump
any bias anytime, and I have never seen a news worthy story ignored, at
least not by all the mainstream media.
[color=blue]
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 22:24:20 -0700, "ToMh" <teelhumm@html.com> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>I don't know, why haven't I heard it from the lips of Brit Hume?
>>>I'm sure if Fienstien was running for president this would
>>>have been played to the hilt by Karl Rove.[/color]
>>
>> Why wouldn't it be? Consider the liars and the forged docs that
>> led to Rather's downfall.[/color]
>
>Which dominated the "mainstream media for weeks"
>Again, why didn't Fox pick this up?[/color]

They did, and were the only ones that gave it any air time at all.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Where did I defend Cheney? I merely said that Feinstein's fiasco was
>> playing out at the same time, and was ignored. Sure it was unethical,
>> possibly illegal, and certainly worthy of at least the same attention.
>>[/color]
>Show me were the mainstream media gave all this attention to
>Chenney and Halliburton? The fact that it was election time would
>automatically make it more news worthy, but the media paid very
>little attention to it. You were told it did, but it never happened.
>You're confused because people on the internet brought it up or
>the DNC made an issue of it, but that's not the same as the media.[/color]

You can't be serious in this response. Cheney and Halliburton became
their whipping boys. The media, Dan Rather in particular, couldn't
get enough of it.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> And you ought to read up on Halliburton and who was involved in the
>> White House when they set up their contracts.
>>[/color]
>Why? and I have. Personally I think that the mainstream media
>does have a left bias, but its not nearly as bad as the right thinks, but
>it certainly does exist. The thing is, a good story and ratings trump
>any bias anytime, and I have never seen a news worthy story ignored, at
>least not by all the mainstream media.[/color]

Let's assume you have. Who then was in bed with Halliburton when
their contracts were set up, before Cheney entered the political
flap over this whole thing?


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.