OT: Fox News Broadcast Historic George W. Bush "Press Conference" on Two-Second Delay

Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom

MSNBC was two seconds ahead.


Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?



Richard
-------
[url]www.xdnc.com[/url]

Was the slow system from a digital video recorder like the one's supplied by
dish? They are always a couple of seconds behind.


"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1114743063.166796.17600@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>
> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>
>
> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>
>
>
> Richard
> -------
> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url]
>[/color]

Art wrote:[color=blue]
> Was the slow system from a digital video recorder like the one's[/color]
supplied by[color=blue]
> dish? They are always a couple of seconds behind.
>
>
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1114743063.166796.17600@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
> > Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
> >
> > MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
> >
> >
> > Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard
> > -------
> > [url]www.xdnc.com[/url][/color][/color]
[color=blue]
>
> Was the slow system from a digital video recorder like the one's[/color]
supplied by[color=blue]
> dish? They are always a couple of seconds behind.
>[/color]

Nope -- both from the same cable line.

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>
> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>
> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?[/color]

Even sheep couldn't stay awake through that droning.

Ed

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
[color=blue]
> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>
> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>
>
> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>
>
>
> Richard
> -------
> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url][/color]

Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:47:47 GMT, Another Tom
<thamilt_anda_5@snet.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>>
>> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>>
>>
>> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard
>> -------
>> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url][/color]
>
>Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.[/color]

LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
of satellite relays and cable systems.

BTW, Fox IS trying to garner CNN viewers. Looks like the extra delay
is working while pandering to LLL's.

Even in pre-sat, pre-cable days, one could see the difference between
your local affiliates when broadcasting the same pool camera info
during nationally broadcasted events.

HTH.

------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

Eric Dreher wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:47:47 GMT, Another Tom
> <thamilt_anda_5@snet.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
> >>
> >> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
> >>
> >>
> >> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Richard
> >> -------
> >> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url][/color]
> >
> >Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.[/color]
>
> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>[/color]

One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
digital boxes. Whats to understand?

On 29 Apr 2005 18:47:17 -0700, "Learning Richard"
<learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>Eric Dreher wrote:[color=green]
>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:47:47 GMT, Another Tom
>> <thamilt_anda_5@snet.net> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
>> >
>> >> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>> >>
>> >> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Richard
>> >> -------
>> >> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url]
>> >
>> >Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.[/color]
>>
>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>>[/color]
>
>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]

The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....


--
Scott in Florida

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
<NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
>>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
>>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]
>
>The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....[/color]

Bingo. But don't confuse the poor little LLL with the facts, Scott.

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
<NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
[color=blue]
>On 29 Apr 2005 18:47:17 -0700, "Learning Richard"
><learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>>Eric Dreher wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:47:47 GMT, Another Tom
>>> <thamilt_anda_5@snet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>>> >>
>>> >> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Richard
>>> >> -------
>>> >> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url]
>>> >
>>> >Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.
>>>
>>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
>>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
>>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]
>
>The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....
>[/color]

It ain't two seconds, Scott. They were, indeed, delaying it. I think
they do it so that their reporters have time to be told what was said.
:)


--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! [url]http://signup.databasix.com[/url]
===========================================================================

On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
<NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
>>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
>>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]
>
>The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....[/color]

Give that man a ceegar.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:36:07 -0700, [email]user@user.net[/email] forged a valid
domain name and wrote:
[color=blue]
>On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
><NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
>>>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>>>>
>>>
>>>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
>>>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]
>>
>>The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....[/color]
>
>Bingo.[/color]

That's what republicans will be playing in a couple of years, to make
up for the SS money they won't get.
--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! [url]http://signup.databasix.com[/url]
===========================================================================

Eric Dreher wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
> <NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
> >>> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little[/color][/color][/color]
understanding[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >>> of satellite relays and cable systems.
> >>>
> >>
> >>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
> >>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color]
> >
> >The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....[/color]
>
> Give that man a ceegar.
>[/color]

Let me make it simpler. All of the other broadcasts were in sync with
msnbc except for fox. Can you wrap your heads around that?

Gary L. Burnore wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 02:20:49 GMT, Scott in Florida
> <NotInTheNextLifetime@nope.ucan't> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
> >[/color][/color]
[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >>One cable coming in, being split on a y-adapter, and feeding two
> >>digital boxes. Whats to understand?[/color][/color][/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> >The route each takes to get to the digital boxes.....
> >[/color]
>[/color]
[color=blue]
> It ain't two seconds, Scott. They were, indeed, delaying it. I[/color]
think[color=blue]
> they do it so that their reporters have time to be told what was[/color]
said.[color=blue]
> :)
>[/color]

OK yeah Scott.... two seconds... that's right! I route the second
cable around the block and split it a few more times before it gets up
the hall. The quality of both lines is identical.

Typical -- Jesus man just accept that Fox is an instrument of the White
House

Eric Dreher wrote:[color=blue]
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:47:47 GMT, Another Tom
> <thamilt_anda_5@snet.net> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:51:03 -0700, Learning Richard wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>> Fox in Living Room -- MSNBC in Bedroom
>>>
>>> MSNBC was two seconds ahead.
>>>
>>>
>>> Was Fox doing some covert censorship for its sheep?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Richard
>>> -------
>>> [url]www.xdnc.com[/url][/color]
>>
>> Fox HAS to be slower, so the listeners can understand.[/color]
>
> LOL. Sounds like more than one person here has little understanding
> of satellite relays and cable systems.
>
> BTW, Fox IS trying to garner CNN viewers. Looks like the extra delay
> is working while pandering to LLL's.
>
> Even in pre-sat, pre-cable days, one could see the difference between
> your local affiliates when broadcasting the same pool camera info
> during nationally broadcasted events.
>
> HTH.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]

Did anyone notice, for instance, that there was a 2.5 second delay on the
Apollo 11 audio? The speed of light, and by inference radio waves, is not
infinite. It takes about 1.25 seconds to reach the moon from Earth and
another 1.25 seconds to make the return trip. MSNBC may be using the hard
wired NBC network (first set up in the 50's) whereas Fox is undoubtedly
using satelite link. There is a bit of time used in the space link. They
have to change the modulation. Satellite channels used to be FM, I think
the new band is digital. Broadcast TV is AM with FM sound. Has been since
about 1941 in the US.

Or maybe they are putting subliminal messages in. <G>

Charles of Kankakee