Re: OT Kerry the C Student!!!! ROFL

Josh -

If you could ever get past your juvenile name-calling, you would see
that what is so amusing about this story is the contrast between 1) the
evidence that JFK struggled in school and 2) the left's claims that his
intelligence far exceeds that of GWB. That claim is nonsense. You
don't get where they are by being stupid, but GWB and his proponents
have never claimed intellectual superiority. While GWB is *at times* a
weak public speaker, I think he is earnest and much more believable in
general.

JFK, like many others who subscribe to his political philosophy (Al
Gore is another), seems to be a graduate of the "If you can't dazzle
them with brilliance, baffle them with bull$hit" school of public
speaking. Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.

On 8 Jun 2005 07:18:35 -0700, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.[/color]

If he/they could, we'd see more Republicans. LLL's are far too easily
swayed by emotions.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:4t2ea1lju1vq***pbgh9q7suq4afq6icj6@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On 8 Jun 2005 07:18:35 -0700, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.[/color]
>
> If he/they could, we'd see more Republicans. LLL's are far too easily
> swayed by emotions.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]

As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.

--
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and
over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"Truckdude" <duhbyuh@cox.net> wrote in message
news:NgEpe.24769$U_2.9191@trnddc06...[color=blue]
>
> "Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
> news:4t2ea1lju1vq***pbgh9q7suq4afq6icj6@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On 8 Jun 2005 07:18:35 -0700, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.[/color]
>>
>> If he/they could, we'd see more Republicans. LLL's are far too easily
>> swayed by emotions.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]
>
> As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
> when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
>[/color]

The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will see
who demonstrates most emotion.

"Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote in message
news:11ae5dhf9gs5k2f@news.supernews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "Truckdude" <duhbyuh@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:NgEpe.24769$U_2.9191@trnddc06...[color=green]
>>
>> "Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
>> news:4t2ea1lju1vq***pbgh9q7suq4afq6icj6@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
>>> On 8 Jun 2005 07:18:35 -0700, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.
>>>
>>> If he/they could, we'd see more Republicans. LLL's are far too easily
>>> swayed by emotions.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]
>>
>> As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
>> when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
>>[/color]
>
> The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will
> see who demonstrates most emotion.
>[/color]

Try a larger sample base, as in many threads over a long time.

--
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and
over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote in message
news:1118240315.516242.186710@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Josh -
>
> If you could ever get past your juvenile name-calling, you would see[/color]

You can call it juvenile name-calling all you want, a dumbshit is a dumbshit
is a dumbshit. Here's another 'juvenile' word for you: Hypocrite, learn the
word. From now on since you neos seem so intent on calling any liberal
leaning poster in this NG who spouts a nasty word a 'juvenile' or whatever
else your little brains can come up with, first try doing the same for the
Right. I'll of course be keeping track of your posts and I expect you to
call out the Righties like yourself on these comments as well. Get over
yourself.
[color=blue]
> that what is so amusing about this story is the contrast between 1) the
> evidence that JFK struggled in school and 2) the left's claims that his
> intelligence far exceeds that of GWB. That claim is nonsense. You
> don't get where they are by being stupid, but GWB and his proponents
> have never claimed intellectual superiority. While GWB is *at times* a
> weak public speaker, I think he is earnest and much more believable in
> general.[/color]

At times? Hardly....According to Bushs Ideology he reached a majority and
far surpassed it in his weak speaking percentile bracket.
[color=blue]
> JFK, like many others who subscribe to his political philosophy (Al
> Gore is another), seems to be a graduate of the "If you can't dazzle
> them with brilliance, baffle them with bull$hit" school of public
> speaking. Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.[/color]

I'm sure anything you don't agree with in your neo ways is Bullshit. Funny
how you have made it into a JFK philosophy. Now according to the neocons
being yourself and being intelligent is a philosophy? Oh and please point me
to where Kerry made Intelligence an issue as well.... you cant because he
didn't. The publics the one who decided who the smarter guy was.

You guys really are dumbshits, honestly.

"Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
news:aQednSIFNvz8hDrfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=blue]
>
> "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote in message
> news:1118240315.516242.186710@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=green]
>> Josh -
>>
>> If you could ever get past your juvenile name-calling, you would see[/color]
>
> You can call it juvenile name-calling all you want, a dumbshit is a
> dumbshit
> is a dumbshit. Here's another 'juvenile' word for you: Hypocrite, learn
> the
> word. From now on since you neos seem so intent on calling any liberal
> leaning poster in this NG who spouts a nasty word a 'juvenile' or whatever
> else your little brains can come up with, first try doing the same for the
> Right. I'll of course be keeping track of your posts and I expect you to
> call out the Righties like yourself on these comments as well. Get over
> yourself.
>[color=green]
>> that what is so amusing about this story is the contrast between 1) the
>> evidence that JFK struggled in school and 2) the left's claims that his
>> intelligence far exceeds that of GWB. That claim is nonsense. You
>> don't get where they are by being stupid, but GWB and his proponents
>> have never claimed intellectual superiority. While GWB is *at times* a
>> weak public speaker, I think he is earnest and much more believable in
>> general.[/color]
>
> At times? Hardly....According to Bushs Ideology he reached a majority and
> far surpassed it in his weak speaking percentile bracket.
>[color=green]
>> JFK, like many others who subscribe to his political philosophy (Al
>> Gore is another), seems to be a graduate of the "If you can't dazzle
>> them with brilliance, baffle them with bull$hit" school of public
>> speaking. Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.[/color]
>
> I'm sure anything you don't agree with in your neo ways is Bullshit. Funny
> how you have made it into a JFK philosophy. Now according to the neocons
> being yourself and being intelligent is a philosophy? Oh and please point
> me
> to where Kerry made Intelligence an issue as well.... you cant because he
> didn't. The publics the one who decided who the smarter guy was.
>
> You guys really are dumbshits, honestly.
>
>[/color]

Don't hold back, Josh. Let 'em know how it really is...lol

--
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and
over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote in message
news:11ae5dhf9gs5k2f@news.supernews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "Truckdude" <duhbyuh@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:NgEpe.24769$U_2.9191@trnddc06...[color=green]
> >
> > "Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
> > news:4t2ea1lju1vq***pbgh9q7suq4afq6icj6@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
> >> On 8 Jun 2005 07:18:35 -0700, "Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Try to develop the ability to discern between the two.
> >>
> >> If he/they could, we'd see more Republicans. LLL's are far too easily
> >> swayed by emotions.
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------
> >> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]
> >
> > As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
> > when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
> >[/color]
>
> The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will[/color]
see[color=blue]
> who demonstrates most emotion.[/color]

Who says anyones saying it with emotion? Are you so blind you cant see it
from your own party as well?

On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:58:39 -0500, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
[color=blue][color=green]
>> As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
>> when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
>>[/color]
>
>The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will see
>who demonstrates most emotion.[/color]

From what I've seen, LLL's exhibit more hysterics than a blonde
actress in a B grade horror flick.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

Josh -

I never said JFK himself made intelligence an issue, to do so would
have been political suicide. But criticizing GWB as "dumb" is a very
consistent theme of the so-called "intelligent" Lefties who have no
better ammunition or ideas than knee-jerk name calling (sound
familiar?).

You must be too young to recall Reagan's re-election campaign, but many
of us fondly recall how he handled the Left's lame claim that he was
"too old". It was a classic moment in political history. They never
seem to learn that it's much better to criticize someone's ideas than
their personal attributes. Of course to criticize someone's ideas you
need to have some better ones yourself, which the Left has lacked for
most of the last 40 years.

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:o07ea11b16ul20t8foer01irfd9b70nigf@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:58:39 -0500, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
>>> when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
>>>[/color]
>>
>>The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will
>>see
>>who demonstrates most emotion.[/color]
>
> From what I've seen, LLL's exhibit more hysterics than a blonde
> actress in a B grade horror flick.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]


Is that a right-wing bigoted statement against blondes? ;-)

--
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and
over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the
propaganda." -George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:33:26 GMT, "Truckdude" <duhbyuh@cox.net> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
>news:o07ea11b16ul20t8foer01irfd9b70nigf@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:58:39 -0500, "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>> As if RRR's are swayed by intellect?? Who demonstrates the most emotion
>>>> when posting in this NG? Yet another baseless statement.
>>>>
>>>
>>>The liberals are the ones name calling. Look at this thread and you will
>>>see
>>>who demonstrates most emotion.[/color]
>>
>> From what I've seen, LLL's exhibit more hysterics than a blonde
>> actress in a B grade horror flick.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.[/color]
>
>
>Is that a right-wing bigoted statement against blondes? ;-)[/color]

LOL....

I was gonna ask for the name of the movie....

--

Scott in Florida

On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:53:46 -0400, "Josh"
<nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>The left would not criticize his personal attributes if his ideas were not
>up for criticism as well, you understand that, right? The only thing the
>left has lacked for the last 40 years is pushing the social liberal issue
>the way it should be and to be ousting these anti-American one sided
>religious agenda righties from Congress.
>[/color]

ROFL.....

You are too young to remember the last 40 years...and the reason the
liberals are in the minority is that you guys HAVE been pushing your
liberal garbage....

btw...the majority of Americans are conservative....


--

Scott in Florida

"Mark" <markpippin@email.com> wrote in message
news:1118248324.485525.22500@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> Josh -
>
> I never said JFK himself made intelligence an issue, to do so would
> have been political suicide.[/color]

"but GWB and his proponents
have never claimed intellectual superiority."

Sounds to me like you are implying JFK and his proponents have.
[color=blue]
>But criticizing GWB as "dumb" is a very
> consistent theme of the so-called "intelligent" Lefties who have no
> better ammunition or ideas than knee-jerk name calling (sound
> familiar?).[/color]

A smart being can be dumb. Bush may just be a smart guy who is consistently
doing dumb things. Again you seem to be blind about your 'knee-jerk' name
calling, don't be such a hypocrite.
[color=blue]
> You must be too young to recall Reagan's re-election campaign, but many
> of us fondly recall how he handled the Left's lame claim that he was
> "too old". It was a classic moment in political history. They never
> seem to learn that it's much better to criticize someone's ideas than
> their personal attributes. Of course to criticize someone's ideas you
> need to have some better ones yourself, which the Left has lacked for
> most of the last 40 years.[/color]

The left would not criticize his personal attributes if his ideas were not
up for criticism as well, you understand that, right? The only thing the
left has lacked for the last 40 years is pushing the social liberal issue
the way it should be and to be ousting these anti-American one sided
religious agenda righties from Congress.

On Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:05:25 -0400, "Josh"
<nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>You keep saying I'm too young. How old am I Scott?[/color]

You are 12 going on 23...


--

Scott in Florida