OT: Jackson gets off.

Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we have
to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to listen
to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
line for Jesus Juice and pornography.

Good God.

"Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=blue]
> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
> have
> to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
> parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> listen
> to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
> line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>
> Good God.[/color]


Considering the source of the accusations, I am not surprised he was found
not guilty on all charges. That family is even creepier than MJ himself.

In article <11as7fbb8191195@news.supernews.com>,
"Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
> > Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
> > have
> > to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
> > parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> > listen
> > to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> > tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
> > line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
> >
> > Good God.[/color][/color]


The evidence was weak to start. It was a just verdict. Remember joshy
nobody is sent to jail including you unless you would be found guilty
beyond reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt.....get it? I don't know how
to make it any more simple for you, sorry.
--

"Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=blue]
> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
> have
> to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
> parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> listen
> to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
> line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>
> Good God.
>
>[/color]
Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he was
on trial? :-) Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ is.
Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible. Acquittal doesn't mean
freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he won't
get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
never had a popularity problem in other countries. I feel a bit of a loss
for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass on
that when that guy became a woman...

Natalie

"Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote in message
news:11as7fbb8191195@news.supernews.com...[color=blue]
>
> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
>> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
>> have
>> to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
>> parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
>> listen
>> to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
>> tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
>> line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>>
>> Good God.
>>
>>[/color]
>
> He got off because he is white... :")
>[/color]
ROFL!

Natalie, who shared that one with her kids, who laughed their arses off as
well

In article <42ae2a20$0$20681$626a14ce@news.free.fr>,
"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
> > Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
> > have
> > to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
> > parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> > listen
> > to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> > tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
> > line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
> >
> > Good God.
> >
> >[/color]
> Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he was
> on trial? :-) Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ is.
> Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible. Acquittal doesn't mean
> freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
> were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
> were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he won't
> get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
> never had a popularity problem in other countries. I feel a bit of a loss
> for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass on
> that when that guy became a woman...
>
> Natalie[/color]

Sorry but there was undeniable evidence against O.J. He got off because
of a VERY favorable jury. O.J. was a dead man walking until he got the
jury he got. Luck man that O.J.
--

I replied to your post above Nat!! Before I saw this thread.

Yep, he is weird but being weird doesn't make you guilty. Evidence
does that.

Ron

"Dbu~^" <ntspam@spc.om> wrote in message
news:ntspam-8545C3.20242813062005@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> In article <42ae2a20$0$20681$626a14ce@news.free.fr>,
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
>> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=darkred]
>> > Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
>> > have
>> > to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots
>> > for
>> > parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
>> > listen
>> > to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
>> > tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting
>> > in
>> > line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>> >
>> > Good God.
>> >
>> >[/color]
>> Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he
>> was
>> on trial? :-) Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ
>> is.
>> Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible. Acquittal doesn't
>> mean
>> freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
>> were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
>> were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he
>> won't
>> get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
>> never had a popularity problem in other countries. I feel a bit of a loss
>> for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass
>> on
>> that when that guy became a woman...
>>
>> Natalie[/color]
>
> Sorry but there was undeniable evidence against O.J. He got off because
> of a VERY favorable jury. O.J. was a dead man walking until he got the
> jury he got. Luck man that O.J.
> --
>[/color]
Hmmm I'm no legal expert, but the prosecution looked decidedly incompetent to
me

Natalie

"ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:eIqre.27888$J12.9446@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=blue]
>I replied to your post above Nat!! Before I saw this thread.
>
> Yep, he is weird but being weird doesn't make you guilty. Evidence does
> that.
>
> Ron[/color]
Yeah - I knew what you meant anyway :-)

Natalie

OJ or MJ -- same rules apply...

If the hand don't fit -- you must aquit

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:51:52 -0400, Wickeddoll® wrote:
[color=blue]
>
> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
>> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
>> have
>> to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
>> parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
>> listen
>> to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
>> tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
>> line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>>
>> Good God.
>>
>>[/color]
> Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he was
> on trial? :-) Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ is.
> Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible. Acquittal doesn't mean
> freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
> were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
> were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he won't
> get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
> never had a popularity problem in other countries. I feel a bit of a loss
> for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass on
> that when that guy became a woman...
>
> Natalie[/color]


We'll see. While he was crying 'poverty' he was offered a tour of Asia,
where he was immensly popular. Halfway through the finalizing, when venues
were booked, tickets on sale and eager fans waiting, he backed out.

Wonder if he's still popular in Japan...probably not with promoters...

If he needs cash he can always sell the catalogue of Lennon-McCartney
songs. Paul has about $60B...

"Hachiroku" <Trueno@ae86.gts> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.06.14.03.54.39.78000@ae86.gts...[color=blue]
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:51:52 -0400, Wickeddoll® wrote:
>[color=green]
>>
>> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
>> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=darkred]
>>> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
>>> have
>>> to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots for
>>> parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
>>> listen
>>> to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
>>> tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting in
>>> line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
>>>
>>> Good God.
>>>
>>>[/color]
>> Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he
>> was
>> on trial? :-) Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ
>> is.
>> Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible. Acquittal doesn't
>> mean
>> freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
>> were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
>> were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he
>> won't
>> get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
>> never had a popularity problem in other countries. I feel a bit of a loss
>> for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass
>> on
>> that when that guy became a woman...
>>
>> Natalie[/color]
>
>
> We'll see. While he was crying 'poverty' he was offered a tour of Asia,
> where he was immensly popular. Halfway through the finalizing, when venues
> were booked, tickets on sale and eager fans waiting, he backed out.
>
> Wonder if he's still popular in Japan...probably not with promoters...
>
> If he needs cash he can always sell the catalogue of Lennon-McCartney
> songs. Paul has about $60B...[/color]

He's already sold off some of that, and yes, he's still enormously popular in
not only Japan, but many places in Europe

Natalie

"Dbu~^" <ntspam@spc.om> wrote in message
news:ntspam-539A6D.19363613062005@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...[color=blue]
> In article <11as7fbb8191195@news.supernews.com>,
> "Dan J.S." <me@hyperx.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> > "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> > news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=darkred]
> > > Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do[/color][/color][/color]
we[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > have
> > > to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots[/color][/color][/color]
for[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> > > listen
> > > to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> > > tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting[/color][/color][/color]
in[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> > > line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
> > >
> > > Good God.[/color][/color]
>
>
> The evidence was weak to start. It was a just verdict. Remember joshy
> nobody is sent to jail including you unless you would be found guilty
> beyond reasonable doubt. Reasonable doubt.....get it? I don't know how
> to make it any more simple for you, sorry.
> --[/color]

No shit Sherlock! _reasonable doubt_ not /a/ doubt. The evidence was not all
that weak, it was applied in a weak way. They did a pretty shitty job and
the Jury failed to see through it all.

"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42ae2a20$0$20681$626a14ce@news.free.fr...[color=blue]
>
> "Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
> news:8rednWN7r5eYmDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=green]
> > Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do we
> > have
> > to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these irresponsible idiots[/color][/color]
for[color=blue][color=green]
> > parents send their little boys over to sleep with him we will have to
> > listen
> > to this every 10 years or so. I'm sure he's having a big celebration
> > tonight, and I'm sure all the little boys are flocking on over getting[/color][/color]
in[color=blue][color=green]
> > line for Jesus Juice and pornography.
> >
> > Good God.
> >
> >[/color]
> Bad choice of words in your topic title, Josh; wasn't that the reason he[/color]
was[color=blue]
> on trial? :-)[/color]

Don't think I thought of that when I typed it? =P
[color=blue]
>Seriously, though, he'll be very stigmatized, just as OJ is.
> Remember when OJ was everywhere? Now he's invisible.[/color]

Agreed. Even so, it's sickening to see OJ out on the golf course free to
play a game.
[color=blue]
>Acquittal doesn't mean
> freedom. Jackson's guilt was never much of an issue to me. Those parents
> were morons to let a grown man 'play with' their children overnight. WTF
> were they *thinking*?! Clearly Jacko needs intense mental help, but he[/color]
won't[color=blue]
> get it. His career is pretty much over in this country, I think; but he's
> never had a popularity problem in other countries.[/color]

Maybe he will denounce citizenship and move to Japan.
[color=blue]
>I feel a bit of a loss
> for a star that I once dreamed of growing up and marrying. I had to pass[/color]
on[color=blue]
> that when that guy became a woman...[/color]

Well not much more to say, he's a free manikin....errr man...err whatever.

Josh wrote:[color=blue]
> Personally I think this Jury screwed up, big time. How many times do
> we have to put up with this BS? I guess as long as these
> irresponsible idiots for parents send their little boys over to sleep
> with him we will have to listen to this every 10 years or so. I'm
> sure he's having a big celebration tonight, and I'm sure all the
> little boys are flocking on over getting in line for Jesus Juice and
> pornography.
>
> Good God.[/color]

Chill! As long as we get the important things right like the 'war' on drugs
and....