OFF TOPIC: Not to beat a dead horse, on Jacko

This guy's opinion mirrors mine exactly:

[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8077719/[/url]

Natalie

--





[url]http://www.dwarfstar.net[/url] - the best internet relay chat network ever!

"Wicked little doll, you are not human,
Wicked little doll, you have no soul."
(David Byrne, 1997)

On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:03:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>This guy's opinion mirrors mine exactly:
>
>[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8077719/[/url][/color]

One other thing. Keeping the backlash of the O.J. verdict in mind,
this one puts to rest the myth that stupid juries fall within any
racial makeup.


------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.

Not being on the jury, none of us can realize what the evidence was.

My personal opinion was that the evidence we read & saw was not near
enough to convict him of anything.

Being a weird bird doesn't make him guilty.

The big factor for me, Doll, was why did the boy & mother wait until
July to report a molestation that occurred in Feb or March AFTER
seeing 2 lawyers and a shrink.... Then the 13 year old tells the cops
don't tell my mother what happened? Who took him to the police?

Anyhow, too bad that someone who had so much talent will now probably
lose it all because of wacky habits.

Ron

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:midsa1tnt1c472u6gjkl4e5bk95dvso5oh@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:03:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
> <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>>This guy's opinion mirrors mine exactly:
>>
>>[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8077719/[/url][/color]
>
> One other thing. Keeping the backlash of the O.J. verdict in mind,
> this one puts to rest the myth that stupid juries fall within any
> racial makeup.[/color]

Actually, I'm not convinced OJ is the killer - but you can damned well
believe he knows who *is*

Natalie

"ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:eIqre.27887$J12.16960@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=blue]
> Not being on the jury, none of us can realize what the evidence was.
>
> My personal opinion was that the evidence we read & saw was not near enough
> to convict him of anything.
>
> Being a weird bird doesn't make him guilty.
>
> The big factor for me, Doll, was why did the boy & mother wait until July
> to report a molestation that occurred in Feb or March AFTER seeing 2
> lawyers and a shrink.... Then the 13 year old tells the cops don't tell my
> mother what happened? Who took him to the police?
>
> Anyhow, too bad that someone who had so much talent will now probably lose
> it all because of wacky habits.
>
> Ron[/color]
Yes, just as that guy in the article said. Money is a factor, so that made
this suspicious in the first place, but as I've said all over the net for
some time, his career is most probably gone, at least in the US - his
overseas popularity never wavered in the slightest, so he won't starve.

It's a shame he never got the help he needed (guilty or not)

Natalie

"Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
news:midsa1tnt1c472u6gjkl4e5bk95dvso5oh@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:03:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
> <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >This guy's opinion mirrors mine exactly:
> >
> >[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8077719/[/url][/color]
>
> One other thing. Keeping the backlash of the O.J. verdict in mind,
> this one puts to rest the myth that stupid juries fall within any
> racial makeup.[/color]

The OJ jury was not so stupid. Some of them knew he was guilty and one
admitted they let him go to get some Justice against the whites!

"Josh" <nobody@noplacenowhere.never> wrote in message
news:CMWdnW6plvHYxDPfUSdV9g@ptd.net...[color=blue]
>
> "Eric Dreher" <ericd@cox.nét> wrote in message
> news:midsa1tnt1c472u6gjkl4e5bk95dvso5oh@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:03:36 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
>> <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >This guy's opinion mirrors mine exactly:
>> >
>> >[url]http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8077719/[/url][/color]
>>
>> One other thing. Keeping the backlash of the O.J. verdict in mind,
>> this one puts to rest the myth that stupid juries fall within any
>> racial makeup.[/color]
>
> The OJ jury was not so stupid. Some of them knew he was guilty and one
> admitted they let him go to get some Justice against the whites![/color]

Justice against the whites??? That's not stupid???

What a great county in which we live.. Where else could a,
faulty accused, poor black boy grow up and get justice as a rich
white man? ;)


mike hunt

Innocent or not, he has got to get his head on straight.


"Wickeddoll®" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42ae46d9$0$31274$626a14ce@news.free.fr...[color=blue]
>
> "ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
> news:eIqre.27887$J12.16960@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=green]
>> Not being on the jury, none of us can realize what the evidence
>> was.
>>
>> My personal opinion was that the evidence we read & saw was not
>> near enough to convict him of anything.
>>
>> Being a weird bird doesn't make him guilty.
>>
>> The big factor for me, Doll, was why did the boy & mother wait
>> until July to report a molestation that occurred in Feb or March
>> AFTER seeing 2 lawyers and a shrink.... Then the 13 year old tells
>> the cops don't tell my mother what happened? Who took him to the
>> police?
>>
>> Anyhow, too bad that someone who had so much talent will now
>> probably lose it all because of wacky habits.
>>
>> Ron[/color]
> Yes, just as that guy in the article said. Money is a factor, so
> that made this suspicious in the first place, but as I've said all
> over the net for some time, his career is most probably gone, at
> least in the US - his overseas popularity never wavered in the
> slightest, so he won't starve.
>
> It's a shame he never got the help he needed (guilty or not)
>
> Natalie
>[/color]

"ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:arFre.28466$J12.21596@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=blue]
> Innocent or not, he has got to get his head on straight.
>[/color]
Isn't his whole head already gone?

Natalie[color=blue]
>
> "Wickeddoll®" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:42ae46d9$0$31274$626a14ce@news.free.fr...[color=green]
>>
>> "ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:eIqre.27887$J12.16960@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=darkred]
>>> Not being on the jury, none of us can realize what the evidence was.
>>>
>>> My personal opinion was that the evidence we read & saw was not near
>>> enough to convict him of anything.
>>>
>>> Being a weird bird doesn't make him guilty.
>>>
>>> The big factor for me, Doll, was why did the boy & mother wait until July
>>> to report a molestation that occurred in Feb or March AFTER seeing 2
>>> lawyers and a shrink.... Then the 13 year old tells the cops don't tell
>>> my mother what happened? Who took him to the police?
>>>
>>> Anyhow, too bad that someone who had so much talent will now probably
>>> lose it all because of wacky habits.
>>>
>>> Ron[/color]
>> Yes, just as that guy in the article said. Money is a factor, so that
>> made this suspicious in the first place, but as I've said all over the net
>> for some time, his career is most probably gone, at least in the US - his
>> overseas popularity never wavered in the slightest, so he won't starve.
>>
>> It's a shame he never got the help he needed (guilty or not)
>>
>> Natalie
>>[/color]
>[/color]

He might as well, he had everything ON it worked on already ;)


mike hunt



ron wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Innocent or not, he has got to get his head on straight.
>[/color]

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:50:29 -0400, "Wickeddoll®"
<wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>"ron" <randus3remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
>news:arFre.28466$J12.21596@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...[color=green]
>> Innocent or not, he has got to get his head on straight.
>>[/color]
>Isn't his whole head already gone?
>
>Natalie[/color]

Only if he stuck a shotgun in his mouth after the trial.... <EG>

-LMB

"dizzy" <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:9poua1hse54n6snc3k42p9q8naj1jebc8f@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 15:26:00 -0400, some stupid top-posting,
> nym-shifting troll, currently calling himself DustyRhoades wrote:
>[color=green]
>>He might as well, he had everything ON it worked on already ;)[/color]
>
> I believe MJ is a top poster.
>[/color]

Tar and feather him! That, at least, might keep his prosthetic nose attached

Natalie