OT: jeb bush

Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack on Teri
Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find any useful work.

Partial fix:
foreach bush in politics
rm *bush*
end foreach

"FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2qVse.309$Q75.66024@newshog.newsread.com...[color=blue]
> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack on[/color]
Teri[color=blue]
> Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find any useful[/color]
work.[color=blue]
>
> Partial fix:
> foreach bush in politics
> rm *bush*
> end foreach[/color]

Isn't it sick! He just can't help himself but to now have her husband
investigated...Why? Because he once said he called 911 at 5am instead of
4:30am which he said once before, even though all along he always claimed he
did not know the exact time. The great thing about the Republicans is they
do all the work for the Dems to make themselves look incompetent.

FanJet wrote:[color=blue]
> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack on Teri
> Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find any useful work.
>
> Partial fix:
> foreach bush in politics
> rm *bush*
> end foreach
>[/color]

while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
}

much more elegant -- perl

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> FanJet wrote:[color=green]
>> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
>> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack
>> on Teri Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find
>> any useful work.
>>
>> Partial fix:
>> foreach bush in politics
>> rm *bush*
>> end foreach
>>[/color]
>
> while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
> delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
> }
>
> much more elegant -- perl[/color]

Hopefully I didn't bump into something real. My intention was pseudo-code.
As far ad I'm concerned, the language jury is still out. I do like RPN from
the time when HP made real/really made caluculators - pre-China.

FanJet wrote:[color=blue]
> Learning Richard wrote:[color=green]
> > FanJet wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
> >> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack
> >> on Teri Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find
> >> any useful work.
> >>
> >> Partial fix:
> >> foreach bush in politics
> >> rm *bush*
> >> end foreach
> >>[/color]
> >
> > while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
> > delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
> > }
> >
> > much more elegant -- perl[/color]
>
> Hopefully I didn't bump into something real. My intention was pseudo-code.
> As far ad I'm concerned, the language jury is still out. I do like RPN from
> the time when HP made real/really made caluculators - pre-China.
>[/color]

Hey I thought this was just a team effort -- you roll out the
pseudocode, then I actually write the delete_bush.pl program!

On 18 Jun 2005 07:43:54 -0700, "Learning Richard"
<learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>
>FanJet wrote:[color=green]
>> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
>> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack on Teri
>> Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find any useful work.
>>
>> Partial fix:
>> foreach bush in politics
>> rm *bush*
>> end foreach
>>[/color]
>
>while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
> delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
>}
>
>much more elegant -- perl[/color]

But more accurate[1]:

while ($member = (@republicans)) {
delete $member if $member eq 'idiot';
}

Why stop with just one?

[1] accurate except int he same flawwed us of the delete function.
[1a] pop would have the effect of removing ALL elements of
@republicans but there are a few that we'd want to have around.


--
gburnore@databasix dot com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Want one? GET one! [url]http://signup.databasix.com[/url]
===========================================================================

Gary L. Burnore wrote:[color=blue]
> On 18 Jun 2005 07:43:54 -0700, "Learning Richard"
> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> >
> >FanJet wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in leadership
> >> curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically motivated attack onTeri
> >> Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he can't seem to find any usefulwork.
> >>
> >> Partial fix:
> >> foreach bush in politics
> >> rm *bush*
> >> end foreach
> >>[/color]
> >
> >while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
> > delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
> >}
> >
> >much more elegant -- perl[/color]
>
> But more accurate[1]:
>
> while ($member = (@republicans)) {
> delete $member if $member eq 'idiot';
> }
>
> Why stop with just one?
>
> [1] accurate except int he same flawwed us of the delete function.
> [1a] pop would have the effect of removing ALL elements of
> @republicans but there are a few that we'd want to have around.
>[/color]

fine then, lets use a hash:



for $moron (keys %republicans) {
# for burnore -- just assume the keys are unique integers
# this allows us to have more than one BUSH
if (uc $republicans{$moron} eq 'BUSH') {
delete $republicans{$moron};
}
else {
admonish ($republicans{$moron});
}
}

sub admonish {
my $moron = shift;
print "$moron is still a moron\n";
}



[color=blue]
>
> --
> gburnore@databasix dot com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How you look depends on where you go.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
> | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
> DataBasix | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
> | ÝÛ³ 3 4 1 4 2 ݳ޳ 6 9 0 6 9 ÝÛ³
> Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official Proof of Purchase
> ===========================================================================
> Want one? GET one! [url]http://signup.databasix.com[/url]
> ===========================================================================[/color]

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:[color=green]
>> On 18 Jun 2005 07:43:54 -0700, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> FanJet wrote:
>>>> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in
>>>> leadership curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically
>>>> motivated attack on Teri Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he
>>>> can't seem to find any useful work.
>>>>
>>>> Partial fix:
>>>> foreach bush in politics
>>>> rm *bush*
>>>> end foreach
>>>>
>>>
>>> while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
>>> delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
>>> }
>>>
>>> much more elegant -- perl[/color]
>>
>> But more accurate[1]:
>>
>> while ($member = (@republicans)) {
>> delete $member if $member eq 'idiot';
>> }
>>
>> Why stop with just one?
>>
>> [1] accurate except int he same flawwed us of the delete function.
>> [1a] pop would have the effect of removing ALL elements of
>> @republicans but there are a few that we'd want to have around.
>>[/color]
>
> fine then, lets use a hash:
>
>
>
> for $moron (keys %republicans) {
> # for burnore -- just assume the keys are unique integers
> # this allows us to have more than one BUSH
> if (uc $republicans{$moron} eq 'BUSH') {
> delete $republicans{$moron};
> }
> else {
> admonish ($republicans{$moron});
> }
> }
>
> sub admonish {
> my $moron = shift;
> print "$moron is still a moron\n";
> }[/color]

0101010001101000011001010010000001101110011001010110111101100011011011110110
1110011100110010000001101100011010010110101101100101001000000101001101100011
0110111101110100011101000010110000100000010001010111001001101001011000110010
1100001000000100001101101000011000010111001001101100011001010111001100100000
0110000101101110011001000010000001110100011010000110010100100000011011000110
1001011010110110010100101100001000000111011101101001011011000110110000100000
0110001101101111011011100111010001101001011011100111010101100101001000000111
0100011011110010000001110011011100000110111101110101011101000010000001101111
0110011001100110001000000110110001101001011001010111001100100000011000010110
1110011001000010000001100001011000100111001101110101011100100110010000100000
0111001001101000011001010111010001101111011100100110100101100011011000010110
1100001000000111000001101111011011000110100101110100011010010110001101100001
0110110000100000011011100110111101101110011100110110010101101110011100110110
0101001000000111010101101110011101000110100101101100001000000111010001101000
0110010100100000011001010110111001100100001000000110111101100110001000000111
0100011010010110110101100101001011100010000001000011011000010111001101100101
0010000001100011011011000110111101110011011001010110010000101110

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:[color=green]
>> On 18 Jun 2005 07:43:54 -0700, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> FanJet wrote:
>>>> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in
>>>> leadership curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically
>>>> motivated attack on Teri Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he
>>>> can't seem to find any useful work.
>>>>
>>>> Partial fix:
>>>> foreach bush in politics
>>>> rm *bush*
>>>> end foreach
>>>>
>>>
>>> while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
>>> delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
>>> }
>>>
>>> much more elegant -- perl[/color]
>>
>> But more accurate[1]:
>>
>> while ($member = (@republicans)) {
>> delete $member if $member eq 'idiot';
>> }
>>
>> Why stop with just one?
>>
>> [1] accurate except int he same flawwed us of the delete function.
>> [1a] pop would have the effect of removing ALL elements of
>> @republicans but there are a few that we'd want to have around.
>>[/color]
>
> fine then, lets use a hash:
>
>
>
> for $moron (keys %republicans) {
> # for burnore -- just assume the keys are unique integers
> # this allows us to have more than one BUSH
> if (uc $republicans{$moron} eq 'BUSH') {
> delete $republicans{$moron};
> }
> else {
> admonish ($republicans{$moron});
> }
> }
>
> sub admonish {
> my $moron = shift;
> print "$moron is still a moron\n";
> }[/color]

Hmm funny, I tried sending something in Binary but it didn't post. I wonder
why....

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> Gary L. Burnore wrote:[color=green]
>> On 18 Jun 2005 07:43:54 -0700, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>>>
>>>
>>> FanJet wrote:
>>>> Feeling the need to underscore the family 'incompetence in
>>>> leadership curse', the lowest bush, continues his politically
>>>> motivated attack on Teri Shivo. Like his looser brother in DC, he
>>>> can't seem to find any useful work.
>>>>
>>>> Partial fix:
>>>> foreach bush in politics
>>>> rm *bush*
>>>> end foreach
>>>>
>>>
>>> while ($idiot = pop @republicans) {
>>> delete $idiot if $idiot eq 'BUSH';
>>> }
>>>
>>> much more elegant -- perl[/color]
>>
>> But more accurate[1]:
>>
>> while ($member = (@republicans)) {
>> delete $member if $member eq 'idiot';
>> }
>>
>> Why stop with just one?
>>
>> [1] accurate except int he same flawwed us of the delete function.
>> [1a] pop would have the effect of removing ALL elements of
>> @republicans but there are a few that we'd want to have around.
>>[/color]
>
> fine then, lets use a hash:
>
>
>
> for $moron (keys %republicans) {
> # for burnore -- just assume the keys are unique integers
> # this allows us to have more than one BUSH
> if (uc $republicans{$moron} eq 'BUSH') {
> delete $republicans{$moron};
> }
> else {
> admonish ($republicans{$moron});
> }
> }
>
> sub admonish {
> my $moron = shift;
> print "$moron is still a moron\n";
> }[/color]

<010101000110100001100101001000000110111001100101011011110110001101101111011
0
1110011100110010000001101100011010010110101101100101001000000101001101100011
0110111101110100011101000010110000100000010001010111001001101001011000110010
1100001000000100001101101000011000010111001001101100011001010111001100100000
0110000101101110011001000010000001110100011010000110010100100000011011000110
1001011010110110010100101100001000000111011101101001011011000110110000100000
0110001101101111011011100111010001101001011011100111010101100101001000000111
0100011011110010000001110011011100000110111101110101011101000010000001101111
0110011001100110001000000110110001101001011001010111001100100000011000010110
1110011001000010000001100001011000100111001101110101011100100110010000100000
0111001001101000011001010111010001101111011100100110100101100011011000010110
1100001000000111000001101111011011000110100101110100011010010110001101100001
0110110000100000011011100110111101101110011100110110010101101110011100110110
0101001000000111010101101110011101000110100101101100001000000111010001101000
0110010100100000011001010110111001100100001000000110111101100110001000000111
0100011010010110110101100101001011100010000001000011011000010111001101100101
0010000001100011011011000110111101110011011001010110010000101110>

Try that again...