OT ON NOW: Hardball Discussion Of Downing Street Memo

MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT

In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
[email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
> MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT[/color]

What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ st
mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
of the DNC and howard dyno.
--

On 20 Jun 2005 20:46:11 -0700, [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
[color=blue]
>MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT[/color]

You were probably the only one that saw it....

Let us know what was said.

btw there are no Downing Street Memo's....the 'reporter' destroyed
them...LOL


--

Scott in Florida

Dbu_^ wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
>[color=green]
> > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT[/color]
>
> What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ st
> mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
> of the DNC and howard dyno.
> --
>[/color]

They raised the question of why the British and American
administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
false.

Learning Richard wrote:[color=blue]
> Dbu_^ wrote:[color=green]
> > In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> > [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> > > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT[/color]
> >
> > What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ st
> > mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
> > of the DNC and howard dyno.
> > --
> >[/color]
>
> They raised the question of why the British and American
> administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
> false.
>[/color]

Elaborate on this DNC link, Dbu

In article <1119366173.992183.102870@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:

[color=blue]
> Elaborate on this DNC link, Dbu[/color]

christ st mattews son works for howie dyno per mattews on his show.
Hey, it don't take a wizard to figure things out. Besides have you ever
watched hardballs during the election it was a mouthpiece for kerry and
the dnc, any fool could see that including you richard?
--

Dbu_^ wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <1119366173.992183.102870@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[color=green]
> > Elaborate on this DNC link, Dbu[/color]
>
> christ st mattews son works for howie dyno per mattews on his show.
> Hey, it don't take a wizard to figure things out.
>[/color]

Close, but no cigar. Actually, his son worked on the Dean campaign
back at the end of 2003 through the time when Dean "Jumped the Shark"
with the Dean scream, and subsequently went down in flames.

Besides, he was a grown man... look at George HW Bush! He's whooping
it up in Kennebunkport with Bubba right now! You don't hold that
against W, do you?
[color=blue]
>
> Besides have you ever
> watched hardballs during the election it was a mouthpiece for kerry and
> the dnc, any fool could see that including you richard?
>[/color]

There definitely was some DNC-inspired feel-good bullshit emanating
from Hardball during the 2004 campaign... but you should be happy for
that, since it tricked a lot of those very college kids to stay at home
and hit the gravity bong instead of voting on election day.

Marybeth Cahill (Kerry campaign manager) is a snivelling moron. I
blame her, not Hardball.

It appears that Chris Matthews actually likes our old Maverick buddy
John McCain anyway.

(Hmmm should I expire this post? nah)

On 21 Jun 2005 08:01:00 -0700, "Learning Richard"
<learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>
>
>Dbu_^ wrote:[color=green]
>> In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
>> [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT[/color]
>>
>> What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ st
>> mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
>> of the DNC and howard dyno.
>> --
>>[/color]
>
>They raised the question of why the British and American
>administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
>false.[/color]


Why should they?

Who would believe them?

How can you be against something that does not exist?

--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk@Florida.com> wrote in message
news:g7qgb1pc5mphfd4q6bld006q6h2659b63f@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On 21 Jun 2005 08:01:00 -0700, "Learning Richard"
> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >
> >
> >Dbu_^ wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
> >>
> >> > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT
> >>
> >> What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ[/color][/color][/color]
st[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
> >> of the DNC and howard dyno.
> >> --
> >>[/color]
> >
> >They raised the question of why the British and American
> >administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
> >false.[/color]
>
>
> Why should they?
>
> Who would believe them?
>[/color]

Well, you would, for a start. You already appear to believe they're fakes
and that's without any government denial at all. You appear to think this
journalist is making up these memos out of whole cloth, without any apparent
evidence.

Think how much more support the "fakes" idea could get with a simple denial
from a properly placed source in the British Government.
[color=blue]
> How can you be against something that does not exist?
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]

If fake, they should be denounced to promote honesty as a social good, if
nothing else. I know, I know: the truth for truth's sake is alien to you.

If they're fakes, why tolerate a liar? If they're fakes, the journalist
should be held to account. If they're fakes, why tolerate the scandal?
This isn't winning Blair's government any friends. It didn't cost him the
recent election but Blair does appear to have lost some seats in Parliament
due to the publication of the Downing Street Memo.

If the memos aren't being denounced as fakes, it's because they're real.

It's that simple, Scott. You're living in denial.

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:30:55 -0500, "DH" <DH@stargate.nospam.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk@Florida.com> wrote in message
>news:g7qgb1pc5mphfd4q6bld006q6h2659b63f@4ax.com...[color=green]
>> On 21 Jun 2005 08:01:00 -0700, "Learning Richard"
>> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>[color=darkred]
>> >
>> >
>> >Dbu_^ wrote:
>> >> In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
>> >> [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT
>> >>
>> >> What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with christ[/color][/color]
>st[color=green][color=darkred]
>> >> mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a mouthpiece
>> >> of the DNC and howard dyno.
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >
>> >They raised the question of why the British and American
>> >administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
>> >false.[/color]
>>
>>
>> Why should they?
>>
>> Who would believe them?
>>[/color]
>
>Well, you would, for a start. You already appear to believe they're fakes
>and that's without any government denial at all. You appear to think this
>journalist is making up these memos out of whole cloth, without any apparent
>evidence.
>
>Think how much more support the "fakes" idea could get with a simple denial
>from a properly placed source in the British Government.
>[color=green]
>> How can you be against something that does not exist?
>>
>> --
>>
>> Scott in Florida[/color]
>
>If fake, they should be denounced to promote honesty as a social good, if
>nothing else. I know, I know: the truth for truth's sake is alien to you.
>
>If they're fakes, why tolerate a liar? If they're fakes, the journalist
>should be held to account. If they're fakes, why tolerate the scandal?
>This isn't winning Blair's government any friends. It didn't cost him the
>recent election but Blair does appear to have lost some seats in Parliament
>due to the publication of the Downing Street Memo.
>
>If the memos aren't being denounced as fakes, it's because they're real.[/color]

Oh horse hockey....

You are dreamin.....
[color=blue]
>
>It's that simple, Scott. You're living in denial.
>[/color]

--

Scott in Florida

"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk@Florida.com> wrote in message
news:ghahb11nfvvtn6tnfcddtp2a01g74124kq@4ax.com...[color=blue]
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 16:30:55 -0500, "DH" <DH@stargate.nospam.com>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >"Scott in Florida" <JustAsk@Florida.com> wrote in message
> >news:g7qgb1pc5mphfd4q6bld006q6h2659b63f@4ax.com...[color=darkred]
> >> On 21 Jun 2005 08:01:00 -0700, "Learning Richard"
> >> <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Dbu_^ wrote:
> >> >> In article <1119325571.299510.108690@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> [email]lane.walker@gmail.com[/email] wrote:
> >> >> > MSNBC... David Kay / James Woolsey, etc. 11 PM EDT
> >> >> What did they say about it? I stopped watching hardballs with[/color][/color][/color]
christ[color=blue][color=green]
> >st[color=darkred]
> >> >> mattews for his link to the DNC. His show is nothing but a[/color][/color][/color]
mouthpiece[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> >> of the DNC and howard dyno.
> >> >They raised the question of why the British and American
> >> >administrations have not come out against them if they are in fact
> >> >false.
> >> Why should they?
> >> Who would believe them?[/color]
> >Well, you would, for a start. You already appear to believe they're[/color][/color]
fakes[color=blue][color=green]
> >and that's without any government denial at all. You appear to think[/color][/color]
this[color=blue][color=green]
> >journalist is making up these memos out of whole cloth, without any[/color][/color]
apparent[color=blue][color=green]
> >evidence.
> >Think how much more support the "fakes" idea could get with a simple[/color][/color]
denial[color=blue][color=green]
> >from a properly placed source in the British Government.[color=darkred]
> >> How can you be against something that does not exist?
> >> Scott in Florida[/color]
> >If fake, they should be denounced to promote honesty as a social good, if
> >nothing else. I know, I know: the truth for truth's sake is alien to[/color][/color]
you.[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> >If they're fakes, why tolerate a liar? If they're fakes, the journalist
> >should be held to account. If they're fakes, why tolerate the scandal?
> >This isn't winning Blair's government any friends. It didn't cost him[/color][/color]
the[color=blue][color=green]
> >recent election but Blair does appear to have lost some seats in[/color][/color]
Parliament[color=blue][color=green]
> >due to the publication of the Downing Street Memo.
> >
> >If the memos aren't being denounced as fakes, it's because they're real.[/color]
>
> Oh horse hockey....
>
> You are dreamin.....
>[/color]

Let's see; reason and facts entirely refuted by "horse hockey."

So well done, Scott. You should be proud of your intellectual prowess..

.... if you're two years old.

[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> >It's that simple, Scott. You're living in denial.
> >[/color]
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida[/color]