Virginia's pledge law sustained

[url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]

Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...

Mark wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>
> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]

you mean the kind that isn't a sheep?

Mark, 8/11/2005, 8:54:22 PM, wrote:
[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>
> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]

Now you see why I live in the South. Not only do we speak funny but we
also love God and our country. At least Washington's madness hasn't
made it to Richmond yet.

--
"Golf and sex are the only things you can enjoy without being good at
them."
Jimmy DeMaret

badgolferman wrote:[color=blue]
> Mark, 8/11/2005, 8:54:22 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
> > [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
> >
> > Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]
>
> Now you see why I live in the South. Not only do we speak funny but we
> also love God and our country. At least Washington's madness hasn't
> made it to Richmond yet.[/color]

heh... good old Richmond, land of the Confederate Monuments. When I
lived there, had a friend come into town from Chicago, who had never
seen Monument Ave. before. She took a picture of every Confederate
statue because she swore no one would believe her!

Then the Arthur Ashe statue went up -- and its a really _bad_ statue.
Looks like he's threatening the kids with his tennis racket. sheesh.

"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0e5vq6295bqwo000@news.readfreenews.net...[color=blue]
> Mark, 8/11/2005, 8:54:22 PM, wrote:
>[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>>
>> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]
>
> Now you see why I live in the South. Not only do we speak funny but we
> also love God and our country. At least Washington's madness hasn't
> made it to Richmond yet.
>
> --
> "Golf and sex are the only things you can enjoy without being good at
> them."
> Jimmy DeMaret[/color]

Even during the war it took 4 years to get from Washington to Richmond.
Now it probably takes even longer.

Charles of Kankakee

Mark wrote:[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>
> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]

Now, maybe, they can address the tertiary sh*t like education.

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:24:26 GMT, "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com>
wrote:
[color=blue]
>Mark wrote:[color=green]
>> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>>
>> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]
>
>Now, maybe, they can address the tertiary sh*t like education.
>[/color]

gawd....why teach the chillins to read rite and subtact?

they need to know how to put a condom on a bananas...

American *public* education is broken....thanks LIBS....

--

Scott in Florida

Scott in Florida wrote:[color=blue]
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:24:26 GMT, "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>[color=green]
> >Mark wrote:[color=darkred]
> >> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
> >>
> >> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...[/color]
> >
> >Now, maybe, they can address the tertiary sh*t like education.
> >[/color]
>
> gawd....why teach the chillins to read rite and subtact?
>
> they need to know how to put a condom on a bananas...[/color]

OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
the conservative kooks).

In between lets focus on my favorite subject: MATH
[color=blue]
>
> American *public* education is broken....thanks LIBS....[/color]

Can anyone say Unfunded Madate? Here's a clue: No Child Left Behind

Children are not nearly so stupid as to think that the Pledge is religious
exercise. The court is correct, the Pledge contains a religious reference
but is not a religious exercise.

Meyer's kids do have a legal right to opt out of reciting the Pledge, but he
has no right to cause the Pledge to be removed from the classroom. The court
ruled correctly.




"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1123808062.686775.164560@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...[color=blue]
> [url]http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20050810-115848-4825r.htm[/url]
>
> Mr. Myers sounds like Richard's kind of Christian...
>[/color]

"Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message[color=blue]
>
> OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
> liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
> the conservative kooks).
>[/color]

Nobody is asking public school to teach intelligent design, all we want is
to NOT teach evolution as the only explanation as to how life came about.
Evolution, by definition, only talks about how life has changed, it fails to
address the origins of life, and the truth of those origins might be held
differently by a child coming into the classroom. Teach that evolution is
ONE of the possible explanations, and most of us will be happy.


[color=blue]
> In between lets focus on my favorite subject: MATH
>[color=green]
>>
>> American *public* education is broken....thanks LIBS....[/color]
>
> Can anyone say Unfunded Madate? Here's a clue: No Child Left Behind
>[/color]

American Public Education was broken a long time before No Child Left Behind
came along.

J Strickland wrote:[color=blue]
> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message[color=green]
>>
>> OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
>> liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
>> the conservative kooks).
>>[/color]
>
> Nobody is asking public school to teach intelligent design, all we
> want is to NOT teach evolution as the only explanation as to how life
> came about. Evolution, by definition, only talks about how life has
> changed, it fails to address the origins of life, and the truth of
> those origins might be held differently by a child coming into the
> classroom. Teach that evolution is ONE of the possible explanations,
> and most of us will be happy.[/color]

Not only have you mised out on science, you need to keep up with politics:

[url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200493.html[/url]

To quickly catch you up to speed: the origin of life is fully addressed by
science. Creationism (Intelligent Design) isn't taught in schools because
it's religion not science. The only time there's *any* debate about this is
when lazy thinkers congregate.

"FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Z0aLe.1172$nL3.70153@newshog.newsread.com...[color=blue]
>J Strickland wrote:[color=green]
>> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message[color=darkred]
>>>
>>> OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
>>> liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
>>> the conservative kooks).
>>>[/color]
>>
>> Nobody is asking public school to teach intelligent design, all we
>> want is to NOT teach evolution as the only explanation as to how life
>> came about. Evolution, by definition, only talks about how life has
>> changed, it fails to address the origins of life, and the truth of
>> those origins might be held differently by a child coming into the
>> classroom. Teach that evolution is ONE of the possible explanations,
>> and most of us will be happy.[/color]
>
> Not only have you mised out on science, you need to keep up with politics:
>
> [url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200493.html[/url]
>
> To quickly catch you up to speed: the origin of life is fully addressed by
> science. Creationism (Intelligent Design) isn't taught in schools because
> it's religion not science. The only time there's *any* debate about this
> is when lazy thinkers congregate.[/color]

Not only have you misrepresented the facts, I believe you have also been
left out of the pool of those who have common sense. To say that Creationism
is 'religion' only shows just how shallow your thinking really is. Your
canned science in the efforts to change the 'theory' of evolution into a
'law' is an age old trick tried by many more educated and more swaying than
yourself. The 'science' you accept is more postulate than creationism could
ever be.

Therefore, the logical conclusion is that those who accept what you call
'science' without proof are really the lazy thinkers.

[url]http://www.icr.org/[/url]

Some videos that evolutionists have real problems with, Most are free
downloads such as 'A Question of Origins"

This was made by scientists, who according to FanJet are Lazy thinkers.
Funny that it seems that you may be the lazy thinker here.
[url]http://www.creationists.org/videos.html[/url]

Interesting that one of your own evolutionists Dr. Morrow have an audio out
discussing the flaws of evolutionary thinking. Heck, your own side is
confused!


[url]http://www.creationists.org/videos.html[/url]
"Geoman" <Geo@Geo.com> wrote in message
news:Zeudnbec6qavpmDfRVn-1A@adelphia.com...[color=blue]
>
> "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Z0aLe.1172$nL3.70153@newshog.newsread.com...[color=green]
>>J Strickland wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
>>>> liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
>>>> the conservative kooks).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nobody is asking public school to teach intelligent design, all we
>>> want is to NOT teach evolution as the only explanation as to how life
>>> came about. Evolution, by definition, only talks about how life has
>>> changed, it fails to address the origins of life, and the truth of
>>> those origins might be held differently by a child coming into the
>>> classroom. Teach that evolution is ONE of the possible explanations,
>>> and most of us will be happy.[/color]
>>
>> Not only have you mised out on science, you need to keep up with
>> politics:
>>
>> [url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200493.html[/url]
>>
>> To quickly catch you up to speed: the origin of life is fully addressed
>> by science. Creationism (Intelligent Design) isn't taught in schools
>> because it's religion not science. The only time there's *any* debate
>> about this is when lazy thinkers congregate.[/color]
>
> Not only have you misrepresented the facts, I believe you have also been
> left out of the pool of those who have common sense. To say that
> Creationism is 'religion' only shows just how shallow your thinking really
> is. Your canned science in the efforts to change the 'theory' of evolution
> into a 'law' is an age old trick tried by many more educated and more
> swaying than yourself. The 'science' you accept is more postulate than
> creationism could ever be.
>
> Therefore, the logical conclusion is that those who accept what you call
> 'science' without proof are really the lazy thinkers.
>
> [url]http://www.icr.org/[/url]
>[/color]

Creation wrote:[color=blue]
> Some videos that evolutionists have real problems with, Most are free
> downloads such as 'A Question of Origins"[/color]

Thanks & here's some religious stuff for you:

[url]http://www.scientology.org/[/url]

I guess this is another example of your "Lazy' thinkers, FanJet?

[url]http://www.trueorigin.org/[/url]




"Creation" <Creation@create.com> wrote in message
news:EOadnXPmJJh13WDfRVn-pg@adelphia.com...[color=blue]
> Some videos that evolutionists have real problems with, Most are free
> downloads such as 'A Question of Origins"
>
> This was made by scientists, who according to FanJet are Lazy thinkers.
> Funny that it seems that you may be the lazy thinker here.
> [url]http://www.creationists.org/videos.html[/url]
>
> Interesting that one of your own evolutionists Dr. Morrow have an audio
> out discussing the flaws of evolutionary thinking. Heck, your own side is
> confused!
>
>
> [url]http://www.creationists.org/videos.html[/url]
> "Geoman" <Geo@Geo.com> wrote in message
> news:Zeudnbec6qavpmDfRVn-1A@adelphia.com...[color=green]
>>
>> "FanJet" <FanJet27@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Z0aLe.1172$nL3.70153@newshog.newsread.com...[color=darkred]
>>>J Strickland wrote:
>>>> "Learning Richard" <learningrichard@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>> OK then lets divide time between putting condoms on bananas (for the
>>>>> liberal kooks) and teaching the "Theory" of "Intelligent Design" (for
>>>>> the conservative kooks).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Nobody is asking public school to teach intelligent design, all we
>>>> want is to NOT teach evolution as the only explanation as to how life
>>>> came about. Evolution, by definition, only talks about how life has
>>>> changed, it fails to address the origins of life, and the truth of
>>>> those origins might be held differently by a child coming into the
>>>> classroom. Teach that evolution is ONE of the possible explanations,
>>>> and most of us will be happy.
>>>
>>> Not only have you mised out on science, you need to keep up with
>>> politics:
>>>
>>> [url]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/02/AR2005080200493.html[/url]
>>>
>>> To quickly catch you up to speed: the origin of life is fully addressed
>>> by science. Creationism (Intelligent Design) isn't taught in schools
>>> because it's religion not science. The only time there's *any* debate
>>> about this is when lazy thinkers congregate.[/color]
>>
>> Not only have you misrepresented the facts, I believe you have also been
>> left out of the pool of those who have common sense. To say that
>> Creationism is 'religion' only shows just how shallow your thinking
>> really is. Your canned science in the efforts to change the 'theory' of
>> evolution into a 'law' is an age old trick tried by many more educated
>> and more swaying than yourself. The 'science' you accept is more
>> postulate than creationism could ever be.
>>
>> Therefore, the logical conclusion is that those who accept what you call
>> 'science' without proof are really the lazy thinkers.
>>
>> [url]http://www.icr.org/[/url]
>>[/color]
>
>[/color]