2.7 vs 4.0 Litre Engines - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
2nd Generation (2005+) Discussion area for the 2nd generation of the Toyota Tacoma

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#1 Old 05-27-2006, 03:52 PM
New TN User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
Canada 2.7 vs 4.0 Litre Engines

I'm on the verge of moving out of my 1997 Jeep TJ Sport into a new Tacoma. After reading these forums for a couple of weeks, I get the impression that not many of the regulars are driving the 2.7 litre engine.

I've test driven the 2.7 (in automatic, my local dealer doesn't have a manual at the moment), and it felt reasonibly responsive. However, after driving the big 6 cylinder in the Jeep for 9 years, I'm wondering if I'll miss the larger engine.

My 4x4 days are behind me, and I don't see me hauling a trailer any time in the future.

I suppose what I'm asking for an opinion of highway power on the 2.7 litre engine. I don't do a tonne of highway travel, but don't want to commit to a vehicle that I'll be unhappy with under the hood. I tend to keep my ride for some time....
fpcat is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 05-27-2006, 04:00 PM
Official TN Member
 
Accessdenied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I just came from a 4.0 v6 Ford (92' Explorer) and went with the 2.7 with standard transmission. I am plenty happy with it. For freeway its great, drop it into 4th for big hills or passing and if you push it it will definately go. To me I feel like it has very comparable power to my old car and a lot better gas mileage.

2.7 4x2 5 lug. 30x9.50 BFGoodrich. Gibson exhaust
Accessdenied is offline  
#3 Old 05-27-2006, 05:28 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boulder CO
Posts: 1,488
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
The manual is the better choice as you can gear accordingly to compensate on steep grades etc. I have had no problems with the 2.7 but came from a 88 Ram-50 2.6L that was only 110hp.

No regrets here, especially with 27.7mpg average after 7700 miles. Some here with the 2.7L 4x4 are getting 23-24.

2005 Impulse Red 4x2 Access cab 2.7L 5-speed SR5.
worthywads is offline  
#4 Old 05-28-2006, 12:15 AM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
Get 4WD!

I think you should get the 4x4.It is always better to have and not need.
Than to need it and not have it.
RichR is offline  
#5 Old 05-28-2006, 07:57 AM
Only 48 more payments.
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oxford, MA
Posts: 420
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I'd pass on the 2.7 liter. Especially if you have any sort of hills or plan on pulling/loading up the truck with any sort of weight. I have 2.7 liter and regret nearly daily for no getting the 4.0. Around town driving the 2.7 is fine but add any weight, hills or towing and the thing is gasping for more power.
goldmember is offline  
#6 Old 05-28-2006, 08:11 AM
New TN User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
If you like to drive really fast most or all of the time get the 6cyl but if you want to drive normal the 4 is fine. I have no problems towing my 1500 - 2000 lb trailer and since I dont drive my truck like a sports car I dont miss it.
chitownpete@yah is offline  
#7 Old 05-28-2006, 08:39 AM
Stupid is stupid does
 
lotust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NY Long Island
Posts: 5,553
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
iTrader Score: 3 reviews
If you dont plan on going off roading or pullin a trailer. I would get the 2.7 Though I would test drive them both the 4.0 and the 2.6 and see what you like best. I traded in my 2005 reg cab 5 speed 2.7l 4x4 for a 2006 auto excab v6 4x4 sr5. I would never go back to the 2.7l 4x4 again. I get maybe 1-2 mpg worse with the 4.0 than I did with the 2.7


295/65/18 Goodyear Duratracs:2.5" lift in the front with 1" rear Block
JBA single exhaust:HID's W/Led's inside:Nfabs
E&G grill insert:ARE Z topper:Overhead DVD for my son:Front DVD for me
lotust is offline  
#8 Old 05-28-2006, 05:06 PM
Toyota Purist
 
naiou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Reno, Nevada
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I love my 2.7L!!! I have no complaints and I 4x4 on a regular basis. So, if you want to save some money get the 4cyl!!

Toyota purist -- 'nuff said!
naiou is offline  
#9 Old 05-28-2006, 10:56 PM
New TN User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Iowa
Posts: 42
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I have an '05 2.7 5-speed reg-cab 2wd in Iowa where it's fairly flat.
I have no trouble doing 90 on the interstate with a motorcycle in the back 400miles each way and getting low 20's mpg.

I went with the 4 because they are toyota's most reliable/proven design, though if they did offer the 4.0L in the rag cab 2wd that would be a hoot!
Oconnor is offline  
#10 Old 05-29-2006, 12:26 AM
05 Speedwayblue X-runner
 
rpmspeedyBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Jose CA
Posts: 1,787
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I test drove the 5spd 2.7 and thought it was pretty good until I test drove the X-Runner. I couldn't go back to the 2.7. If you're concern about MPG then I would go with the 2.7. otherwise test drive the 4.0 and decide then.
rpmspeedyBlue is offline  
#11 Old 05-29-2006, 12:29 AM
My name is Blake
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 4,913
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
The 4.0 is a very nice engine.
NorCalTacoma is offline  
#12 Old 05-29-2006, 12:43 AM
Official TN Member
 
Hans Moleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
The rule of thumb is to get the biggest or most powerful engine a particular car has

Donahoe Coilovers & Remote Reservoir Shocks
Total Chaos UCAs
TSB Springs
Hans Moleman is offline  
#13 Old 05-29-2006, 01:42 AM
Official TN Member
 
Tacoma2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I would probably go with the 4.0 if I could, but since I couldn't in the regular cab I'll just be happy with the 23-24 MPG I've gotten the past two tanks.
Tacoma2005 is offline  
#14 Old 05-29-2006, 07:18 AM
New TN User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by fpcat
I'm on the verge of moving out of my 1997 Jeep TJ Sport into a new Tacoma. After reading these forums for a couple of weeks, I get the impression that not many of the regulars are driving the 2.7 litre engine.

I've test driven the 2.7 (in automatic, my local dealer doesn't have a manual at the moment), and it felt reasonibly responsive. However, after driving the big 6 cylinder in the Jeep for 9 years, I'm wondering if I'll miss the larger engine.

My 4x4 days are behind me, and I don't see me hauling a trailer any time in the future.

I suppose what I'm asking for an opinion of highway power on the 2.7 litre engine. I don't do a tonne of highway travel, but don't want to commit to a vehicle that I'll be unhappy with under the hood. I tend to keep my ride for some time....
I'm in Montreal and I got the baseline canadian tacoma (5spd 2.7 access-cab 2wd) I made a couple of trip with the bed loaded and the rear suspension bottoming out from all the weight; the truck was perfect on driveability, handling and power. My only wish was for a 4wd version with the 2.7 but Toyota canada chose not to import that flavor of the tacoma.

I get 27-28mpg on the highway driving with an eye on the scangauge to keep MPG over 25.

I would get a 2.7 again but in 4wd. plenty of power with great mpg.
Smog is offline  
#15 Old 05-29-2006, 06:26 PM
New TN User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
Good stuff, folks, thanks for the input. I'm going for the 2.7 for the gas milage and the knowledge that I won't be towing or carrying a lot of cargo (except mountain bikes )

Now I need to go get one of the local dealers down closer to the wholesale cost, and I need to get rid of my TJ. Anyone want to buy a Jeep?
fpcat is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Truck, SUV and Van Forums > Tacoma Forum > 2nd Generation (2005+)

Bookmarks

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome