V6 1GR-FE engine & Octane Rating - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
2nd Generation (2005+) Discussion area for the 2nd generation of the Toyota Tacoma

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#1 Old 04-30-2007, 08:24 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
V6 1GR-FE engine & Octane Rating

This may explain the ongoing debate as to which Octane Rating to use:

1GR-FE 4.0L V6 from a 2007 Toyota Tacoma. The 1GR-FE is the 4.0L version. Bore is 94 mm and stroke is 95 mm. Output is 236 hp (183 kW) at 5200 rpm with 266 lb-ft (382 Nm) of torque at 4000 rpm on 87 octane, and 239 hp at 5200 rpm with 278 lb-ft at 3700 rpm on 91 octane. This engine features Toyota's single VVT-i, variable valve timing, system and a compression ratio of 10.0:1. Inside, the 1GR uses a taper-squish combustion chamber design with matching pistons to improve anti-knocking and engine performance, while also improving intake and fuel efficiency. Toyota adopted a siamese-type intake port, which reduces the surface area of the port walls and prevents fuel from adhering to such walls. This engine has special cast-iron cylinder liners cast into the block, which are a spiny type to improve adhesion between the liner and cylinder block. With these special thin liners it is impossible to bore the block. In the event of cylinder wall damage (scoring, deep protrusions, etc), the entire cylinder block must be replaced. For increased block rigidity, the 1GR also receives a high temperature plastic insulator/protector, which fills the empty space between the outer portion of the cylinders and block material common to open deck engines. For increased cooling efficiency, the 1GR employs water passages between the bores of the engine. There are such 2 passages for each bank for a total of 4. This reduces cylinder hot-spotting and keeps combustion chamber temperatures more uniform.

Some applications:

2003 Toyota 4Runner
2003 Toyota Land Cruiser (Europe)
2005 Toyota Tacoma
2005 Toyota Tundra
2005 Toyota Fortuner (Middle East)
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2007 Toyota Tacoma
Panama Red is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#2 Old 04-30-2007, 10:16 PM
Taking Donations.
 
njmueller363's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 753
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Have you seen gas prices? I wouldn't give a damn if toyota recommended 110, I would still run 87

What exactly qualifies your truck as a rig?
5100s with OME 885s, Pro Comp 7089 w/ 285/70/17 Pro Comp Xtreme Mud Terrains
njmueller363 is offline  
#3 Old 04-30-2007, 10:40 PM
drive it like ya stole it
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: rock hill, sc
Posts: 302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by njmueller363
Have you seen gas prices? I wouldn't give a damn if toyota recommended 110, I would still run 87
im with you on that!! ive been running anything above 89, but im back on regular now the the gas prices have started goin way up again! remember the good ol days(as far as i can remember anyway),when gas was 79 cent a gallon??


Airaid Intake, Flowmaster 40 muffler/stainless tip,aries stainless bull bar/hella 500's,rubber bed mat, Low Profile Toolbox, Polished Stainless Nerf Bars
tacomaman06 is offline  
#4 Old 04-30-2007, 11:33 PM
Official TN Member
 
TRD BlackKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Since I run premium anyway (better gas mileage and driving pleasure), I wish Toyota would up the compression ratio to produce more output.


2005 TRD Off Road 4x4, VSC, TRAC, HAC, DAC, JBL System, Locker Mod, TRAC/VSC Mod,
Flowmaster 50 Series Delta Flow, Custom Bed Lights, Access Cover, URD MAF Sensor Calibrator

TRD BlackKnight is offline  
#5 Old 04-30-2007, 11:40 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: massachusets
Posts: 293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I wish Toyota would up the compression ratio to produce more output.[/QUOTE]

You need one of these to fix that problem.

http://www.urdusa.com/product_info.p..._id=1260198051
reinvent is offline  
#6 Old 05-01-2007, 01:36 AM
One with the force
 
rydr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego/Riverside County
Posts: 1,370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
i was considering doing several dyno runs after runnig both 89 and 91 for several months but i guess this answers my question.

thanks man, where did you get your info?
rydr1 is offline  
#7 Old 05-01-2007, 03:08 AM
Official TN Member
 
TRD BlackKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by reinvent
You need one of these to fix that problem.

http://www.urdusa.com/product_info.p..._id=1260198051
Yeah, true that. With due time after I get a CAI, headers, and dual exhaust hopefully that will be the finishing touch.


2005 TRD Off Road 4x4, VSC, TRAC, HAC, DAC, JBL System, Locker Mod, TRAC/VSC Mod,
Flowmaster 50 Series Delta Flow, Custom Bed Lights, Access Cover, URD MAF Sensor Calibrator

TRD BlackKnight is offline  
#8 Old 05-01-2007, 06:47 AM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 254
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
The good news about this is that we have a light, adaptable and highly efficient engine. The bad news is that it is also disposable, since it can not be rebored if you have cylinder problems or want to increase your engine displacement.
Panama Red is offline  
#9 Old 05-01-2007, 10:22 AM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by njmueller363
Have you seen gas prices? I wouldn't give a damn if toyota recommended 110, I would still run 87
Depends, if you get better mileage on the 89, you'll still save in the end. Doesn't even take that much of an increase in fuel efficiency to make it cost effective.
PA452 is offline  
#10 Old 05-04-2007, 12:39 PM
One with the force
 
rydr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Diego/Riverside County
Posts: 1,370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 4 reviews
i was thinking yesterday when i amost put 91 octane again, where did this guy get his info from?

i was thinking he was the one that did the test but i thought, ok 266 ft lb of torque is to the flywheel so were is the info for 278 ft lb of torque.

i personally wouldnt mind using 91 octane for the gained torque.
rydr1 is offline  
#11 Old 05-04-2007, 01:25 PM
Humble Servant
 
msibille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LOUISIANA
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by PA452
Depends, if you get better mileage on the 89, you'll still save in the end. Doesn't even take that much of an increase in fuel efficiency to make it cost effective.
The (limited) numbers I ran a while back w/ regard to my mileage indicate I'm ahead w/ higher octane when 87 is over $3.10/gal, but the increase in mileage is not enough to overcome the price difference when it's below.
msibille is offline  
#12 Old 05-04-2007, 01:26 PM
Humble Servant
 
msibille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LOUISIANA
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Panama Red
The good news about this is that we have a light, adaptable and highly efficient engine. The bad news is that it is also disposable, since it can not be rebored if you have cylinder problems or want to increase your engine displacement.
But when was the last time that you had to rebore an engine?
I know it is done, but unlike 50 yrs ago, it's not at all common.
msibille is offline  
#13 Old 05-04-2007, 02:57 PM
One with the force
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 2 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by msibille
The (limited) numbers I ran a while back w/ regard to my mileage indicate I'm ahead w/ higher octane when 87 is over $3.10/gal, but the increase in mileage is not enough to overcome the price difference when it's below.
It doesn't matter what the price of 87 octane is. The differential between 87 and 91 octane is always about $0.20 regardless of how high gas prices get. Whether or not the added fuel efficiency is worth the additional $0.20 has nothing to do with the total price of the gas.

This brings up the other thing I don't understand: people who switch to lower octane gas when the prices go up. 91 octane is always 20 cents more than 87 octane. No matter what the gas prices are currently, it always costs about $3.50 more to fill up with 91 octane. Why do people only worry about saving the $3.50 when the gas prices go up? Makes no sense.
Fluxaholic is offline  
#14 Old 05-04-2007, 03:17 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 222
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluxaholic
It doesn't matter what the price of 87 octane is. The differential between 87 and 91 octane is always about $0.20 regardless of how high gas prices get. Whether or not the added fuel efficiency is worth the additional $0.20 has nothing to do with the total price of the gas.
Actually, I've been noticing lately they're actually factoring that in. I've noticed a 15 cent difference some places between 87 and 89, sometimes more.

But I agree. And FWIW, my truck does get better mileage with 89 than 87, and doing the math, I find that in the end I save by going the 89 route, even if the mileage is only slightly better.
PA452 is offline  
#15 Old 05-04-2007, 03:52 PM
Humble Servant
 
msibille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LOUISIANA
Posts: 1,158
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fluxaholic
It doesn't matter what the price of 87 octane is. The differential between 87 and 91 octane is always about $0.20 regardless of how high gas prices get. Whether or not the added fuel efficiency is worth the additional $0.20 has nothing to do with the total price of the gas.

Sorry, but you're mistaken-

Example- These aren't the actual numbers as I don't have that info in front of me, but let's say 87 octane is $2.75/gal and 91 is $2.95
If I get 16.90 mpg with 87 that's 16.27c/mi
If I get 17.75 mpg with 91 that's 16.62c/mi
=> Cheaper to use 87 octane even though the 91 gives me 5% better mileage per gal.

Second example- Let's say 87 octane is $4.10/gal and 91 is $4.30/gal
If I get 16.90 mpg with 87 that's 24.26c/mi
If I get 17.75 mpg with 91 that's 24.23c/mi
=> Cheaper to use 91 octane


Contrary to intuition, if the 91 octane price was a fixed percentage more than 87, then it would either always be cheaper to use 91 or always cheaper to use 87.

Example - if 91 octane cost 10% more than 87, then you would have to get 10% better mileage with 91 octane in order to break even. (if you only got 5% better mileage, it would cost you 4.8% more to drive w/ 91 octane)


The fact that, as you pointed out, the differential price rarely changes much at all, despite 87 octane going from $1.50 to $3 per gal is precisely the reason why it makes a difference as to what the price of 87 octane is. (since you can state the price of 91 as [price of 87 + 0.20] in your example) It could also be described by saying that when 91 octane is above a certain price -assuming that the price differential is the same.

Last edited by msibille; 05-04-2007 at 03:58 PM.
msibille is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Truck, SUV and Van Forums > Tacoma Forum > 2nd Generation (2005+)

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome