Here's my result: 149.1 whp and 162.1 lb/ft of torque.
They did total of 4 runs there because for my first run the computer activated tranction control (it was confused) so the result was low, but when they did it the 3rd time the computer didn't activate it so that's when I got the correct reading.
I'll scan the graphs in when I can borrow a scanner from someone ASAP.
I'm totally satisfied with the result, I think I should get better numbers because it's almost time for me to get oil-change plus I'm still using the original platinum spark-plugs.
Henry & Phi: I would like to see your numbers!
94-96 shouldn't really make a difference. The only difference that the 96 1MZ-FE has from the 94-95 is the ignition wiring. 94-95 has the same amount of coil packs as cylinders. The 96 uses 3 coil packs...and the 3 plugs in the rear bank share off the front. The 97-up is like the 96, but the MAF systems and other components are different. Ratko...were you running premium octane and have you had a tune up lately? Regardless...those numbers are all on target.
Hmmm, how did Dickson manage 15 more torque (units? ft/lbs?) than Ratko? That's interesting....
How many clicks on your car Dickson? 65K? You probably don't need to change your plugs for at least another year...I changed mine at 95K along with my timing belt...should've waited till 120K.
Man, if I have time tomorrow, I'm gonna dyno my car...I have to see where I am relative to you guys. My engine's 10 years old, but hopefully my mods will help out.
Thanked 4,294,967,295 Times in 4,294,967,294 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
On 2001-12-02 00:12, Flipside909 [SC³] wrote:
94-96 shouldn't really make a difference. The only difference that the 96 1MZ-FE has from the 94-95 is the ignition wiring. 94-95 has the same amount of coil packs as cylinders. The 96 uses 3 coil packs...and the 3 plugs in the rear bank share off the front. The 97-up is like the 96, but the MAF systems and other components are different. Ratko...were you running premium octane and have you had a tune up lately? Regardless...those numbers are all on target.
I got about 185K on the odometer, and im a little over due for an oil change. Ive been running 91 octane all this weekend but whats interesting on the dyno is where the ECT kicked in (at least thats my guess) at around 3700 rpm, it looks nice. However, you can see that the graph is quite bumpy on most parts which i think is due to some imbalance in my wheels. Those dynos pick up everything.
On 2001-12-02 02:48, Henry wrote:
How many clicks on your car Dickson? 65K? You probably don't need to change your plugs for at least another year...I changed mine at 95K along with my timing belt...should've waited till 120K.
It's got close to 72K right now. Yea I know I can still run the plugs to 90K+ but I want to see if there will be any performance gain at all if I switch to Iridiums.
switching to bigger spark plugs might actually hurt you perfromance if u still keep the stcok injectors (at least what I've been told)
It was funny yesterday though, how the guy got both our cars on the thing.
Ratkos tends to make more of a high pitched noise where as mines a deeper ine, go figure.
On 2001-12-02 11:51, DaksGT wrote:
It was funny yesterday though, how the guy got both our cars on the thing.
Ratkos tends to make more of a high pitched noise where as mines a deeper ine, go figure.
The AutoGuide.com network consists of the largest network of enthusiast-owned enthusiast-operated automotive communities.
AutoGuide.com provides the latest car reviews, auto show coverage, new car prices, and automotive news. The AutoGuide network operates more than 100 automotive forums where our users consult peers for shopping information and advice, and share opinions as a community.
ToyotaNation.com is an independent Toyota/Lexus enthusiast website. ToyotaNation.com is not sponsored by or in any way affiliated with Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. The Toyota, Lexus and Scion names and logos are trademarks owned by Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.
Linear Mode
