2014 Corvette Revealed - Page 6 - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
General Discussion General discussion of basically anything automotive-related.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
#76 Old 01-16-2013, 08:18 PM
ALSO AVAILABLE IN SOBER
 
Zembonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,835
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 177
Thanked 787 Times in 632 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vmax2007 View Post
Exactly! How many cars enveloped you in 50 "smart" airbags in a crash prior to 2005?

Now they are putting in sensors to tell the morons that are texting that they are swerving out of their lane.
Man... we are on the same side on this one. I can't believe all of the idiotproofing they add to cars now... and how many people think it's great.

A sea of morons I tell ya.........


Zembonez is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
#77 Old 01-16-2013, 08:19 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,003
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 359 Times in 326 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I have to agree that drivers are worse these days. In the past a lot of our customers got various types of accidents. These days pretty much half of them are being rear ended or crashing from the rear. Our fleet had to grow by 50 cars in the time I've worked to cover the increase in insurance replacements. Its probably excellent business to be a body repair shop these days.

1986 MX-73 Cressida 5M-GE 290,000+ kms - SOLD (1986-2013)
2004 GD-67 Impreza EJ25 240,000+ kms - SOLD (2011-2014)
2014 ZNA FR-S FA20 7000+ kms - Daily
Jegan_V is offline  
#78 Old 01-16-2013, 08:23 PM
ALSO AVAILABLE IN SOBER
 
Zembonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,835
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Thanks: 177
Thanked 787 Times in 632 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Our area has about twice as many huge body shops as it did 10 years ago... and they are all busy. In an area of approximately 3 million people that is growing, but not enough to warrant twice as many shops.

State Farm reports a 40% increase in claims over the same period (only company I deal with regularly).


Zembonez is offline  
#79 Old 01-16-2013, 09:01 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Modern cars have had numerous airbags and side impact braces since the mid to late 90's. If it was simply a matter of air bags and modern improvements to safety features we would have seen a significant drop before 2005. I would think the more likely explanation for the drop in fatalities is due to the fact that fewer young people own and drive cars now than did in the past. Young drivers lack experience and are more likely to do something stupid behind the wheel of car which leads to fatalities. Fewer young drivers on the road means fewer fatalities.

I suppose you can either accept hard data or you can stick with "No drivers are worse because I drive a car and I say so." Which doesn't really hold any credibility for me but whatever works for you guys.



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.
Xenos is offline  
#80 Old 01-16-2013, 09:08 PM
TN Post Wh*re
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland Oh
Posts: 7,900
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 332 Post(s)
Thanks: 1,013
Thanked 215 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zembonez View Post
Our area has about twice as many huge body shops as it did 10 years ago... and they are all busy. In an area of approximately 3 million people that is growing, but not enough to warrant twice as many shops.

State Farm reports a 40% increase in claims over the same period (only company I deal with regularly).


Having a lot of Air Bags will do that. Drivers feel their invincible being enveloped in "pillows" on all four sides.
zythr is online now  
#81 Old 01-16-2013, 09:15 PM
Banned as a troll
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 528
Thanked 345 Times in 277 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenos View Post
Modern cars have had numerous airbags and side impact braces since the mid to late 90's. If it was simply a matter of air bags and modern improvements to safety features we would have seen a significant drop before 2005. I would think the more likely explanation for the drop in fatalities is due to the fact that fewer young people own and drive cars now than did in the past. Young drivers lack experience and are more likely to do something stupid behind the wheel of car which leads to fatalities. Fewer young drivers on the road means fewer fatalities.

I suppose you can either accept hard data or you can stick with "No drivers are worse because I drive a car and I say so." Which doesn't really hold any credibility for me but whatever works for you guys.

Wow, you are one arrogant motherf***er.

And, a wrong one at that.

My wife's 2004 Impala had 2 airbags. They were not the modern "smart" airbags either.

Get a clue.

Oh, and please post some "hard data" to support your theory that there are fewer young drivers.

Last edited by Vmax2007; 01-16-2013 at 09:18 PM.
Vmax2007 is offline  
#82 Old 01-16-2013, 09:35 PM
Banned as a troll
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 528
Thanked 345 Times in 277 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zembonez View Post
Our area has about twice as many huge body shops as it did 10 years ago... and they are all busy. In an area of approximately 3 million people that is growing, but not enough to warrant twice as many shops.

State Farm reports a 40% increase in claims over the same period (only company I deal with regularly).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenos View Post
Modern cars have had numerous airbags and side impact braces since the mid to late 90's. If it was simply a matter of air bags and modern improvements to safety features we would have seen a significant drop before 2005. I would think the more likely explanation for the drop in fatalities is due to the fact that fewer young people own and drive cars now than did in the past. Young drivers lack experience and are more likely to do something stupid behind the wheel of car which leads to fatalities. Fewer young drivers on the road means fewer fatalities.

I suppose you can either accept hard data or you can stick with "No drivers are worse because I drive a car and I say so." Which doesn't really hold any credibility for me but whatever works for you guys.
And where is your hard data?
Vmax2007 is offline  
#83 Old 01-16-2013, 10:14 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
http://www.autoguide.com/auto-news/2...-the-road.html


Quote:
Recent studies at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute show the share of 16- to 39-year-olds with driver's licenses declined markedly between 1983 and 2008. The greatest decreases were among drivers in their late teens and early 20s
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/04...n_1406881.html


Quote:
The number of teen drivers has dramatically decreased over the past couple of decades. In 1983, 69% of all 17-year-olds had driverís licenses. By 2008, only half of 17-year-olds had licenses. Whatís behind the big drop?



As I said, you can either accept hard data or continue to claim that drivers today are worse just because you say so.



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.
Xenos is offline  
#84 Old 01-16-2013, 10:45 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
The total number of car accidents in America in 1990 (fatal and non-fatal combined) was 11.5 million. In 2009 the number was 10.8 million. The highest year was 2000 with 13.4 million. On average however over the past decade the number has been 10 million and some change annually. Which means guess what fellas, drivers in America are not getting worse, they are just about as bad as they have always been. As I said.

Or here you can read the data yourself.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/stat...es/12s1103.pdf


Isn't hard data fun? lol



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.
Xenos is offline  
#85 Old 01-16-2013, 10:59 PM
G'day mate
 
gold94corolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,176
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 703 Post(s)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 884 Times in 823 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
gold94corolla is offline  
#86 Old 01-16-2013, 11:01 PM
Banned as a troll
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 0
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 528
Thanked 345 Times in 277 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
So Xenos, are you trying to tell us that today's drivers are no more distracted than they were before the cell phone (and other electronic gadgets) era began?

Seriously?

The "hard data" you posted does NOT conclude that drivers are not worse than they were before. there are many variables that contribute. i.e. Anti-lock brakes and other safety features prevent many accidents which offsets accidents cause by inattentiveness.
Vmax2007 is offline  
#87 Old 01-16-2013, 11:05 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by gold94corolla View Post
I like the tail lights.
I agree. I know there's a lot of purists that are all in a snit about the tail lamps. I think the new car looks really good and it's a marked improvement over the current body style.



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.
Xenos is offline  
#88 Old 01-16-2013, 11:07 PM
G'day mate
 
gold94corolla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 10,176
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 703 Post(s)
Thanks: 238
Thanked 884 Times in 823 Posts
iTrader Score: 1 reviews
Yeah I'm not comparing this car to anything else, just looking at it fresh.
gold94corolla is offline  
#89 Old 01-16-2013, 11:16 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
So, overall traffic fatalities are down and the number of overall accidents has not changed in any significant amount over the past 23 years. We know this because there is actual data that shows it. But it doesn't matter, drivers today are worse because Vmax says so. lol Whatever.



Follow the logic here. Driver's today are supposedly worse because they are distracted by cell phones and other gadgets. This makes them worse drivers right? Only the number of overall accidents has not gone up at all. Wouldn't that actually make them better drivers? I mean if they are so distracted by their cell phone but there is no significant or measurable increase in car accidents, those distracted drivers must actually be pretty good at multi-tasking. lol Food for thought.



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.

Last edited by Xenos; 01-16-2013 at 11:28 PM.
Xenos is offline  
#90 Old 01-16-2013, 11:18 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: AL
Posts: 2,067
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 151 Post(s)
Thanks: 183
Thanked 290 Times in 207 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by gold94corolla View Post
Yeah I'm not comparing this car to anything else, just looking at it fresh.
Agreed. I've never been a big proponent of the notion that a car model must look the same year after year after year out of some sense of tradition. It's just a car. If it looks good, it looks good. This car looks good.

If the purists are really so worried about keeping the car static then lets demand that Chevy go pack to putting the 150 hp Blue Flame inline 6 motor in the Corvette. While we're at it lets go back to that 1950's era suspension. Maybe an AM radio too. No that would obviously be completely unacceptable. But oh God, get rid of the round tail lamps and it's the end of the world. lol



When this baby hits 88 miles an hour, you're gonna see some serious sh*t.

Last edited by Xenos; 01-16-2013 at 11:24 PM.
Xenos is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Nation Forums > General Discussion

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome