2006 Toyota Sienna

http://www.toyota.com/images/vehicles/2006/sienna/gallery/exterior/large/photo_1.jpg

http://www.toyota.com/images/vehicles/2006/sienna/gallery/exterior/large/photo_2.jpg

http://www.toyota.com/images/vehicles/2006/sienna/gallery/exterior/large/photo_3.jpg

New Power-Folding Outside Mirrors (available on XLE and XLE Limited)
Power-Folding 3rd Row Seat (available on XLE Limited 2WD)
Auxiliary input jack
MP3/WMA capability

http://img388.imageshack.us/img388/3005/sienna12fu.jpg

I don't like it. My Step Dad has an 04 and I like the more agressive front on it. Looks kinda like the Mazda 5 and Civic all in one.

Ew, it looks like a Prius wrapped in a minivan package now. :ugh3:

I like it but as drunken_panda stated, I loved the agressive front-end styling much much more. That was actually the highlight of the Sienna. Now it looks like they went back in time about five years to what the Sienna should have looked like in 2000/2001...all rounded and crap. Bad move Toyota.

On a plus side I LOVE the headlights!

I liked the older styling too, but Id bet the new Sienna gets better gas milage because of how much sleeker it is.
Id take that one over the boxy minivans that GM and Ford are building these days.
Cap'n

Looks like the current Civic front end in the last picture. It looked okay in other pics that I've seen but in these, it seems they tried to make it rounder and well, it's a bit too round.

It reminds me of the new Odessy

New Power-Folding Outside Mirrors? sweet! they are being like JDM lol!

There is no XLE Limited. Just Limited.

CE LE XLE Limited
(2006)

CE LE XLE XLW Limited
(2003.5)

And those wheels make the CE look cheap

There is no XLE Limited. Just Limited.

CE LE XLE Limited
(2006)

CE LE XLE XLW Limited
(2003.5)

And those wheels make the CE look cheap


hahah the CE is cheap! and by making it look so it would make people like you and me want to upgrade! goodness their marketing department is just l33t.

the front looks like a Mazda5 to me

I don't like it that much...the headlights are too big and the front end is awkwardly proportioned. It's a very "safe" looking minivan.

Those headlights are beastly!(As in huge)

And I like it.(As in compared to other minivans on the market)

Well, they better watch out for the 06' Kia Sedona
(How ever you spell it) 240 hp!!!!!!

only 240hp? good luck:D That Sedona is heavy as hell.

You bet, 240 HP

Hmm, but that won't match the Sienna in 0-60 (I know, i know it doesn't matter in a minivan but it does mean that with a full load, it won't be sluggish) or the towing capacity.

hehe

Meh, it looks alright, but it's a minivan.

My stepdad hsa an 04. It is nice. Comfy ride, powerful engine, quite. The interior is flexible. My dad has a 92 Previa. Personally I would pick the Previa. I like the driving position better, it lacks power, but man oh man is it great. I would drive a S/C Alltrac Previa if the gas milage was a little better and I could find one. It has so much character. I am 19 if anyone questions my decision.

the previa was good but it sure wasnt safe.

I like it, though the bumper looks a little too large to me. Still looks better than the Odyssey and Quest, though.

And am I the only one who doesn't see the point in Toyota offering a "Limited" model? The XLE should be enough. I feel this way about the new Avalon, too.

A pic of the "new" rear end. Notice the more circular definitions in the taillights:

http://i.tnpv.us/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945782_pv.jpg

its pretty ugly

Again with the soft image. I liked the old rear because it had angles and looked more agressive. The only mid updates that I have taken issue with is the 3.5 Camry because of the rear and the 2.5 Sienna. And to a lesser degree the 1.5 Tundra.

What is up with Toyota not offering a Tape player on their cars anymore? I don't use it, but now the head unit looks to spartan, almost after thoughtish.

:clap: Is that an LE with rear sensors?Its about time

:clap: Is that an LE with rear sensors?Its about time
And the CE wheel covers off our 04! :lol:

Wooooooow

Hey, I'd hit it. I like that new round contour on the front end. But that's me because I design cars with round bumpers and all. :D

Hey, can you make a body kit for my Camry? 2002 LE
:thanks:

1.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456482a.jpg
2.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456483a.jpg
3.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456484a.jpg
4.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456485a.jpg
5.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456486a.jpg
6.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456487a.jpg
7.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456488a.jpg
8.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456489a.jpg
9.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456490a.jpg
10.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456491a.jpg
11.http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/merismus/gallery/c456494a.jpg

http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/7278520206441507.JPG?0.9160227634513682
http://www.weblogsinc.com/common/images/3621741295227252.JPG?0.3986929678181008
3.8L V6 w/ 244hp, just as much as the Honda Odyssey, but do they really need a really big engine to produce that much horsepower, it is also really heavy. The Odyssey is the fastest, then Sienna, then the Quest. I am not sure about the new Sedona.
The back looks like the Rio

Toyota is making the Sienna look like a Lexus on the Exterior, and on the interior, it looks like a regular Toyota.


Well, except for the new optitron meters, 3rd row power folding seats, power folding mirrors, front and rear obstacle sensors, and the ride. Lexy!

nice sleek headlights, all in all good 'face lift', however it does remind me of the new civic or Mazda5 front design

i
i
i
i
i
http://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946116_pv.jpgiiihttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946084_pv.jpgihttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945846_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946073_pv.jpgYou like?
http://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946095_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946159_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946138_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945815_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945825_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945846_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945804_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090946063_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945889_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945793_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945771_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945739_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945750_pv.jpghttp://us.tnpv.net/2005/WKA200509/WKA2005090945729_pv.jpg

Nice pics, These pics are really nice. Now i like how the 2006 Sienna looks. Toyota and Lexus have bad photo galleries that make the car look boring and not as nice. The front looks smooth and has nice styling.

i think sienna has got very powerful engine.tanx for your pic

Anytime

the Sienna doesnt have a 3.8 L engine.....its 3.3 w/215 hp.

we like the changes here at the dealership, and most of the response has been positive. Of all model changes between 05-06, the Sienna has by far the most.

he was talking about the kia sedona when he said 3.8L V6

The sienna is going to become the slowest Minivan when the new sedona comes out. But, the 2007 year is going to have 270!:eek:

Yeah, but the sedona is freakin heavy!:lol:

Are you kiddn me? The Sienna is the second fastest van (versus 2004 Odyssey). First is the Odyssey and Third is the Quest. (Last i heard) I Think numbers have changed.

2005 Sienna - 8.4 (3.3 V6)
2005 Odyssey - 8.7 (3.5 V6)
2005 Quest - 8.9 (3.5 V6)
2005 Sedona - 9.8 (3.5 V6)
(MotorWeek)

I saw an 06 Sienna on the road (budget car rental. Who knew the had Toyota cars?)

It was in the blue colour shown above in this page. It looked okay in real life and not as comical as we first thought when we saw the pictures. The headlight covers do protude out quite a bit.

Guyz,
don't you ever looked at how curvy women's body are, well some of them. now compare it to the Sienna, now, which one do you like better. Hahaha...I think Toyota were thinking for the women since minivans are basiclly made for women anyways. Women likes curves also. http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/10/10_1_103v.gif (http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb001_ZNxmk121YYUS)

At www.Carpoint.com (http://www.carpoint.com/):
http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/images/spacers/spacer.gif

2004 Sienna(230hp)(The fastest and most powerful)
0 - 60 Time=8.27
1/4 Mile Time=16.608


2005 Honda Odyssey(255hp) (The fastest and most powerful)
http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/images/spacers/spacer.gif0 - 60 Time=8.32
1/4 Mile Time=16.5987

So are those true numbers? The 2006 Sienna and Odyssey are gonna lose some power:

2006 Toyota Sienna:
Front-Wheel Drive Trims
http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/images/spacers/spacer.gif
Engine3.3L 215hp V6Horsepower, 222 @ 3600 RPM222

2006 Honda Odyssey:

http://fp.images.autos.msn.com/images/spacers/spacer.gifLXEXEX-LEX-L=244 hp V6 3.5L, 240lb of torque @ 5000 RPM

The Horsepower Rating has changed and will affect most if not all Japanese Cars.
They are still the same engines from last year unless they got refreshed or redesigned. Even with the new SAE Net HP rating, Toyota and Honda will still be one of the fastest vans.

http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06sienna_xle_05.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24181/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_08.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24180/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06sienna_xle_06.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24179/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_05.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24178/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_07.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24175/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_09.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24171/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06sienna_xle_08.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24170/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06sienna_xle_11.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24167/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_03.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24166/size/big)
http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/data/532/medium/06siennaxlelimited_01.jpg (http://www.tundrasolutions.com/photopost/showphoto.php/photo/24165/size/big)

In other words, the 215 hp Sienna will still get to 60 in 8.3 Seconds.

Does anyone know how they added an AUX in? Is it the same hed unit with a tap in the CD changer port?

In other words, the 215 hp Sienna will still get to 60 in 8.3 Seconds.
Yes, this new standards by no means lowers performance. Technically, you've been getting 215 all along.

Did they kill the rear spolier on 2006 Limited models?

Nice but i still like the estima better and the estima is available in hybrid.