What mpg do you get in your camry? - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
Camry 3rd & 4th Gen (1992-1996 & 1997-2001)/1st Gen Solara (1999-2003) Toyota Camry Discussion for years 1992-1996 & 1997-2001, as well as Solara discussion for years 1999-2003. Topics of discussion range from fuel economy, safety, modifications, performance all involving America's favorite family car, the Toyota Camry.

 3Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 71 Old 09-25-2012, 11:00 PM Thread Starter
New TN User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: North carolina
Posts: 44
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 29
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
What mpg do you get in your camry?

If you could give info like engine and if auto or manual, I would appreciate it.
And any other factors, like if all highway or if you are a hypermiler...that sort of thing.

I'm in the market, and I had wanted a corrolla with stick for the high mpg's that i could easily get...but the wife wants something bigger for trips when she is sitting in the back with the toddler.

I currently have a 97 4runner with 240K miles (thing is a freakin tank) that we use for road trips, that gets about 18mpg mixed driving.

I went to fueleconomy.gov and saw that the camry didnt get much better than about 24mpg mixed driving.

If the difference isnt that much, than I would just as soon get another 4runner and then have even more room and be able to tow and have 4wd, etc....

But, I'm wondering what you guys really get in real life driving.

thx
hotshoe is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 71 Old 09-25-2012, 11:09 PM
ALSO AVAILABLE IN SOBER
 
Zembonez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 7,460
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 242 Post(s)
Thanks: 204
Thanked 849 Times in 691 Posts
Lifetime Supreme Member
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
There have been a million threads discussing fuel economy here. A quick search would probably net you more info that you could ever want.

03 Camry - 09 XB - 07 GMC Sierra - 14 Accord Sport
Zembonez is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Zembonez For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #3 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 02:51 AM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 141
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
I average 35-36 MPG...with my goal of 40 MPG average in sight...all thanks to driving efficiently hypermiling is a stupid term, so is ecodriving.


PM me and I can help you out with many tips and advice!



2001 Toyota Camry 2.2L-I4, automatic transmission with 161,000 miles.
LostSouthernStar is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LostSouthernStar For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012), JDOGG (10-08-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 05:57 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,832
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 311 Times in 294 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
2003 Camry V6 automatic, 152,000 miles. Gets about 30-33 MPG highway, 24-28 MPG in mixed driving, using 87 octane non-ethanol fuel.
93celicaconv is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to 93celicaconv For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #5 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 08:26 AM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 16
Thanked 9 Times in 5 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
2001 Camry

2001 Camry 63K 5SFE, driving 80% local 20% hway, 25.x MPG
MyCamry01 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MyCamry01 For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #6 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 10:16 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Tom 2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mukilteo, WA
Posts: 1,093
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Garage
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
2000 LE 4cyl. 26-27 MPG mixed driving. Can get 33 MPG on interstate.

Tom

2016 RAV4 Limited Hybrid
2000 Camry LE - Lunar Mist Metallic
1987 Nissan 300ZX GLL
Tom 2000 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Tom 2000 For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #7 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 10:20 AM
New Convertible Owner
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 89
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Thanks: 42
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
USA

I just bought a 2000 Solara SLE V6 3.0L about 2 months ago (automatic), and I'm getting around 22mpg in town on 87 octane gas. I get around 25mpg on the highway, but I haven't changed the oil myself yet. I have heard running synthetic oil that it will probably net better gas mileage.
mrstangblb is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to mrstangblb For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #8 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 10:28 AM
TN Post Wh*re
 
Chris Crash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Pluto
Posts: 5,343
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Thanks: 255
Thanked 442 Times in 379 Posts
iTrader Score: 13 reviews
97 Camry 4 cylinder 5 speed gets around 30 MPG, highest I've gotten is 33.

94 Camry V6 5 speed with tons of modifications, including a high flow fuel pump, gets around 17 MPG highway

2016 Toyota Corolla S Plus 6-speed FOR SALE
1997 Toyota Camry LE 5-speed SOLD
1994 Toyota Camry J-Vin CRUSHED
1997 Toyota Camry CE 5-speedCRUSHED
Chris Crash is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Chris Crash For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #9 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 02:10 PM
Noob
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SF
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Wow people here get pretty good mileage. My brother drives the Camry now, maybe 20 miles of freeway + 5 miles of city, and he gets around 29 mpg (+/-1)

Oh, 2.2 Auto, btw, on California gas

1996 Toyota Camry LE 2.2 - 139xxx 162xxx
2000 Toyota Sienna XLE 3.0 - 82xxx 104xxx

08/08 08/11
gladis is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to gladis For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #10 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 04:07 PM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 325 Times in 293 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
'97 Camry 2.2l/auto, city mostly, 25mpg

Some have mentioned octane, octane and MPG are not related, just FYI.

87 octane and 95 octane have the same "energy" per gallon so will result in the same MPG.
Higher octane fuel is less likely to pre-ignite under compression than lower octane.
Higher octane also does not "burn cleaner", another myth.

If your engine doesn't "knock/ping" on regular gas then running with anything else is a waste of money.
RonR is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to RonR For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #11 of 71 Old 09-26-2012, 04:08 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
97 4cyl automatic 130k miles

19-20 city. very short distances, 35-40mph speed limit, and lots of stop lights.

most ive gotten on highway is about 28mpg. not sure if running a 225/45 tire has anything to do with it

Sold: 97 Camry Auto
Current: 2010 Camry XLE Auto
Soon To Be Sold: 2007 BMW 328i 6MT
.Camryman97. is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to .Camryman97. For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #12 of 71 Old 09-27-2012, 06:18 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 2,832
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 311 Times in 294 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonR View Post
Some have mentioned octane, octane and MPG are not related, just FYI.

87 octane and 95 octane have the same "energy" per gallon so will result in the same MPG.

Higher octane fuel is less likely to pre-ignite under compression than lower octane.

If your engine doesn't "knock/ping" on regular gas then running with anything else is a waste of money.
Your first sentence is not true. Your 2nd & 3rd sentences are true. Your 4th sentence may be true.

For older engines that did not yet employ knock sensors, timing is not affected by pre-ignition due to low octane fuel, and as such, these engines are prone to knock on low octane fuel in certain driving situations - and when this happens, your MPG is negatively affected.

More recent engines that employ knock sensors adjust timing when pre-ignition begins, retarding timing to prevent hard knocks. Timing that is retarded from ideal happens a little too late for the engine to gain as much rotational energy from the flame dispersion, so MPG is negatively affected.

Energy content of gasoline is about equal, regardless of octane level, that is true. Getting the engine to convert this energy content into rotational power efficiently is the issue.

I will agree if someone has driving characteristics that would never cause an early engine w/o knock sensors to knock on low octane fuel, or with a newer engine w/knock sensors to retard timing due to pre-ignition, that person would not gain any MPG benefit from a higher octane fuel.

The major question is whether the added cost of the higher octane fuel is justified by having more than enough offset in better MPG, so that the cost of fuel per mile is lower. I personally think MPG is improved slightly with a higher octane fuel, but is not enough to lower the fuel cost per mile to justify it.

Last edited by 93celicaconv; 09-27-2012 at 06:19 AM.
93celicaconv is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to 93celicaconv For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #13 of 71 Old 09-27-2012, 11:25 AM
Senior TN Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,505
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 325 Times in 293 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Quote:
Originally Posted by 93celicaconv View Post
Your first sentence is not true. Your 2nd & 3rd sentences are true. Your 4th sentence may be true.

For older engines that did not yet employ knock sensors, timing is not affected by pre-ignition due to low octane fuel, and as such, these engines are prone to knock on low octane fuel in certain driving situations - and when this happens, your MPG is negatively affected.

More recent engines that employ knock sensors adjust timing when pre-ignition begins, retarding timing to prevent hard knocks. Timing that is retarded from ideal happens a little too late for the engine to gain as much rotational energy from the flame dispersion, so MPG is negatively affected.

Energy content of gasoline is about equal, regardless of octane level, that is true. Getting the engine to convert this energy content into rotational power efficiently is the issue.

I will agree if someone has driving characteristics that would never cause an early engine w/o knock sensors to knock on low octane fuel, or with a newer engine w/knock sensors to retard timing due to pre-ignition, that person would not gain any MPG benefit from a higher octane fuel.

The major question is whether the added cost of the higher octane fuel is justified by having more than enough offset in better MPG, so that the cost of fuel per mile is lower. I personally think MPG is improved slightly with a higher octane fuel, but is not enough to lower the fuel cost per mile to justify it.
Interesting take on that.
If an engine designed to run on 87 octane pings/knocks in any driving situation then, IMO, there is a problem with the engine or the gas itself.
Switch brands of gas, run some Seaform thru the system to try to clean off any carbon build up that might cause hot spots in the cylinders causing pinging/knocking.
If the engine is running hotter than usual, which can cause pinging, get the cooling system checked out.
Engine timing sensors may have issues or CPU.

Running a higher octane fuel might prevent the pinging/knocking but the underlying issue of why there was pinging/knocking using the designated octane level is not dealt with, and could end up being a bigger issue in the future.

So engine issues aside I still think MPG and octane are not related.
i.e. 5SFE engine running well with 87 octane getting 25mpg would get the same 25mpg running 93octane, only change would be in the weight of your wallet

Last edited by RonR; 09-27-2012 at 12:00 PM.
RonR is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to RonR For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #14 of 71 Old 09-27-2012, 02:51 PM
Noob
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SF
Posts: 469
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
You know, I just read through your post, OP, and I just wanted to point out that the jump from 18-24 mpg is pretty big.

Over 18k miles, a car with 18 mpg uses 1000 gallons, while a car with 24 mph uses 750 gallons, that's a difference of 250 gallons, or about $1000 if gas is ~$4/gal.

It's not a HUGE amount, but I think its pretty significant to most people (it is to me, at least).

1996 Toyota Camry LE 2.2 - 139xxx 162xxx
2000 Toyota Sienna XLE 3.0 - 82xxx 104xxx

08/08 08/11
gladis is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to gladis For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
post #15 of 71 Old 09-27-2012, 09:31 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 650
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
are there any other benefits of running a higher octane. ive heard that its good to just occasionally run a premium tank of gas through the engine. like any cleaning benefits? because i know shell always has those commercials of what their premium gas does and stuff. so i was curious if it's any beneficial to a little 5sfe engine like mine?

Sold: 97 Camry Auto
Current: 2010 Camry XLE Auto
Soon To Be Sold: 2007 BMW 328i 6MT
.Camryman97. is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to .Camryman97. For This Useful Post:
hotshoe (10-01-2012)
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Passenger and Sports Car Forums > Camry and Solara Forum > Camry 3rd & 4th Gen (1992-1996 & 1997-2001)/1st Gen Solara (1999-2003)

Bookmarks

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome