RAV4 safety scores - Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums
RAV4 Forum Looking for RAV4 information and resources? This forum is the place.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 5 Old 04-29-2014, 09:11 AM Thread Starter
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: louisiana
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 46 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
RAV4 safety scores

Some food for thought ... I compiled crash test ratings of several budget small SUVs accordingly to three different testing / rating authorities:

IIHS - Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (USA). Depending on crash test results cars can be awarded three ratings:
- Top Safety Pick Plus (TSP+) - highest
- Top Safety Pick
- nothing (Fail)
The rating takes into account 6 criteria:
- moderate overlap front crash test
- small overlap front crash test
- side crash test (simulated side impact by a pick-up / SUV)
- whiplash (rear end crash)
- roof strength
- active crash prevention (including optional equipment)

NHTSA NCAP (US Government) - Cars get a "star" rating that ranges from 1 to 5. Ratings are awarded based on 4 criteria:
- full overlap front crash test
- side crash test (simulated side impact by a pick-up / SUV)
- side crash test into pole / tree
- rollover risk

EuroNCAP - European New Car Assessment Program. Cars are awarded from 1 to 5 "stars", but also a more representative numeric score is published. Results are based on:
- moderate overlap front crash test
- side crash test (simulated crash test by a passenger car)
- side crash into pole / tree
- whiplash (rear end crash)
- VSC performance / safety assist equipment (standard equipment only, optional equipment is not considered)


Here are the results, from best to worse (using average from all three agencies, when available)

Car - model / IIHS score / NHTSA score / EuroNCAP score

Group 1: These are the only three that score top marks with all three agencies
Mazda CX-5 / TSP+ / 5 stars / 94
Mitsubishi Outlander / TSP+ / 5 stars / 94
Subaru Forester / TSP+ / 5 stars / 91

Group 2: These two score well 2-out-of-3
Honda CRV / Fail / 5 stars / 93
Kia Sportage / Fail / 5 stars / 93

Group 3: These ones have at least one good score
Nissan Rogue / TSP+ / 4 stars / not tested
Jeep Cherokee / not tested / 4 stars / 92
Hyundai Tucson / Fail / 4 stars / 90

Group 4:
And here are two that at the bottom of the scale accordingly to all testing agencies:
Toyota RAV4 / Fail / 4 stars / 89
Ford Escape / Fail / 4 stars / not tested

Kind of sad considering that RAV4 is supposed to be a "new" model.
katekebo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 04-30-2014, 02:02 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
Yawn. Knock yourself out and cherry-pick any ratings or stats you like. The RAV in the SUV class is far safer than most. So what if other brands are slightly better within that class.

The SUV as a class of vehicle in general is safer than a 4-door sedan, especially the compacts. A big pick-up truck is safer than an SUV. An 18-wheeler safer than a big pick-up. Train is safer than an 18-wheeler.

Old saying: In a crash, vehicle with the biggest lugnuts wins! Train lugnuts are pretty big, lol.
*

Last edited by krane; 04-30-2014 at 02:08 PM.
krane is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 04-30-2014, 02:16 PM Thread Starter
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: louisiana
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 46 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by krane View Post
The SUV as a class of vehicle in general is safer than a 4-door sedan, especially the compacts.
*
You may be up for a surprise. Insurance statistics show that you are 20% more likely to suffer injuries in an accident in a RAV than "industry average". Given, it's better than the Corolla, which is 55% worse than average, but still above the risk of injuries in an average mid-size sedan. On the other hand, in a Forester, the likelihood of injuries is 34% below industry average. This is based on thousand of insurance claims from real-life accident data over a period of three years ending Dec. 2012.
katekebo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 5 Old 04-30-2014, 05:00 PM
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 300
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 54 Post(s)
Thanks: 36
Thanked 44 Times in 38 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
[QUOTE=katekebo;7036090 Insurance statistics show that you are 20% more likely to suffer injuries in an accident in a RAV than "industry average". [/QUOTE]

There you go cherry-picking stats again, and it just becomes garbage. You completely missed my point: The SUV class is generally safer than the 4-door sedan class, especially as you get bigger. IIHS has posted a recent article on this very topic.

Now if IIHS had the balls to assign a numerical score to each and every vehicle, regardless of class, you would see the RAV (and other SUV models) near the top. Instead, they (you) keep referring to an arbitrary 'class' as though models within this class are competing, and are somehow unsafe! They are not. What is important (to me) is what is 'safe enough.'

To summarize: I could care less if the RAV leads the SUV class because the SUV class in itself leads the way for most of the others. Now, knock yourself out, pull up some more irrelevant factoids, and skew some more data. We'll have to agree to disagree as you apparently have some axe to grind on the RAV.
krane is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 05-08-2014, 09:15 PM Thread Starter
Official TN Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: louisiana
Posts: 444
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 54 Times in 46 Posts
iTrader Score: 0 reviews
(Thread Starter)
Quote:
Originally Posted by krane View Post
There you go cherry-picking stats again, and it just becomes garbage. You completely missed my point: The SUV class is generally safer than the 4-door sedan class, especially as you get bigger. IIHS has posted a recent article on this very topic.

Now if IIHS had the balls to assign a numerical score to each and every vehicle, regardless of class, you would see the RAV (and other SUV models) near the top. Instead, they (you) keep referring to an arbitrary 'class' as though models within this class are competing, and are somehow unsafe! They are not. What is important (to me) is what is 'safe enough.'

To summarize: I could care less if the RAV leads the SUV class because the SUV class in itself leads the way for most of the others. Now, knock yourself out, pull up some more irrelevant factoids, and skew some more data. We'll have to agree to disagree as you apparently have some axe to grind on the RAV.
Yes, it's true the MOST SUVs are safer than sedans.

And IIHS DOES HAVE THE BALLS to compare ALL vehicles regardless of class. It is precisely this score that shows that SUV are safer than sedans. But there is just one small problem. The RAV stands out like a sore thumb with one of the worst scores among SUVs, and about the same as the average score for sedans. RAV score is mediocre and below average regardless of class.

Here are the numbers of serious injuries based on actual accidents over 3 years (2010-2012). "100" index indicates industry average based on ALL accidents reported during that period, and is not adjusted for vehicle type.

The index for 4-door cars, regardless of size, is 120. That means that a person riding a sedan is, on average, 20% more likely to suffer injuries in an accident.

The index for all SUVs is 86. So yes, SUV in general are significantly safer. But the index for RAV is 120, way higher than most other SUVs, and as high as sedans.

It's easy to understand why RAV scores so bad. First, it is among the smallest and lightest SUV. So in a car-to-car accident it doesn't have the weight advantage that a bigger SUV offers. And it is tall and narrow, making it more prone to rollover, increasing the risk of serious injuries.

Bottom line - most SUVs are safer, but RAV isn't one of them.

Last edited by katekebo; 05-09-2014 at 07:50 AM.
katekebo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

  Toyota Nation Forum : Toyota Car and Truck Forums > Toyota Truck, SUV and Van Forums > RAV4 Forum

Bookmarks

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome