Honestly, the 2.0t motor was the best part of the 10th Generation Accord. I've driven the 1.5t and the hybrid powertrains too- but the 2.0t engine is what really makes the Accord a great car. The 1.5t is pretty lackluster and rough sounding (not that the target demographic generally cares). The hybrid is a bit better- but I just don't have faith in Honda's hybrid system being reliable long-term.
I think that styling was one of the major downsides of the 10th Generation Accord... and one of the reasons why customers seemed to prefer the Camry by a large margin. The front-end styling (with the chrome unibrow) wasn't to everyone's liking and the C-shaped taillights weren't everyone's cup of tea. The Camry is much more attractive by comparison. Inside, the Accord seemed significantly better than the current Camry- both in terms of quality and ease of use. The problem though- if the car isn't attractive enough on the outside- buyers aren't ever going to see the inside.
I was extremely disappointed when they announced that the 11th Gen Accord would be dropping the 2.0t engine option. The styling is pretty rough too- but sometimes it's hard to tell from images/videos. Sometimes a car looks very different in person... so I'll reserve my final judgement until I see one in person. Right now though- the new Accord looks like one of those bland cars that they use for insurance advertisements. Although the 10th Generation Accord's design wasn't everyone's cup of tea... at least it wasn't bland.
Lastly, I think that it's pretty ridiculous for MotorTrend (or anyone else) to do a comparison between a brand-new design of the Accord and the Camry- which is likely going to be getting quite the overhaul very soon. The current generation is going on six years... and will almost certainly be overhauled for 2024. The last time I checked, Toyota didn't have any trouble selling Camrys these days... even with a six year-old design.
I think that styling was one of the major downsides of the 10th Generation Accord... and one of the reasons why customers seemed to prefer the Camry by a large margin. The front-end styling (with the chrome unibrow) wasn't to everyone's liking and the C-shaped taillights weren't everyone's cup of tea. The Camry is much more attractive by comparison. Inside, the Accord seemed significantly better than the current Camry- both in terms of quality and ease of use. The problem though- if the car isn't attractive enough on the outside- buyers aren't ever going to see the inside.
I was extremely disappointed when they announced that the 11th Gen Accord would be dropping the 2.0t engine option. The styling is pretty rough too- but sometimes it's hard to tell from images/videos. Sometimes a car looks very different in person... so I'll reserve my final judgement until I see one in person. Right now though- the new Accord looks like one of those bland cars that they use for insurance advertisements. Although the 10th Generation Accord's design wasn't everyone's cup of tea... at least it wasn't bland.
Lastly, I think that it's pretty ridiculous for MotorTrend (or anyone else) to do a comparison between a brand-new design of the Accord and the Camry- which is likely going to be getting quite the overhaul very soon. The current generation is going on six years... and will almost certainly be overhauled for 2024. The last time I checked, Toyota didn't have any trouble selling Camrys these days... even with a six year-old design.