"Mama Bear" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]
> "Ray O" <rokigawaATtristarassociatesDOTcom> wrote :
>
>>
>> "Mama Bear" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>>> quietguy <post[email protected]>
>>> wrote
>>> :
>>>
>>>> Landcruiser, Prado, Kluger - lots of models, all good
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>> Mama Bear wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are there any 4 wheel drive Toyotas? If so, ones that are like the
>>>>> wagons and can get maybe 30 MPG? Reliable?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> - Mama Bear
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> All the 4WD's seem to be under RV's, I don't see anything like the
>>> Corolla wagon in 4WD under cars. In fact I don't see Corolla wagons
>>> at all, at their site. Don't they make them anymore?
>>>
>>> I bet I could still get some money for this '93, it's sweet.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> - Mama Bear
>>
>> If you are in the U.S., go to www.toyota.com and look at the Matrix
>> under cars. The Matrix is available in AWD, (all wheel drive) which
>> is full-time four wheel drive.
>
>
> Does that greatly reduce the gas mileage?
>
> I don't see it under options though.
>
> --
> - Mama Bear
Hmmm... It looks like AWD is discontinued in the Matrix for 2007.
If you look at Edmunds.com and research used cars, an AWD Matrix is
available for 2006 model year and earlier. According to the EPA fuel
mileage estimates, the AWD version gets 2 MPG less in the city, 3 MPG less
on the highway, 3 MPG less combined.
FWD with automatic transmission 28 city, 34 hwy, 31 combined EPA
AWD with automatic transmission 26 city, 31 hwy, 28 combined.
Of course, your mileage may vary, but the relative difference between the
FWD and AWD Matrix should be about right.
--
Ray O
(correct punctuation to reply)