Is 7.2 seconds 0-60 not enough for you? Thats pretty damn good for a 2.4L 4cyl...
Neither am I. $3500 plus tax.... that's roughly $100 per 1 horsepower. And you lose out on 12 months of warranty if you installed the thing yourself. The labor rates for installing the thing at the dealership is ridiculous (warranty of the thing stays intact if you install it through the dealer). I got quoted $175/hr at around 8-9hrs installation time with an additional $100 storage fee for overnight storing due to length of install (here at Burlingame Putnam Toyota). The sad thing is, for about $20,000+ (which is what the car would be estimated to be with the s/c not installed), there are other cars at that price range with more horsepower and better performance STOCK. There's only so much you can do to a 4-cylinder engine. If it's horses you want, might as well just get a V6 or V8. It's cheaper than constantly modifying your car with add-ons. In this case, no matter what you do to your car, there will ALWAYS be a car faster than yours while in the meantime, the Highway Patrol is always waiting right around the corner.kenratboy said:Link:
To be honest, I was under the impression the 0-60 time was in the mid 6-second range. I am sure it kicks ass and all, but I am not that impressed.
I know. We all know that a stock tC without any add-ons is about 16K. $20K includes the stock tC and the supercharger alone NOT including the installation of the s/c. We were mainly referencing the car that was reviewed in the article. After reading the article about their testing of this supercharged tC, "their" tC that they tested with the s/c was about $26K according to the article and it's about $23K with just the s/c and few add-ons like the overpriced 18" rims (I guess that includes all the installation and what not that you're bound to have to pay for if you install it through the dealership without nulling the 12month warranty as the article states). I just don't think spending $23K-$26K on a package like the one edmunds tested is worth it. Like the last person stated, around $27K, you might as well just get an Evo or a nice V6 '06 Eclipse GT that has some pretty nice numbers for performance. Just my opinion that's all.white3ch0c0late said:^What are you guys talking about!?!? The car is $16000 without the supercharger!!!
Well, I dunno... look at Tony The Tiger... he dynoed his custom turbo Camry out at 394HP to the wheels.... he's destroying Evo's, from what I've been hearing. He put in $10,000+ in the engine alone. And its very admirable. I wouldn't want a car that comes built for performance or crap like that. I think the high road is when you take a regular car that seemingly has little potential, and turn it into a monster. In all honesty, I have absolutely zero desire to get an Evo or an STi. Absolutely none. There's no personal satisfaction there for me. I'm planning a big project for my Camry sometime in the not-too-distant future thats going to boost my numbers like crazy, and I'll be destroying Si's, even with my 4-speed auto. Its my little secret, but its in planning.vespa5 said:I know. We all know that a stock tC without any add-ons is about 16K. $20K includes the stock tC and the supercharger alone NOT including the installation of the s/c. We were mainly referencing the car that was reviewed in the article. After reading the article about their testing of this supercharged tC, "their" tC that they tested with the s/c was about $26K according to the article and it's about $23K with just the s/c and few add-ons like the overpriced 18" rims (I guess that includes all the installation and what not that you're bound to have to pay for if you install it through the dealership without nulling the 12month warranty as the article states). I just don't think spending $23K-$26K on a package like the one edmunds tested is worth it. Like the last person stated, around $27K, you might as well just get an Evo or a nice V6 '06 Eclipse GT that has some pretty nice numbers for performance. Just my opinion that's all.