Toyota Nation Forum banner
3721 - 3740 of 3781 Posts

· Banned
Joined
·
270 Posts

· Registered
Rolla DX
Joined
·
478 Posts
What's crazy, as awesome as that sounds...that's still a 7-8 second 0-60 time BUT I bet that car is a beast on a rolling pull or around a track. I'd love to see the dyno plot of that thing.
I’m sure it’ll get better than a 7sec 0-60 with a 3k clutch dump launch and sticky tires. Unfortunately there’s zero info or comments on the video I’m guessing he’s gotta be running some very bumpy cams with little bottom end drivability. This guy recently hit huge numbers on his 10k rpm 4age and posted the dyno along with graph
 

· Administrator
マズダスピード3
Joined
·
18,990 Posts
I’m sure it’ll get better than a 7sec 0-60 with a 3k clutch dump launch and sticky tires. Unfortunately there’s zero info or comments on the video I’m guessing he’s gotta be running some very bumpy cams with little bottom end drivability. This guy recently hit huge numbers on his 10k rpm 4age and posted the dyno along with graph
More like a 2.2 displacement if this is a newer 4age. If it’s the big port 4age, probably stroked it to 1.9.
 

· Registered
Rolla DX
Joined
·
478 Posts
More like a 2.2 displacement if this is a newer 4age. If it’s the big port 4age, probably stroked it to 1.9.
That’s the best part! Still a tiny 1.6 putting down those numbers out of such an old engine is unbelievable. His build specs are in the bio mostly head work cams and slightly oversized pistons on top of reliability mods but in total 1627cc of displacement
 

· Token Aussie
1998 AE102 sedan, 2006 ZZE122 wagon, 2018 ZRE182 hatch
Joined
·
2,673 Posts
More like a 2.2 displacement if this is a newer 4age. If it’s the big port 4age, probably stroked it to 1.9.
Why would a newer-gen 4AGE make a difference? They all share the same bore and stroke (and the same limitations in over-boring), the only difference is that the early bigports had smaller big/small-ends (40/18 vs 42/20). All versions of the 4A/7A are limited to about 83mm bore, so combined with a 7A crank that's 1.9L. I've seen mention of frankenstein builds with 1ZZ cranks but they almost never seem to physically materialise, and even then you end up at 2.0L. Unless they've gone something completely different/unique, there's no way you'd get a 4A-based engine close to 2.2L
 

· Administrator
マズダスピード3
Joined
·
18,990 Posts
Why would a newer-gen 4AGE make a difference? They all share the same bore and stroke (and the same limitations in over-boring), the only difference is that the early bigports had smaller big/small-ends (40/18 vs 42/20). All versions of the 4A/7A are limited to about 83mm bore, so combined with a 7A crank that's 1.9L. I've seen mention of frankenstein builds with 1ZZ cranks but they almost never seem to physically materialise, and even then you end up at 2.0L. Unless they've gone something completely different/unique, there's no way you'd get a 4A-based engine close to 2.2L
The silver, black and blue tops aren’t 2.0 or larger? I was under the impression that the 2.0 would have enough cylinder wall clearances to allow for stroking. Guess I’m wrong there.
 

· Token Aussie
1998 AE102 sedan, 2006 ZZE122 wagon, 2018 ZRE182 hatch
Joined
·
2,673 Posts
The silver, black and blue tops aren’t 2.0 or larger? I was under the impression that the 2.0 would have enough cylinder wall clearances to allow for stroking. Guess I’m wrong there.
Every 4A (regardless of whether it is a 4AC, 4AFC, 4AFE, 4AGE or 4AGE 20V) is 1587cc, all with the same bore and stroke. Hell, the smallport, silvertop and blacktop 4AGEs all share the exact same crank (and the blocks are fundamentally the same too), it is only the head design and the rods/pistons that change over the years.

And a "bluetop" is a early bigport. It goes bluetop (3-rib block bigport, smaller crank/piston journals, 3-rib block), black&redtop (7-rib block bigport), redtop (smallport), silvertop (20V), blacktop (20V)
 

· Token Aussie
1998 AE102 sedan, 2006 ZZE122 wagon, 2018 ZRE182 hatch
Joined
·
2,673 Posts
I was under the impression that the 2.0 would have enough cylinder wall clearances to allow for stroking. Guess I’m wrong there.
Also, cylinder wall thickness has nothing to do with stroking - that is all down to the crank (either by installing a longer throw crank or by offset-grinding the rod pin). Wall thickness is relevant for boring. Generally you can only go a few mm over-size on bore but much more on stroke (as long as you then install pistons with a shorter crown height so you don't smash the valves/head, and clearance the bottom skirt of the bores so the conrods don't hit at half-stroke)
 
3721 - 3740 of 3781 Posts
Top