Not sure. need time to think.
Nice legs!! :naughty: :lol:DCM said:How about this concept car a friend of mine built? Check out the specs on it.
http://horsepowersports.com/fuel-vapor-technology-3-wheels-180hp-92mpg/
The car:
![]()
I think it would be nice too, except it's a sort of contradiction in terms. RWD means more weight from a driveshaft, support bearing, rear axle assembly, etc.Three words: lighter, faster, cheaper.
More RWD small cars would be nice too.
Not really, cars like the AE86 or early Miata barely tipped one tonne. Back in the '70s you could get stripper British or Japanese cars with RWD that were even down to like 1700 lbs - granted they were tin cans and were UTTERLY spartan in that spec. But it's not impossible. Or you can always put the engine in the back.DCM said:I think it would be nice too, except it's a sort of contradiction in terms. RWD means more weight from a driveshaft, support bearing, rear axle assembly, etc.