Toyota Nation Forum banner

1 - 20 of 34 Posts
G

·
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
"Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> YO SCOTT wha' happen?
>
> Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
>


You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field goal
"offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle. Yeah, the foreskins won this
one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl at home on TV
just like Tampa Bay.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Truckdude, 1/9/2006,4:24:22 AM, wrote:

>
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > YO SCOTT wha' happen?
> >
> > Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
> >

>
> You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field
> goal "offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle. Yeah, the foreskins
> won this one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl
> at home on TV just like Tampa Bay.


As we say in golf, "There are no pictures on the scorecard." If you
can win with Defense, it's still a win. I'll bet if the score had been
31-28 someone would have said "you better hope the Defense shows up the
next game."

The Redskins have shown they have Offense and Defense. All their
offensive star players were hurt last game and they still managed to
eke out a win. You never know what will happen during the game.
Coaching and other role players make up the difference when the stars
are down.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > YO SCOTT wha' happen?
> >
> > Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
> >

>
> You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field goal
> "offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle.


What? You better check the score again, skipper. There was a lot more
than one field goal involved.

You do know this is American Football, and not horseshoes, right?

>Yeah, the foreskins won this
> one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl at home on TV
> just like Tampa Bay.


Prove it.

Besides I'm just happy we (true-blue Redskins fans) got the wildcard
and made it into the playoffs. A victory at the superbowl this year is
not necessarily required.... the air is really good in Washington
nowadays. Good karma for liberals and non-republicans at every corner.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
badgolferman wrote:
> Truckdude, 1/9/2006,4:24:22 AM, wrote:
>
> >
> > "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]
> > > YO SCOTT wha' happen?
> > >
> > > Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
> > >

> >
> > You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field
> > goal "offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle. Yeah, the foreskins
> > won this one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl
> > at home on TV just like Tampa Bay.

>
> As we say in golf, "There are no pictures on the scorecard." If you
> can win with Defense, it's still a win. I'll bet if the score had been
> 31-28 someone would have said "you better hope the Defense shows up the
> next game."
>
> The Redskins have shown they have Offense and Defense. All their
> offensive star players were hurt last game and they still managed to
> eke out a win. You never know what will happen during the game.
> Coaching and other role players make up the difference when the stars
> are down.


GO JOE GIBBS
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Learning Richard, 1/9/2006,6:28:55 PM, wrote:

> Good karma for liberals and non-republicans at every corner.


This is wishful thinking on your case.

Let's just agree on the Redskins and Joe Gibbs making a difference for
us.

--
Politicians, like diapers, have to be changed frequently - and for the
very same reason.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
"Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>
> Truckdude wrote:
>> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > YO SCOTT wha' happen?
>> >
>> > Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
>> >

>>
>> You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field
>> goal
>> "offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle.

>
> What? You better check the score again, skipper. There was a lot more
> than one field goal involved.


You'd better learn the difference between offensive and defensive points,
skipper.

>
> You do know this is American Football, and not horseshoes, right?


Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your defense
scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.

>
>>Yeah, the foreskins won this
>> one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl at home on TV
>> just like Tampa Bay.

>
> Prove it.


Nah, I'm just giving you crap there. We will have to watch the game this
weekend and see. The only sure thing is that your offense will have to
score more than one field goal. It is unlikely that Seattle will make a
bunch of mistakes so that your defense can score all the points.

>
> Besides I'm just happy we (true-blue Redskins fans) got the wildcard
> and made it into the playoffs. A victory at the superbowl this year is
> not necessarily required.... the air is really good in Washington
> nowadays. Good karma for liberals and non-republicans at every corner.
>
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your
> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.


Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
will be counted as an offensive touchdown.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> >
> > Truckdude wrote:
> >> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]
> >> > YO SCOTT wha' happen?
> >> >
> >> > Too much of your pee-pee in the gulf pollute the water?
> >> >
> >>
> >> You had better pray to the turnover gods again because that one field
> >> goal
> >> "offense" ain't gonna cut it up in Seattle.

> >
> > What? You better check the score again, skipper. There was a lot more
> > than one field goal involved.

>
> You'd better learn the difference between offensive and defensive points,
> skipper.


Doesn't matter. When I see the scoreboard I don't give a damn where
the points came from as long as WE WIN.

>
> >
> > You do know this is American Football, and not horseshoes, right?

>
> Did you even watch the game??


What does that have to do with hand grenades?

> Your offense scored 3 points and your defense
> scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.


"My" offense did what they had to do. We won the game, and our QB
survived happy and healthy to play another week. No need to squander
too much of our investment now is there? I can assure you that we held
our offense back after we saw what a trouncing our 'D' was giving Tampa
Bay.

>
> >
> >>Yeah, the foreskins won this
> >> one, but we both know they will be watching the Super Bowl at home on TV
> >> just like Tampa Bay.

> >
> > Prove it.

>
> Nah, I'm just giving you crap there. We will have to watch the game this
> weekend and see. The only sure thing is that your offense will have to
> score more than one field goal. It is unlikely that Seattle will make a
> bunch of mistakes so that your defense can score all the points.


We can rattle Seattle.

I don't know if you noticed, but the Redskins are LONG on HEART this
year.

GO JOE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #10 ·
"badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your
>> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.

>
> Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
> return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
> will be counted as an offensive touchdown.


Yeah, technically you are right.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your
> >> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.

> >
> > Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
> > return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
> > will be counted as an offensive touchdown.

>
> Yeah, technically you are right.


The Redskins' victory wasn't technical. The Bucs had a chance and they
got severely dissed in their own front yard.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
"Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>
> Truckdude wrote:
>> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <KbHwf.[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your
>> >> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.
>> >
>> > Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
>> > return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
>> > will be counted as an offensive touchdown.

>>
>> Yeah, technically you are right.

>
> The Redskins' victory wasn't technical. The Bucs had a chance and they
> got severely dissed in their own front yard.
>


Who said the victory was technical?? Badgolferman and I are referring to
one play. LR, I am starting to see the repubs point of view when it comes to
you. You don't know what the hell you are talking about. "Severely
dissed"? The Bucs stepped on their own wienies. You should be breathing a
sigh of relief at the win like your fellow ******* fans. Without TB
screw-ups, it would have been a 10 to 3 ******* loss.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> >
> > Truckdude wrote:
> >> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]
> >> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and your
> >> >> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.
> >> >
> >> > Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
> >> > return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
> >> > will be counted as an offensive touchdown.
> >>
> >> Yeah, technically you are right.

> >
> > The Redskins' victory wasn't technical. The Bucs had a chance and they
> > got severely dissed in their own front yard.
> >

>
> Who said the victory was technical??


Did I say you were technically right? No.

> Badgolferman and I are referring to
> one play.


I'm referring to one game.

> LR, I am starting to see the repubs point of view when it comes to
> you.


Good for you. You don't seem to stand very strong for anything anyway.
No biggie.

> You don't know what the hell you are talking about. "Severely
> dissed"?


I'd say getting beat in a playoff game on your own turf because you
throw an interception with under two minutes in the game is being
"severely dissed". Maybe in Antarctica or wherever the hell you're
from, its not.

> The Bucs stepped on their own wienies. You should be breathing a
> sigh of relief at the win like your fellow ******* fans. Without TB
> screw-ups, it would have been a 10 to 3 ******* loss.


Whatever dude. Redskins won. You're a fuckhead.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> >
> > Truckdude wrote:
> >> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]
> >> >
> >> > Truckdude wrote:
> >> >> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> >> news:[email protected]
> >> >> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006, 12:00:26 AM, <[email protected]>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Did you even watch the game?? Your offense scored 3 points and
> >> >> >> your
> >> >> >> defense scored 14 on an interception and a TB fumble recovery.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Offense scored a touchdown. The first touchdown was an interception
> >> >> > return intside the 10-yard-line. Yes, I know I'm nitpicking but it
> >> >> > will be counted as an offensive touchdown.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, technically you are right.
> >> >
> >> > The Redskins' victory wasn't technical. The Bucs had a chance and they
> >> > got severely dissed in their own front yard.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Who said the victory was technical??

> >
> > Did I say you were technically right? No.
> >
> >> Badgolferman and I are referring to
> >> one play.

> >
> > I'm referring to one game.
> >
> >> LR, I am starting to see the repubs point of view when it comes to
> >> you.

> >
> > Good for you. You don't seem to stand very strong for anything anyway.
> > No biggie.
> >
> >> You don't know what the hell you are talking about. "Severely
> >> dissed"?

> >
> > I'd say getting beat in a playoff game on your own turf because you
> > throw an interception with under two minutes in the game is being
> > "severely dissed". Maybe in Antarctica or wherever the hell you're
> > from, its not.
> >
> >> The Bucs stepped on their own wienies. You should be breathing a
> >> sigh of relief at the win like your fellow ******* fans. Without TB
> >> screw-ups, it would have been a 10 to 3 ******* loss.

> >
> > Whatever dude. Redskins won. You're a fuckhead.
> >

>
> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs have
> sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!


That doesn't make you any less of a fuckhead.

HTH
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
Truckdude, 1/10/2006,7:06:06 PM, wrote:

> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs
> have sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!


You willing to trade? At least Richard has a stronger vocabulary and
likes the Redskins.

--
"Any political party that includes the word 'democratic' in its name,
isn't." ~ Patrick Murray
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
"badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> Truckdude, 1/10/2006,7:06:06 PM, wrote:
>
>> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs
>> have sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!

>
> You willing to trade? At least Richard has a stronger vocabulary and
> likes the Redskins.
>


Liking the 'skins is a minus, not a plus. OTOH, he does seem to be
knowledgeable on a myriad of subjects, albeit in an ADD sort of way. It
sure beats sharx35's one track mind! lol I guess we will have to keep
him.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006,7:06:06 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs
> >> have sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!

> >
> > You willing to trade? At least Richard has a stronger vocabulary and
> > likes the Redskins.
> >

>
> Liking the 'skins is a minus, not a plus. OTOH, he does seem to be
> knowledgeable on a myriad of subjects, albeit in an ADD sort of way.


does it bother you that I'm not a slimy backslider, as you've
demonstrated you are?
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
"Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>
> Truckdude wrote:
>> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006,7:06:06 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs
>> >> have sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!
>> >
>> > You willing to trade? At least Richard has a stronger vocabulary and
>> > likes the Redskins.
>> >

>>
>> Liking the 'skins is a minus, not a plus. OTOH, he does seem to be
>> knowledgeable on a myriad of subjects, albeit in an ADD sort of way.

>
> does it bother you that I'm not a slimy backslider, as you've
> demonstrated you are?
>


Slimy backslider? If that is so, then you should be able to name an issue I
have flip-flopped on.
 
G

·
Discussion Starter · #19 ·
Truckdude wrote:
> "Learning Richard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> >
> > Truckdude wrote:
> >> "badgolferman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]
> >> > Truckdude, 1/10/2006,7:06:06 PM, wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> At least you are good for evening up the moron tally. The repubs
> >> >> have sharx35 and we dems have you...it's a toss-up!! lol!
> >> >
> >> > You willing to trade? At least Richard has a stronger vocabulary and
> >> > likes the Redskins.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Liking the 'skins is a minus, not a plus. OTOH, he does seem to be
> >> knowledgeable on a myriad of subjects, albeit in an ADD sort of way.

> >
> > does it bother you that I'm not a slimy backslider, as you've
> > demonstrated you are?
> >

>
> Slimy backslider? If that is so, then you should be able to name an issue I
> have flip-flopped on.


Why should I waste my time? You know what you're about. I've seen the
kissy kissy threads btw you and the whiteboy neocons around here.
 
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
Top