Toyota Nation Forum banner

1 - 20 of 144 Posts
S

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:18:42 -0600, dbu <[email protected]> wrote:

>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html


Isn't that the woman that had her husband pardon terrorists?


--

Scott in Florida

'Let every nation know, whether it
wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden,
meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe to assure the survival
and the success of liberty.'

John F. Kennedy
 
S

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #4
Re: OT: The bag lady

On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html

>
>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?


Newt Gingrich?


--

Scott in Florida

'Let every nation know, whether it
wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden,
meet any hardship, support any friend,
oppose any foe to assure the survival
and the success of liberty.'

John F. Kennedy
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
In article <[email protected]>,
Scott in Florida <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:18:42 -0600, dbu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html

>
> Isn't that the woman that had her husband pardon terrorists?


And she pardoned him, LOL


>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>
> 'Let every nation know, whether it
> wishes us well or ill, that we shall
> pay any price, bear any burden,
> meet any hardship, support any friend,
> oppose any foe to assure the survival
> and the success of liberty.'
>
> John F. Kennedy

--
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #6
Re: OT: The bag lady

In article <[email protected]>,
Scott in Florida <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html

> >
> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?

>
> Newt Gingrich?


I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.

>
>
> --
>
> Scott in Florida
>
> 'Let every nation know, whether it
> wishes us well or ill, that we shall
> pay any price, bear any burden,
> meet any hardship, support any friend,
> oppose any foe to assure the survival
> and the success of liberty.'
>
> John F. Kennedy

--
 
M

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Re: OT: The bag lady

dbu wrote:

> I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.


Normal people would have to be dosed with GHB to vote for that complete
shithead.
 
J

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #9
Re: OT: The bag lady

"dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Scott in Florida <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> ><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
>> >
>> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?

>>
>> Newt Gingrich?

>
> I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
>



I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?

I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the way
things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a bit
harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a clear
speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.

Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics problem
lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is problematic
enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems haven't
an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
Re: OT: The bag lady

In article <[email protected]>,
"Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > Scott in Florida <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> >> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
> >> >
> >> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
> >>
> >> Newt Gingrich?

> >
> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
> >

>
>
> I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
> run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?
>
> I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the way
> things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a bit
> harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a clear
> speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
> without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
> dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.
>
> Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics problem
> lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
> detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is problematic
> enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems haven't
> an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.


I think both of those guys are political street knife fighters, perhaps
on the same level with hillary.
--
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #12
Re: OT: The bag lady

In article <[email protected]>,
"MaceFace" <[email protected]> wrote:

> dbu wrote:
>
> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.

>
> Normal people would have to be dosed with GHB to vote for that complete
> shithead.


"shithead", that's what makes him so attractive to vote for. We need
shitheads to deal with the terrorists and dimmies.
--
 
M

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #13
Re: OT: The bag lady

"dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message


> "shithead", that's what makes him so attractive to vote for. We need
> shitheads to deal with the terrorists and dimmies.
> --

Too late.....we've already got several of them, and they're lame ducks,
gratefully.

I can't believe you really said that (above).

Did you vote for GWB knowing that he was a shithead?
 
J

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #14
Re: OT: The bag lady

"dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > In article <[email protected]>,
>> > Scott in Florida <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> >> ><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
>> >> >
>> >> >If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >> >for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
>> >>
>> >> Newt Gingrich?
>> >
>> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.
>> >

>>
>>
>> I like Newt too, but I can't help but wonder if he has baggage. Wasn't he
>> run out of Dodge (sic) on a rail?
>>
>> I watch both Newt and Dick Morris, and they have an uncanny grasp on the
>> way
>> things really are. Dick has a bad view of Hillary, and his cynicism is a
>> bit
>> harsh towards her (and he's not running, so it's moot), and Newt is a
>> clear
>> speaker when he bothers to weigh in, and I find that he makes his points
>> without directly slamming anybody -- which is what I wanted to convey by
>> dragging Dick Morris into the discussion.
>>
>> Having said all of that, I thought that Newt had some kind of ethics
>> problem
>> lurking in his background. I don't recall that what I can't remember in
>> detail was particularly problematic for me, it seems that it is
>> problematic
>> enough that the Dems will leverage it to the hilt -- as if the Dems
>> haven't
>> an ethics violation ever in the history of mankind.

>
> I think both of those guys are political street knife fighters, perhaps
> on the same level with hillary.
> --
>


Maybe. But Newt has more experience than Hill, and makes a far better
argument about what the target of the knife should be.
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #15
Re: OT: The bag lady

In article <[email protected]>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "Scott in Florida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> >><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
> >>
> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?

> >
> > Newt Gingrich?

>
> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?


Morally unqualified?
--
 
J

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #16
Re: OT: The bag lady

"dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "Scott in Florida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> >><nspam-8F9972.1218422501200[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
>> >>
>> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
>> >
>> > Newt Gingrich?

>>
>> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?

>
> Morally unqualified?
> --
>


Morally unqualified, like Clinton?

I think that moral fiber is a valid campaign issue. We made it an issue
against Kerry, so I see no reason it can't be used against Newt. Will Newt
be able to deflect the issue? I don't know. But it will certainly be an
issue that comes up at least once.
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #17
Re: OT: The bag lady

In article <[email protected]>,
"JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> "Scott in Florida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]
> >> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
> >> >><[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
> >> >>
> >> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
> >> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
> >> >
> >> > Newt Gingrich?
> >>
> >> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?

> >
> > Morally unqualified?
> > --
> >

>
> Right. Exactly like Clinton. Do you remember that Newt had the biggest mouth
> in terms of tormenting Clinton, and then all of a sudden, he just shut right
> up and never said another word about the blowjob? If not, you should review
> his history. He had skeletons in the closet.


Newt is well spoken, an attack dog no less. He would be a good match
for hillary who is also an attack dog. It would almost be like those
rooster fights, bloody.
--
 
J

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
Re: OT: The bag lady

"dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> "dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]
>> > In article <[email protected]>,
>> > "JoeSpareBedroom" <dish[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Scott in Florida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]
>> >> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>> >> >><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>> >> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
>> >> >
>> >> > Newt Gingrich?
>> >>
>> >> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?
>> >
>> > Morally unqualified?
>> > --
>> >

>>
>> Right. Exactly like Clinton. Do you remember that Newt had the biggest
>> mouth
>> in terms of tormenting Clinton, and then all of a sudden, he just shut
>> right
>> up and never said another word about the blowjob? If not, you should
>> review
>> his history. He had skeletons in the closet.

>
> Newt is well spoken, an attack dog no less. He would be a good match
> for hillary who is also an attack dog. It would almost be like those
> rooster fights, bloody.
> --
>


If Bill Clinton is not morally qualified to be president, neither is Newt.
Sorry. No double standards allowed.
 
J

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #19
Re: OT: The bag lady

"Jeff Strickland" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]
>
> "dbu" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> "Scott in Florida" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>>> news:[email protected]
>>> > On 25 Jan 2007 18:26:01 GMT, "badgolferman"
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>dbu, 1/25/2007, 1:18:42 PM,
>>> >><[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1582130,00.html
>>> >>
>>> >>If those two end up being the candidates I would certainly be voting
>>> >>for a write-in. Can I have another choice please?
>>> >
>>> > Newt Gingrich?
>>>
>>> No! He cheated on his wife, remember?

>>
>> Morally unqualified?
>> --
>>

>
> Morally unqualified, like Clinton?



Exactly right. Clinton was unqualified. Fake Kristians told me so (dbu, golf
boy, etc). No double standards.
 
D

·
Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Discussion Starter #20
Re: OT: The bag lady

dbu wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> "MaceFace" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> dbu wrote:
>>
>> > I think I could be enticed to vote for Newt.

>>
>> Normal people would have to be dosed with GHB to vote for that complete
>> shithead.

>
>"shithead", that's what makes him so attractive to vote for. We need
>shitheads to deal with the terrorists and dimmies.


Idiot.
 
1 - 20 of 144 Posts
Top