Toyota Nation Forum banner
1 - 12 of 12 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
364 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I was just driving my aunt's 94-95 (can't remember exact year) accord today and i noticed that i could take a turn a lot better than i was ever able to with my 93 camry. at the same speeds, the accord was able to turn tighter without that... 'too quick' turning feel. both cars are stock. so i was just wondering if the difference was due to the suspensions of both cars? as well how do stock accord's suspensions compare to that of stock camry suspensions? thanks.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
396 Posts
Honda's just handle better. Sorry Toyota guys, but it's true. Although I do think that Toyota is the better car maker. I have two Accord's, a 94 and a 98 and one Camry, a 95, the Camry is wallowy, but it's supposed to be a more luxury sedan than the sportier Accord. Then I have a Subaru Legacy, and boy, does that blow both the Accords and the Camry out of the water.
 

· Zoom-Zoom
2008 Mazdaspeed 3/2012 Ford Escape
Joined
·
4,852 Posts
^--especially with the Mazda MP3 Protoge, that thing was out running Porsches in the slalom..:eek:


i've always seen the Accord as the sportier of the two...

it's only natural that it'd handle the turns better too..
 

· Know God. Work Hard.
4Runner
Joined
·
2,231 Posts
I think its the difference in weight. If Im not mistaken, the Cam is a lot heavier than the accord?
 

· Banned
Joined
·
4,370 Posts
I like what was in my '99 protege. That, being macphearson setup. $150 rear sway bar and you can out auto-x jsut about any other sub compact that hasn't had major work done with a descent set of tires.

If I wouldn't have killed that car I would have the lex tho!
 
1 - 12 of 12 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top