What is Better?
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Joined
·
5,005 Posts
do you like apples or oranges???.....MR2 is way better.....i'm just kidding...both cars have potential for anything.....just depends on what you like...
yea, both have many parts available. id take the MR2 personally cause i like the body styling more. and cause its a toyota =)
:smokin: Hey this is a Toyota forum YO! :smokin:
What do you expect us to recommend.
Do a search for 'Hyde' here on the message boards. I think that will make up your mind.
any engine on stock internals that takes that much punishment for that long should be a sure sell
What do you expect us to recommend.
Do a search for 'Hyde' here on the message boards. I think that will make up your mind.
any engine on stock internals that takes that much punishment for that long should be a sure sell
i'd pick the gsx if you're looking for cheap horsepower.
Mr2's cost mulah anywhere near and above 300 whp.
I went the mr2 route, but it's costing more. It comes down to money available and what you like. If you want to save money, get an eclipse
Mr2's cost mulah anywhere near and above 300 whp.
I went the mr2 route, but it's costing more. It comes down to money available and what you like. If you want to save money, get an eclipse
Justbe wary if you do decide to go with any eclipse between 1990 and 1999
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/walkingcrankshaft.htm
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/walkingcrankshaft.htm
there is too much hype put on crankwalk on dsms imo....
honestly either way you're looking at a money pit.
Get a regular car, or a NA mr2/NA eclipse. It may not be as fast, but you'll thank me in the long run. Trust me....
Get a regular car, or a NA mr2/NA eclipse. It may not be as fast, but you'll thank me in the long run. Trust me....
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
