i see ricer mustangs around here in tennessee everywhere. there mostly 5.0s tho. the new mustang i think looks stupid. the new "retro" trend im not much for either :disappoin

 

Yayayaya APC represent......lol .....i dont mind the new mustang but i cant stand the new back lights some plz take a bat to them.....

 

i think its trying too hard to look like Eleanor

 

They're okay. Then again I am not a huge fan of Fords in general. I prefer the new Corvette. :naughty:

 

Took a ride in the GT and it was pretty weak for a car that advertised 300/320. :thumbdown

 

yeah that kit makes me less of a fan of the car, but thats not even that extreme of a kit, just wait till they make a blitz and a blackwidow and all the other kits they whore out for the mustang :disappoin

 

you can rice it out sooooo much more on Need For Speed Underground 2 :thumbup: :disappoin

 

It needs a huge carbonfiber wing, altezzas, and decals. :ugh3:

 

Big APC sticker on front so everyone knows you're serious: Priceless.

 

i don't see anything ricey on that red one.....a friend of mine just got his 05 too....they look much nicer in real life than they do in pics...i can't wait til they finish the turbo kit for it.....

 

I'm with Q, the new stangs look very decent.. but the supposedly future Camaro looks nicer IMO. (also a retro-looking car)

Aside from the APC sticker, that stang looks pretty good.. almost reminiscent of the older DECH mustangs.

 

I don't see anything wrong with that mustang, well yeah the sticker needs to go. I like the retro look of it.

 

Aside from the APC sticker, that stang looks pretty good.. almost reminiscent of the older DECH mustangs.

I'll show YOU where APC stickers belong:

 

They're okay. Then again I am not a huge fan of Fords in general. I prefer the new Corvette. :naughty:

Corvette sits back seat to a car that costs $30k less : (Motor Trend comparison)


MRQ: They already have TT kits in production They just don't have any major sales outlets. They already have those things pushing 9's


Razo, That's hardly rice. You just dislike Fords. Even though a stock GT could smoke anything you coould ever do. Just more proof of your jealousy

 

nah, Mike..

the fastest car i ever rode in was a 5.0...

my family used to have 3 Fords, and they were built top notch, and never gave problems..

a stock GT, CANNOT beat a stock 2005 6.0L Pontiac GTO, so i dont know why you're saying that they'll beat anything else stock...

and i know you'll come back and say, "well, the GT is cheaper", like always...

and the fact is, that car is ugly..

yes, it's retro, but after the inital hype, it's already old...

PT Cruiser, Thunderbird, Chevy SSR, Mini Cooper, etc...

all of these cars had hype for a few months, and now they're all lost with the other retro cars...

and the mustang's next..

Mike = wned:

 

^
I said you could built. Not GM dropping the LS2 in yet another car

They need to stop that already. Build a different engine for god sake!

 

this coming from a car that was built on the Fox platform for 25 years..? :disappoin

not only that, but THIS one's based on an aging platform TOO (Lincoln LS )

 

^
I said you could built. Not GM dropping the LS2 in yet another car

They need to stop that already. Build a different engine for god sake!

Are you on crack?

Ford is the worst offender of cross platform parts-bin pilfering ever. The GT40 uses a steering column out of a fucking Focus! The original Mustang was built on the chassis and used every single mechanical part (including drivetrain) from the Falcon, an economy mid-sized sedan. Don't even get me started on the 4.6L 'mod' motor, it was pretty much THE only V8 offered between with various SOHC and DOHC combos. It was in everything from the Crown Vic to the Navigator to the Mustang Cobra.

To add, since the demise of the F Body platform, the only cars in the entire North American GM lineup to use an iteration of the LS2 are the Vette, GTO and the XLR. Since the death of the L98 in 1992 there have been 6 revisions of the 350 SBC (LT1, LT4, LS1, LS6, LS2, LS7.)

 

^--i think the SSr has the LS2, also, but the XLR still has the LS1 (350 hp)...

 

Sorry, as Razo pointed out to me on AIM, I get the LS and the Lt confused. Still dumb though. Body platform is one thing, same engine?


The Mustang Cobra only shares an engine with the Mach 1

 

the Mach 1 is a standard GT engine, but with a hood scoop and 5+ hp...

 

^--i think the SSr has the LS2, also, but the XLR still has the LS1 (350 hp)...

Blah, SSR doesn't count. And for the 2006 model year, the XLR will be packing the LS2.

 

my

Anyone notice the 4.0 V6 in the current and previous Mustang is the same V6 that was originally developed for the Explorer and Ranger? Shows how poor Ford is at full re-development, since that engine's been used for at least 6 years in cars, and 9 in Trucks.

 

the Mach 1 is a standard GT engine, but with a hood scoop and 5+ hp...

Do your research NOOB! It has the Cobra engine. That's why it's pushing 300hp. And not the 260 the GT makes. it's a Cobra engine without a S/C.

And don't pull that 2004 B.S. Were talking all past years.

 

isnt the Aston Martin DB9's V12 derived from basically 2 3.0 Durotec V6s out of the Taurus (and Sable, and Mazda 6)..?