That’s right I just got back from another demo, this time the dealer let my wife and I take the Frontier out solo or sans the salesman. Well I’ve been on the fence with annoying redundant posts, asking about 4-Cyl 4x4 AC Tacomas to, LB, DC PreRunners. I’ve also been lurking on the Frontier boards. Most of you have dogged this competitor as being less menacing, less sporty, not as tough, not high enough, small cabin, inferior etc.. So I set out to pick it apart from bumper to bumper. Heres my thoughts haven driven every combination of the ’08 Tacoma and coming from a “Die-Hard” Toyota truck guy. After looking at the ’08 Frontier in Avalanche white, in Crew Cab, Long bed config I find myself not saying this truck doesn’t look tough enough or mean but looks very contemporary, clean and slightly more upscale. It has a nice chrome front bumper that does actually look more substantial IMO than the car-like bumper cover on the Taco. I’m convinced I prefer the all-metal bed to the composite in my ’07 Taco. The rail and rack system along with tie-down cleats are and look more substantial than the flimsy and weak version in my ’07 Taco. The most obvious feature that lured me in was the ’08 SE V6 Crew Cab I drove today with a “sunroof” What! Why can’t I get an oem moonroof in a Taco? Also a lot of people on here dog the Frontiers interior, but I thought it was more comfortable, had more ergonomic storage places, a slick double “locking” glove box and the gauge cluster backlighting was 10X nicer than the red sea of lamps in my Taco.
To the ride, this Frontier I admit is the most composed, best handling pickup I’ve driven to date. The steering feel is more sports sedan like and not over assisted and light feeling like the last ’08 Prerunner I demo’d. Also the ride was less jittery and tracked better, the suspension felt more taut while not being equipped with an up rated shock set like on the TRD trucks. Not knocking the Pre-Runner because it’s badass, but when compared back-to-back to the ’08 PreRunner feels like the “QeenMary” and quite tepid at spirited speeds. This will be a work truck for me so I’m not looking to slalom, but want to make sure it will be a competent family truck on the weekends when the wife and I carve through the canyons back to our favorite camping spots. I don’t know why but for some reason the 230 something hp in the Tacoma feels like 260 hp while the 260 something in the Frontier feels like 220? It’s not slow by any means, but the Taco gets out from a dig with more momentum, the Frontier has a wild side once you get to 2nd gear and are above 3K rpm. Overall I’m caught up or either brainwashed because I’m on my 5th Toyota truck and I keep telling my self the re-sale value, impeccable reliability, average performance, and more than adequate utility are more than enough reason to get into another Taco. The only thing keeping out of a Frontier is questionable reliability, although I don’t know anyone that has had a bad Nissan, yet the 1998-2004 years were not good years for this product. It was plagued with an anemic, wheezy & thirsty 3.3L V6 the 2.4L like Toyotas was bulletproof but grossly lethargic. Also the interior materials border line “third-world” I can go on and on, it was overall a pathetic effort IMO when compared to the tank “Hardbody” trucks that put Nissan on the map. I’m also worried about the poor residual on the Frontier. The rear seat space doesn’t bother me, this will not be the primary family hauler and I aint ever sitting back there. What do you guys think?
-Ryan
To the ride, this Frontier I admit is the most composed, best handling pickup I’ve driven to date. The steering feel is more sports sedan like and not over assisted and light feeling like the last ’08 Prerunner I demo’d. Also the ride was less jittery and tracked better, the suspension felt more taut while not being equipped with an up rated shock set like on the TRD trucks. Not knocking the Pre-Runner because it’s badass, but when compared back-to-back to the ’08 PreRunner feels like the “QeenMary” and quite tepid at spirited speeds. This will be a work truck for me so I’m not looking to slalom, but want to make sure it will be a competent family truck on the weekends when the wife and I carve through the canyons back to our favorite camping spots. I don’t know why but for some reason the 230 something hp in the Tacoma feels like 260 hp while the 260 something in the Frontier feels like 220? It’s not slow by any means, but the Taco gets out from a dig with more momentum, the Frontier has a wild side once you get to 2nd gear and are above 3K rpm. Overall I’m caught up or either brainwashed because I’m on my 5th Toyota truck and I keep telling my self the re-sale value, impeccable reliability, average performance, and more than adequate utility are more than enough reason to get into another Taco. The only thing keeping out of a Frontier is questionable reliability, although I don’t know anyone that has had a bad Nissan, yet the 1998-2004 years were not good years for this product. It was plagued with an anemic, wheezy & thirsty 3.3L V6 the 2.4L like Toyotas was bulletproof but grossly lethargic. Also the interior materials border line “third-world” I can go on and on, it was overall a pathetic effort IMO when compared to the tank “Hardbody” trucks that put Nissan on the map. I’m also worried about the poor residual on the Frontier. The rear seat space doesn’t bother me, this will not be the primary family hauler and I aint ever sitting back there. What do you guys think?
-Ryan