Also... I did cross post this issue and my other thread got "closed". Sorry for the cross post but it made sense to me that this issue is a "cross-over" issue and would be relavent in both catagories. As it is, I received different responses from different people under each of the different identical posts, so, cross posting turned out to be helpful in my situation. Ok, NOT debating, just explaining. I won't do it again.
To answer the last post in my other thread... the poster asks if I think I can design a car better than Toyota. My response is, YES! Well, sort of... here's why: I've been bulding engines and restoring cars from scratch for 20 years. Ok, realistically, I CANNOT design a car better than Toyota, but I know enough about cars and engines to know what's good and what isn't for the car itself and the driver/ consumer. This is sometimes in conflict with what the gov't and EPA prefer.
Toyota (and all manufacturers for that matter) do what they need to do in order to get the cars to meet federal mpg and emissions requirements. However, the things they do to achieve this are not necessarily good for the car itself or for the driving experience. When I pay $30k for a car, I want a 100% perfect driving experience and a car that functions in such a way that it will last as long as it can and should.
Toyota makes the car rev high for two minutes upon cold start up primarily for emissions purposes... engines produce less emissions per rpm at higher rpm, plus the high rpm helps the engine warm up faster.... thus less emissions. Fine. Yeah, I care about the environment, but in the end, I do NOT want to do neutral-drops every morning in my $30k car, period. A few extra PPMs of CO2 for one minute is not going to hurt anything, but neutral-dropping a few times every single day is going to wreck my driveline after a while... so guess what I am more concerned about. Call me selfish, but if so, please write me a check for $30k and I won't be selfish anymore.
In my old cars back in the `70's, I'd simply reduce the fast idle speed on the carburetor, and the cars would run great, no neutral dropping, etc... and they'd still warm up just fine because I know how to warm up engines properly. Now with these new computer controlled cars, I can't adjust anything... and it's quite frustrating. If I was younger, I would surely look into a career in automatiove computer engineering so I could learn how to MODIFY auto computer parameters. I know guys do this now, but not for all cars. I would give ANYTHING to be able to hook my car up to an external computer and modify the control parameters, such as idle speed, ignition timing, etc, etc, etc. Oh well.... in another life. But... I'd be willing to pay a large amount to have someone go into my Highlander's computer and fix this fast idle problem... so, for you younger guys, might be a good business to get into.
As someone pointed out, the one good thing about the fast idle on a cold engine is that it helps pump oil to all areas of the engine (higher revs means higher oil pressure). But, I don't need the car to rev up for me because I warm all my cars up this way anyhow. What I do... start vehicle, shift into first gear, then immediately drive slowly through the side streets at say 20 mph, about 1,500 rpm, for maybe 5 or 10 minutes... this warms up the engine quick while distributing the oil well, plus puts enough load on the engine to keep the pistons from "rattling" around yet not enough load to hurt anything prior to full operating temperature. This is the best way to warm up an engine. Letting an engine idle only for a long period is not good. Over-revving or beating on a cold engine, also not good. I've built enough engines and done enough experiments with engines to feel quite confident that this is true. I will accept a debate on this, but ONLY if you're a professional engine builder.
So, I guess all I want to do is be able to have full CONTROL of the engine speed at all times. I'd like to start up a cold engine, then shift to drive at LESS than 1,000 rpm (thus no neutral-drop), and then drive off in first gear at 1,500 rpm so I can warm the engine myself. I guess this is too much to ask since Toyota must figure 99.9% of Toyota owners do not know or care about any of this stuff.... ok, I understand that and it makes sense. I still wish I could have full control over my new $30k+ car though. I guess I am just too used to rebuilding engines from scratch and having full control over ALL parameters, adjusting things to perfection (the way I like it, not the way the federal gov't and EPA want me to!). Big Brother!!! :lol:
I realize that shifting into drive at 1,500 rpm isn't the END of the world, the tranny is not going to split in half, but... it just bugs the heck out of me.
By the way, I tried turing the ignition on for two minutes prior to starting the engine.... this did not help.
I think what I will do is make some small custom ramps for my garage. When I pull in at night, I will drive up on these small ramps and park the car. THen in the morning, after I start the engine, I can put the car in neutral and allow the car to roll down the ramps picking up speed... then shift into gear while the car is already rolling at 5 mph or whatever... that will reduce shock on the driveline. If I can cut the shock in half, that's better than nothing. Realize that I plan on keeping this car for at least ten years... and at 2 "neutral drops" per day, this means over 6,000 neutral drops over the life of the car... so, anything to reduce shock to the driveline each morning will help in the long run.
Am I obsessing? Yes. But I enjoy cars and am sensitive to how they operate.... and if something isn't operating "correctly", it bothers me. I can't help it. :thankyou: