Apologize if this has been brought up before, but I'm curious.
:lol:Ricky Bobby said:We gotta keep ole Mhadden outta here!!! Every time I see his signature, makes me want to go test drive one of them things. I know if I ever do, that'll be the end of ole Blue!!
J/K!!
MUHAHAHAHA:wink2:Ricky Bobby said:We gotta keep ole Mhadden outta here!!! Every time I see his signature, makes me want to go test drive one of them things. I know if I ever do, that'll be the end of ole Blue!!
J/K!!
I agree, unless they could get the 4.7 V8 to have equal or better mpg then our V6, I'll stick with the good power and decent fuel economy of the V6. However, if they were able to accomplish that, then the current V6 would basically become an obsolete engine. Unless they could tweak it for better economy.skidmike said:If it came with a tranny and gearing that would allow for better mileage than the V6 while achieving better performance, I'd be all for it. Not that I'd trade mine until I needed to.
Frankly, I see nothing to complain about with the V6..
-- mike
No need, but yes want.viet2100 said:V8 = no need for a S/C :clap::clap::clap:
Hans Moleman said:I bet with the 5.7L V8 in the Tacoma, it would get better gas mileage than the 4.0L v6 because of all the low end torque. The Tundra is much heavier than the Tacoma and it is only rated at 1mpg less than the Tacoma