UTQG has a traction rating. And, its irrelevant to speed rating. "A" is plenty good for a Camry. Traction rated "A" can be found for economy cars and Corvettes. "AA" isn't needed.
Handling, ride comfort, braking,... have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPEED RATING. That depends on the construction of the tire. Dont' automatically assume that a higher speed rating is all that better. Never heard of tire recalls?????
Anyone want to wager what the top speed of a V6 equipped Camry is? THAT IS the only logical reason why we have a speed rating. You can find youtube videos of the 2gr-fe pushing Camry's over 140. I don't think I've ever seen one go over 150mph. And, with a mildly optimistic speedometer, the V rating seems to be PERFECT for that top speed of <149. Its called covering the manufacturer's butt! Ever hear of the word liability? Can you imagine a 270hp car with a speed governor set to 85mph? would it sell well? That same liability is why any reputable shop won't take the risk of using a lower speed rated tire. If you install 85mph limit tires and go 150mph, your family will sue the shop into bankruptcy after they cremate you. If it was my shop and you insisted, I'd make you sign a waiver explaining the limitations of the tire when compared to capability of the vehicle. Not sure what the top speed of the 4cyl Camry is and don't care. But, I'd wager that it is considerably less than the V6.
As far as I'm concerned, the suspension in the Camry sucks. It neither rides or handles well. Not sure what Toyota was thinking or trying to do, and why someone thinks that a speed rating is all critical if no one ever exceeds the speed limit. Mass produced generic suspension catered to making ALL somewhat happy and no one ecstatic.
Do you really think generic off-name or imported V-rated tires are better built than lesser rated name brand tires? If so, lay of the peace pipe, booze, and whatever you indulge in....zombie!
If you want to dump stiff tires for better ride quality, or if you want to dump low traction tires for ones with traction, or if you want to dump no-season tires for knobby snow tires for winter, or if you want to swap rims/tires for the bling factor, or if you want to dump inefficient OE tires for eco-enrivo-mpg-fuelsaver tractionless tires.... or whatever is YOUR CHOICE IF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR ARE DOING AND FEEL COMFORTABLE DOING IT.
I'll stick with my previous comments. If someone was offended, too bad. Its Maine. Its winter. And, I wouldn't put ANY no-season on my car in Maine during the winter. Get some generic alloys or steelies mounted with snow tires. Use the no-season tires, whatever you choose, during the weather less months, and don't exceed their limitations. If you don't have that option, new tires are better than bald tires!
In the world of $500 phones, touch screen crackpads, $300 sneakers, $100 t-shirts, $150 jeans, and $1000 laptops, that do absolutely NOTHING for you, don't cut corners on your brakes, tires, or other things that directly affect your safety. Obviously, if tires are bald, and budget does not exist, then you do what you have to do and you ADAPT TO IT.
Too much BS in this thread. Its about speed rating and NOTHING ELSE. Its not about comfort, braking, or handling.
I'd take that T-rated Michelin tire over any Chinesium V-rated tire. And, I'd avoid store-brand generics too from SamsClub, Sears, TownFair, DepartmentStores....
The real question that the OP should consider is: Am I willing to purposely limit my speed to whatever tire I choose? Will the T-rated tires provide better snow/rain traction during the winter when compared to the V-rated tires since I don't have the budget or storage space for 2-sets of wheels/tires? Will the T-rated construction be an adequate replacement for my current V-rated tires for my handling and my ride comfort expectations? And the last question, am I willing to sacrifice lobster and steak for MaruchanRamen to pay for V-rated over T-rated tires? Choose your lifestyle and driving habits!
I've been known to run NON-UTQG snow tires year round.... no speed rating what-so-ever, and I adapt my driving style and expectations around the equipped tires/brakes/fluids/whatever. Toyota's recommendations are just that, a recommendation! And, they can shove it because its not good enough for my expectations. This is the company that has numerous times put UTQG threadwear OE tires in the 160-220 range that last 15k-25k before going bald. For some reason, they think that a treadwear of <220 is acceptable. Even pathetic tires can be had with treadwear of 400-800. Sad if someone thinks that their recommendation is the greatest. Can't think for yourself anymore.