I have been doing quite a bit of research on the 2vz and FI. However, the one thing that is a consensus but without any proof or disassembly, etc is that the 2VZ is a weak engine, and as a result, needs extensive rebuilding to handle any boost.
Now before i begin I will say that if i were to boost my engine, i would use a GT28rs turbo, as that plants me right in the middle of the compressor map for 250 HP. I would also most likely open it up to replace the head gaskets with either MLS or new copper gaskets to replace the known offending graphite based 89-96* (toyota used same head gaskets for 3vz) HG's. In addition, while it was apart, i would probably get a new set of pistons as the ones from factory are cast economy. Lastly, the heads would be machined and ported to offset the negative affect of F designed heads.
However back to the question, multiple sources state that the 2VZ has a weak bottom end, and should be avoided for boosting purposes. What is it exact that makes the 2VZ so much worse than turboing a 3sfe or a 5sfe or even a 3vzfe. Besides the 3vzfe begin a truck design adapted for a car, its essentially a stroked 2vz. But what makes the 2vz such an awful engine? :dunno: the impression i get is that if i were to boost slightly at 5 psi, that the engine will explode in a fiery mess and i will die. What makes the cast crank worse than the cast 3vz 3s 5s crank, are the oil holes worse, are the bearings not designed correctly, etc.
unless someone tells me conclusively that the 2vz is indeed a poor candidate for forced induction, i seriously see it as a smaller 3vz with different injector firings and displacement.
Now before i begin I will say that if i were to boost my engine, i would use a GT28rs turbo, as that plants me right in the middle of the compressor map for 250 HP. I would also most likely open it up to replace the head gaskets with either MLS or new copper gaskets to replace the known offending graphite based 89-96* (toyota used same head gaskets for 3vz) HG's. In addition, while it was apart, i would probably get a new set of pistons as the ones from factory are cast economy. Lastly, the heads would be machined and ported to offset the negative affect of F designed heads.
However back to the question, multiple sources state that the 2VZ has a weak bottom end, and should be avoided for boosting purposes. What is it exact that makes the 2VZ so much worse than turboing a 3sfe or a 5sfe or even a 3vzfe. Besides the 3vzfe begin a truck design adapted for a car, its essentially a stroked 2vz. But what makes the 2vz such an awful engine? :dunno: the impression i get is that if i were to boost slightly at 5 psi, that the engine will explode in a fiery mess and i will die. What makes the cast crank worse than the cast 3vz 3s 5s crank, are the oil holes worse, are the bearings not designed correctly, etc.
unless someone tells me conclusively that the 2vz is indeed a poor candidate for forced induction, i seriously see it as a smaller 3vz with different injector firings and displacement.