I was doing some searching on the forums for information on CVTs and I found a member that has the name, NoCVT. Out of curiousity, what do people have against CVTs?
They are rather old. The first CVT design was made by Leonardo Da Vinci, hundreds of years before the first car was invented.VVT-i Owns said:Actually two identical cars, one with CVT, one with a regular automatic, the CVT car should accelerate faster as it keeps the engine in the peak power RPM, where as the automatic shifts in and out of the peak power band.
CVT is actually an old technology and as Octane said used in many ATVs and Snowmobiles, the reason they just recently showed up in more automobile applications is that because the Materials Technology today has taken leaps from 15 years ago, this allows them to manufacture CVTs for higher power applications with good reliablility.
I consider that to be a plus. It gives a smoother and less noisy ride. I hope that they continue to develop the non-connected CVTs for those among us who do not like noise, as I would like to drive a car with one of them some day.ECHOKnight2000 said:Going along with what the other posters said, the disconnection of no shifting points, I felt ackward when I test drove the Prius awhile ago, I accelerated and it seemed the engine just keept on going and I was expecting shift, really wierd feeling if you been driving a traditional tranny equiped car...but from what I hear manufacturers are designing the CVTs so they aren't like that as much or give the driver more of a "connected" feeling...I'm sure they got a lot of complaints. But like Octane said, its one of the most effecient trannies out there.